• LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Bro just one more post processing technology, trust me, just one more and all the clarity issues are going to be fixed, just one more. One more and that’s it, it’s going to look native, just one more. Just let me do one more, please.”

    Great, now I can play those blury, washed out, Vaseline smeared UE5 games at 40 FPS on high end hardware with a bit sharper upscaling artifacts. And only have to pay what, $700 more compared to a non GSync monitor?

    Nvidia can go and eat sand.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      with a bit sharper upscaling artifacts.

      Pulsar is not upscaling nor is it interpolation. There are no upscaling artifacts.

      • jeeva@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think they’re saying this tech adds perceived sharpness to the upscaling artifacts 😅

        • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Eh, nobody is forcing them to use upscaling tech with the monitor. Go play Super Mario World with pulsar enabled.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      “Bro just one more post processing technology, trust me, just one more and all the clarity issues are going to be fixed, just one more. One more and that’s it, it’s going to look native, just one more. Just let me do one more, please.”

      Literally Digital Foundry for the last like, 10 years.

      Every time a new scaling tech or TAA method or whatever comes out, they talk about how it is so good and has next to zero flaws. Then a new one comes along and suddenly they start talking about all the flaws the previous one had and how the new one is “nearly perfect.” And then you look at the footage they are showing and its literally best case scenario, minimal to no camera movement, and little to no large or close objects moving at a high speed. Footage designed to minimize the flaws and maximize selling you on the tech, regardless of how little that is actually going to happen during real world gameplay for literally anybody.

  • Tim_Bisley@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    So annoying this is hardware tied to the monitors. This is the new gsync premium tax. The vast number of features monitors can have these days make it a proposition of Goldilocks proportions.

  • BroBot9000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Yeah it’s all the Shit TAA covering up lazy developers cost cutting.

    https://youtu.be/lJu_DgCHfx4

    TAA is a plague and is artificially inflating the performance cost of games to sell new GPUs and pump the Ai bubble up some more.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    So black frame insertion with VRR? Is that what it is? Struggling to tell and struggling even harder to care.

    Can’t help but think the motion would look even clearer without DLSS bullshitting entire frames out of nowhere.