• mkwt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I think a child porn distributor tried to hide his face using that swirl tool. And he found out that Photoshop will unswirl it quite happily.

    • Zomg@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, it was just reversed.

      If anyone wants to seriously sensor an image, it has to be a destructive edit where pixels are removed, not transformed.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      If anyone is wondering how: it’s roughly akin to rotating a photo and rotating it back (on a non 90° shift) - the input pixels get moved around with some interpolation.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Mr. Swirl Face. I would link to his Wikipedia entry, but his Wikipedia entry DOESN’T SHOW WHAT EVERYONE WANTS TO SEE.

      So just search the name.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Using the spray tool isn’t much better. I’ve sent people PMs of their de-censored faces to show them how leaving 50% of pixels untouched is plenty of information.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I remember seeing this in some subreddit, and a bunch of brainrotted AIddicts were too busy spouting “here’s a way more realistic version from Gemini” to read the room and figure out that they were being made fun of