💯

    • Ugandan Airways@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 days ago

      The cause is to separate you from your money and time. To reinforce and promote capital as the ultimate gatekeepers.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        yeah but it’s not made by the people the propaganda works for. they’re just cogs. normal propaganda is made by the people championing the cause in question.

        • Ugandan Airways@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          12 days ago

          If you work for an advertising agency, you know that your job is to separate people from their money. They celebrate this. They have awards for this. It’s the whole purpose of their job.

    • racoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      advertising is forcing you to pay with your time and attention. I started hating all kinds of ads when I first flew with Ryanair. There aren’t headphones big enough to withstand two and a half hours of uninterrupted bullshit

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    123
    ·
    12 days ago

    Ad-blocking is a property right. I have every right to control what my device does or does not display, by definition of ownership. Conversely, advertisers or other parties attempting to colonize my device by forcing it to display something against my (the owner’s) will is a hostile act that violates my rights.

    • hector@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Except we are beginning to not own what we own. The computer is yours, the software is just licensed, and they are trying to take everything away from us, from ovens to washing machines, they want to make it all subscription, spying on us, and serving us ads. We don’t have the right to repair the products when we break, and it’s a federal felony to “break” any sort of digital lock on a device, and I think to change it’s programming too.

      That said, it’s a moot point as of yet, because while websites forced me to whitelist their sites to use them when I had adblock, I was told about ublockorigin, and I see no ads, and the sites can’t tell I am using it.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        12 days ago

        the software is just licensed

        That is a GODDAMN LIE perpetrated by copyright cartel shysters to swindle all of us. The entire legal theory that assertion rests on is absolute nonsense: they want to pretend that you “need” to accept an “EULA” to use the software because otherwise copying it from the installation media onto your hard drive and/or into RAM would be a violation, but that is wrong because 17 U.S. Code § 117 (a) (1) carves out an explicit exception that allows it. EULAs are bunk and do not constitute a valid contact, as they not only lack ‘acceptance’ because they attempt to work on adhesion (trying to impose new terms after-the-fact when the transaction to obtain the copy has already occurred and concluded), but fail to provide any meaningful ‘consideration’ to begin with!

        They can pry my hardware and software that I own from my cold, dead hands.

      • Quantenteilchen@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        Sadly, and I am not a lawyer so this is not even close to legal advice(!!), “beginning” is potentially the wrong word when talking about licenses due to copyright. Because even a single flipped bit in RAM on your computer could be constructed as a copyright infringement if pushed in a legal battle and decided in a court. (This all sounds squishy because, again, I am not a lawyer and as far as I know nothing of this sort has had clear ground setting or breaking rulings yet…)

        Why am I of this opinion despite also usually loving to take the “my device my rules stance”? Because I got to proof read some final exams for legal professionals-to-be for their technical accuracy and let me tell you: the most likely legal outcome they saw was not good for most of us. (So now I really really hope that some high up court rules on a case like this and sides with “common sense” about what is and is not allowed with our owned hardware!)

    • luridness@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I always and will also try to give websites 1 try.

      If I like your content on your site you get 1 try to show ads and if they are not offensively placed and not playing audio… you get to live

    • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      12 days ago

      Thats fair if you also hold the stance that they can block you if you aren’t paying to use the service. But i doubt you do.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        12 days ago

        What fucking “service?” Software running locally on my own computer isn’t a goddamned “service” to begin with!

        Also, fuck off with your bullshit assumption of bad faith.

        • IndieGoblin@lemmy.4d2.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          The web browser and the website are two different piecee of software. Running a web browser doesnt entitle you to access a web server.

          You are asking the web server for the page and its giving it to you with ads. If you then decide you dont want the ads the webserver has every right to not serve you the page.

          It would be different if it was a local application. Web servers have a material cost for processing a request it costs money to serve you that page. Its completely fair for you to decide that your browser isnt going to display ads but its also just as fair for the website to turn around and reject your request or choose to serve you something else.

  • voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    If you want to actively shit on them, there is AdNauseam, which is a fork of uBlock Origin but in addition to blocking the ads, it clicks on absolutely everything, sending fake signals. Polluting their database is costing them money and they have to deal with all the noise.

    Not for everyone, but definitely an active hostility towards these fucks.

    • just2look@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      13 days ago

      That seems like it opens the door to a lot of security issues. Part of the reason to use uBlock is that ads are a known threat vector.

      • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        13 days ago

        All clicks are performed in an isolated sandbox separate from the user area (basically imagine the click register signal going out, but nothing more).

        • tyler@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          What if you have a multi layered ad blocking setup where you’re using ublock origin and pi.hole and a VPN with blocking?

          • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            13 days ago

            The multiple layers of redundancy would likely clash with Adnauseum, yeah. Although that probably is just wasted compute - you may only need one or two of those solutions to have effective adblocking (uBlock for supported browsers, pi.hole for devices unable to have uBlock installed) rather than all 3 at once.

            • tyler@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              13 days ago

              Well I’m not gonna bother turning off any of the layers when I’m out and about. Like, my laptop still needs ublock when I’m not at home. And the vpn is just for certain use cases.

                • tyler@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  I have tailscale set up. I’m not gonna have my wife be using tailscale. And I’m also not going to be using tailscale all the time. I even have an exit node on my server.

      • agingelderly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        13 days ago

        As someone who works in marketing - they will tote these clicks as a great success and continue to do what they are doing, maybe even more so, but will be distraught by the lack of follow through when it comes to sales. I guess if it happened long enough, And on a big enough scale, they might eventually give up but it would take years

        • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Didn’t Louis Rossmann say that the conversion rate when they briefly ran repair shop ads was less than 2% or something similar? I think he referred to it when talking about using adblock and donating/buying merch for your favorite creators instead.

        • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          Or, more likely, they would not include the fake clicks in their metrics at all, and marketing would never see the inflated metrics.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Site gets paid and I get the content I want. Only one losing is the advertiser, which is a good thing in my book

      • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yeah they can probably just ignore your entire profile because it’s gives no useful insight, and that’s the point.

      • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 days ago

        Exactly, its data poisioning.

        If someone is trying to build an ad profile on you (even if you personally dont see the ads) then it feeds them junk data instead of real date.

          • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Its purely out of spite, plus, im not clicking anything.

            I run the full ad blocking suite anyway and see more ads watching a sportsball game with the family than I do on my home network over the course of months.

            1. I dont see the ads
            2. The data they generate is wrong and random, if that is used to train AI it runs the risk of poisioning the model.
            3. The site Im on gets paid by the ad vendor, even though the interaction is fraudulent.

            I call it a win-win

    • RiQuY@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      I prefer using Pi-Hole (DNS based block) the ads don’t even waste my bandwith.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Do you know if AdNauseum actively merges in new uBlock Origin changes, or is it fully forked?

    • GaumBeist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      12 days ago

      The worse the product is, the more desperate they get to shove it in your face. Good products don’t need to pay others to pretend it’s good, you just find out via word-of-mouth or free trials

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        12 days ago

        I was thinking about this just the other day. There’s a popular market in my home state, one I’ve been going to since childhood. It’s a single store, not a chain, and it’s almost always packed. I’ve never seen nor heard a single ad for it in my life. Naturally, that makes me like the place even more.

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yep I actively avoid companies that inundate me. I’ve switched insurance companies because of it (local agent got me much better rates too).

  • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    12 days ago

    People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you. You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity. Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head. You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs.

    Banksy

  • corvus@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    13 days ago

    I moved to Linux, use Freetube, LineageOS on the phone, listen all day to internet radios from the command line, browser with uBlock add on and it’s been years since I saw or listened an ad.

  • amos@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    12 days ago

    Another word for “marketing” or “advertisement” is Manipulation. Shady, manipulative, tactics.

    Fuck them. I love Lemmy because it seems like the ratio of like-minded people is much larger here. Nothing better than seeing other principled people that would rather give up some comforts than deal with ads and bend the knee to the pieces of shit that try to push them.

    Even products in the supermarket (such as bread!!) come with ads in the fucking plastic wrapper. I have changed my bread brand due to this. I will absolutely give up any comfort to avoid your manipulation. I will fucking shower in cold water if it means I don’t bend the knee to pieces of shit.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      12 days ago

      Another word for “marketing” or “advertisement” is Manipulation.

      Don’t worry they’ve solved that, it’s called 🩷 𝐼𝓃𝒻𝓁𝓊𝑒𝓃𝒸𝒾𝓃𝑔 😎. That’s much less ominous! They just influence!

    • dkc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 days ago

      It’s been a minute so I could be misremembering, but you’re not far off. Another word for public relations (the shaping of public opinion) is propaganda.

      Edward Bearnays wrote a book titled Propaganda, where he talks about the need to rebrand the work of Propagandist after it became associated with negative influence during WW2. From what I recall he used the term public relations, but seemed to prefer the term propaganda.

      He’s also the person infamous for convincing Americans that we should eat bacon and eggs for breakfast. Another interesting story is about how he advertised to make music rooms in homes trendy, so he could help sell more pianos.

      He talks about some of the early manipulation tactics advertisers use. Such as trying to sell you an experience instead of a product. Think of how modern car commercials show a lifestyle more than they show you the car.

      It’s an enlightening book that shows that before the war, calling an advertiser a propagandist wouldn’t be out of place. Those propagandist manipulated us into calling the PR now.

      Oh, and if I recall correctly propaganda comes from Latin and means “to propagate.”

    • Reginald_T_Biter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      12 days ago

      Well said. It disgusts me a lot, and it also dismays me to see a lot of people don’t care at all about ads. I even rememeber people in my old job talking about ads on tv. Boggles my mind.

      If I am forced to see or interact with an ad I will do absolutely everything in my power to excise that ad source from my life.

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    If you have to react to advertising you’re already doing it wrong. If it’s able to reach you on your hardware in any form, you’ve already failed.

  • anguo@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    I don’t do any of those things, because my devices block them before they ever reach me.

    • MoffKalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yep. One must move beyond an “I hate you and I hope you die” relationship with ads, to a “I don’t think about you at all” relationship with ads. Regardless of how many fits Google throws about ublock, one can always do VPN/DNS type filtering. I’ve honestly almost forgotten ads exist.

      • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        12 days ago

        There’s some tech blog/news site (can’t recall the name right now) that tries to shame me into turning off my ad blocker and viewing their ads with an extra pop up

        “Hey! We noticed your browser isn’t displaying ads. Can you…”

        HAHA NO

      • hector@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        12 days ago

        What do you mean fits about ublock?

        I had to download it off the internet and not the play store on both my phone and computer, but it worked, still works great, I see about zero ads and it blocks a lot of pages entirely.

  • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 days ago

    I used to think anti-consumerism was a lot more popular. It’s a significant disconnect from how I thought people are. Apparently I took more media related courses in high school and university than most people do.

    One thing that continued to confuse me is how tech cultures are unrepentantly consumer capitalists. The earlier times of the world wide web was very counter-culture. So it’s been an unending source of befuddlement how tech nerds have been deep-throating the adtech boot.

  • SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    12 days ago

    You guys get ads? 😈

    Actually I’m always surprised at how pervasive they are. I keep thinking the way my home infra is set up is normal and people are exaggerating about ads for lulz.

    But every now and then when I jump on a unfiltered system I realise “No, no they are not”.

  • aeischeid@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    13 days ago

    Not just personal mind poison, but societal poison too. Most of our media companies are just ad businesses with whatever they portray as their main products as window dressing. Meta, Google, NYT, all TV networks, even NPR is increasingly funded by ads. I was hopeful in the shift to paid streaming services this might change, and it did sort of, for a while, but increasingly they too are turning to ads.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      13 days ago

      Not just personal mind poison, but societal poison too.

      i came to realize this when when my home built router died a few months ago.

      it was based on pfsense and i had setup publicly shared advertisement blocking; so i hadn’t see any ad at all for years.

      i became annoyed when i started seeing them after the router died and then i actively became angry when i was bombarded by them while watching tv as i was visiting family, yet they didn’t think anything was wrong with watching the same mcdonalds advertisement 500x in a single hour.

      that shit has an impact on your psyche whether you know right away or not.

      • Bosht@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 days ago

        Yup. For me it was when I went on vacation with my family. Tried to enjoy a movie in the evening after a day out and my god. Ads every literal 7 minutes of movie. How the fuck anyone can deal with that is beyond me.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 days ago

          same here, i couldn’t finish watch the movie because i was so angry about it. lol

  • brap@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 days ago

    I grew up with every internet ad being likely hostile, you didn’t click any of them. It kinda stuck with me.

    But also they went way overboard. If it’s a site funded by advertising and there was just a simple banner at the top or something then fine, I’d just ignore it still but whatever. But everything is so obnoxious now, so fuck ‘em.

  • Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 days ago

    It blows my mind that some people on my team were excited to watch the commercials during the Super Bowl.

    I live my life in a way that minimizes the advertising I’m exposed to, and some people are just mainlining that garbage.

    • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think there is an American ritual aspect to it. I hate football and never watch it other than the super bowl. I’ve always just watched it for the funny ads, halftime show, and social gathering aspect. There is nostalgia for the 90s-00s where funny Superbowl ads became cultural touchstones, and early “memes” that people would quote and talk about the rest of the year if not more. Though honestly, it feels like the mojo is gone. The ads rarely seem as funny as they used to be. Or maybe we are just so inundated with internet ads and the lightspeed meme cycle that they simply can’t draw the same level of cultural relevance they once did.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yah but the ads during the Super Bowl are usually interesting and fun and I don’t mind them.

      Which begs the question, why aren’t all ads fun and interesting? I’ve seen some YT channels make them this way and it makes them far more palletable.

      • Murdoc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        Fun and Interesting ads are actually the worst ones, because they get you to associate pleasant feelings with their product/service/brand, which dilutes your ability to make rational, objective choices about them. That’s one of the ways that they are manipulating you.

      • eldavi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        you felt that the big brother ad for the ring cameras was interesting and fun?