I want to know what will the rich people lose, when we tax more than 100M dollars.

      • glorkon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 days ago

        Well… Kingda Ka is said to have cost $25m. Using that as a ballpark figure.

        I want wooden coasters, steel coasters, hyper coasters. Other attractions, too. Gotta buy the land, build the infrastructure around the park, employ lots of people, build hotels, gastronomy… a billion might not even be enough for everything.

  • nile_istic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 days ago

    Own ten digits of wealth instead of nine. There’s nothing of actual value to billionaires. The point is to just watch the number get larger. Growth for growth’s sake; the ideology of a cancer cell.

    • sahin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      To earn more money, or to help society? If you are trying to earn more money, what are you gonna do with it?

  • notabot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    I don’t think the money is the point, it’s the power and influence that the money can afford you that is the really important thing. Sometimes that will involve straightforward bribery, but most of the time it is ‘soft power’, i.e. a way of persuading others to do what you want. Sometimes that’ll be wining and dining them, sometimes it’ll involve a million or two donated to their favourite charity, sometimes it’ll involve a private island and lots of discretion. Often, I would imagine, one would not even need to spend the money, just the fact you could do these things in a way that would cause your target difficulty would be enough to have them do what you want.

  • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 days ago

    Launch a spaceflight program (although that is something the government rather than individuals should be doing anyway)

    • sahin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Give bribe to the government to launch a space program and make them set you up for a role there. Way cheaper ;)

  • RBWells@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    21 days ago

    Give away 900 million dollars.

    I agree with your premise though - too rich is just hoarding. There is no real lifestyle benefit.

  • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 days ago

    While I can see many things with price tags well above 100 Million US$. Like planes, hospital, semi conductor lythography machine. A single person owning them is a problem per se.

    Moreover, almost every serious project of super rich net worth tax isn’t capping your wealth, but just making sure you pay 1-2% of your net worth as takes which is still way less than everyone else, and won’t prevent you to get richer investment capital growth.