• saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    When I lived in Australia, we had floods. The news kept using the term “inundated” so much we turned it into a drinking game.

    “This place is inundated”, “That place has inundation”, “Were expecting here to be inundated”. And you’re thinking, “With what? Zombies? Donations? Locusts? Oooooh, rain water. Yeah, that’s called flooding, not inundating.”

    It was so weird, but all the news outlets did it.

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      News media often have editorial requirements that ban themselves from using certain words. Sometimes it’s because the words are politically incorrect but other times it’s much more mysterious as to why they don’t use them.

      • MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        When I worked for a newspaper we were asked by a campaigner not to use the phrase “committed suicide”, because it dated back to the days when suicide was a crime. We were asked to refer instead to someone having taken their own life. It made sense, so that’s what we did. You can call it “politically correct” I guess. I see it as just being sensitive to the feelings of people grieving for a loved one.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        the words are politically incorrect

        Ah yes, Republican projection strikes again.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      You were flooded with articles about inundation? I bet using that term resulted in a flood of comments on those news pages.