cm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 11 days agoAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square35linkfedilinkarrow-up1213arrow-down15file-textcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1208arrow-down1external-linkAn upcoming California law requires operating system providers to enforce basic mandatory age verificationwww.pcgamer.comcm0002@infosec.pub to Linux@programming.dev · 11 days agomessage-square35linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devpcgaming@lemmy.caprivacy@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldlinux@lemmy.ml
minus-squareBrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up47·11 days agoStill fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
minus-squarepivot_root@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8·11 days agoIt’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.
Still fucking stupid and just a slow creep towards some bullshit like “kernel level age verification” where most Linux distros can’t possibly comply because the chip manufacturers won’t work with developers to certify unless they pay a $10,000 fee.
It’s like Secure Boot but actually, 100% useless.