• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    27 days ago

    That’s good news. I hope it’s a budget device with a plastic case, SD card, IR emitter, notification LED, and headphone jack.

  • pasdechance@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    27 days ago

    This site is a (possibly AI) content mill. The sources are all circular.

    It probably isn’t Motorola.

    Edited, see comment for clarifications…

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47053243

    GrapheneOS was contacted by one of the largest Android OEMs in June 2025 and we’re actively working with them. They’re going to be announcing our partnership in March 2026 and the phones meeting our requirements with official GrapheneOS support are scheduled for 2027.

    Xiaomi, Huawei, Honor, and Vivo are all larger OEMs than Motorola.

  • outbloodyrageous@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    27 days ago

    Damn, that’s surprising. Motorola has never been known for a strong update policy, and having a good update schedule is one of the key requirements for GOS. I hope they are addressing this issue.

    • lemmysmash@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      I think this is exactly the win-win situation from this possible partnership: Motorola makes secure hardware and firmware patches, GrapheneOS takes care of the whole software security and timely updates (they already do).

    • Ilandar@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 days ago

      I thought the same initially, but Lenovo also owns the ‘Think’ line of products which have historically been targeted at business customers and known for security. Whilst neither of the ThinkPhones currently meet GrapheneOS requirements, Motorola has been improving in that regard (according to GrapheneOS). Motorola also recently released a phone with 7 years of security updates, which is unusual for them.

      Motorola, although it is now owned by Lenovo, is still headquartered in the US. North America continues to be one of its primary markets, and it’s the next biggest company there by market share after Apple, Samsung and Google. Micay is based in Canada AFAIK. Altogether it makes a lot of sense to me that Motorola would be the company to reach out, as opposed to another Chinese brand headquartered on the other side of the world with zero market share or presence in North America, or one with any prior reputation for security.

      • outbloodyrageous@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        26 days ago

        Yes, I agree with you. Motorola does seem to be the most likely collaborator. If they can fix the update schedule, make it affordable and release a phone that’s easily available world wide, it would be better than what the Pixels offer.

  • darthsundhaft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    26 days ago

    Fucking finally. The only reason I couldn’t get my hands on GrapheneOS is due to having to buy a Pixel which, wherever I look, would be around $400-$500 for something that they themselves admit would likely only get around 7 years of support.

    I can’t spend that kind of money right now. I need something below $300 and if possible, below $200.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Honestly, $400-$500 for 7 years of support is a killer deal. 5 years ago the only manufacturer to give a meaningful amount of support was Apple, everyone else was up to 2, even for flagships.

      But I completely understand your situation, especially if you’re trying to be fiscally responsible and NOT get your phone on a payment plan of some sort. The 7 years of support means you might be able to find a 2 year old Pixel for below 300 though? Unless they don’t depreciate fast enough for that.

    • snowdriftissue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      Unfortunately the first device from this partnership is unlikely to be cheaper than the a series Pixel lineup. The GrapheneOS team already confirmed it will have a flagship snapdragon SOC. Have you looked into used a series Pixel devices? The 8a can be had refurbished in the low $200 range, and it will have software support for 5 more years. The 9a can be had for about $250 and will receive 6 more years of updates.

    • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      Bruh Android devices used to only get 2 to 3 years of support at most not that many years ago. 7 years is a MAJOR improvement.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      26 days ago

      I didn’t like the look of the batteries in the pixel watches. I actually have a Huawei watch (yeah, I know) and it’s great. Turns out, when you’re subsidised by the Chinese state you can make a good product that costs less.

    • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      for something that they themselves admit would likely only get around 7 years of support.

      Do you know of an android device with longer support than 7 years? The norm is 3 years.

  • clawfennik123@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    26 days ago

    Honestly thought they’d partner up with fairphone since both companies share a similar view in longevity for the end user. Hope Motorola does the same

    • Octagon9561@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      GrapheneOS devs have been very clear about Fairphone not caring the slightest about security. They are the last OEM in the world they’d choose.

      • jnod4@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        25 days ago

        Can we get a grapheneOS lite for fairphone? I care about sideloading apps and removing gapps, not about state actors

    • orioler25@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      Fairphone has a partnership with Murena to ship a variant of the Gen 6 with e/OS/, don’t they?

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Honestly this is the most interesting thing in the world of mobile for me since I initially heard about GrapheneOS looking to branch out to another OEM as an option.

    Assuming it is in fact a Motorola phone, it would have to be a big piece of shit or unbelievably expensive for what it is before I wouldn’t be very tempted by it.

    If it was literally a Moto G Power 2025/2026 with GrapheneOS out of the box for $300-$800 I would probably be on board. Supporting something not Google Play or Apple bound is important enough to me that I will pay some level of a premium price for it to support the mission behind it, like I do with System76.

    • 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      25 days ago

      Motorola is a major supplier of communication equipment for the IDF and produces bomb fuses used in IDF’s bombs. It also donated money to Project 2025.

      I don’t know, I expect them to call it the (We’re clear on) OPSEC 1

  • guillem@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    27 days ago

    I hope this will also be good for affordability and we’ll get GrapheneOS on more downmarket devices.

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Me too, I’ve grown kind of suspicious of Graphenes security so getting official support by Motorola is nice.

    • smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      26 days ago

      GrapheneOS has strict requirements about hardware being secure enough, so if existing Motorola phones were secure enough then they’d already be supported. This is presumably about future devices that Motorola are going to build.

  • thatKamGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    26 days ago

    As an iPhone user from the 3G days, this is legitimately interesting to me. I love the form factor of the modern Razr flip-phones, and having access to a privacy-focused OS like Graphene might just tip me over the edge.

    Anyone with first-hand experience, how’s Graphene OS with banking apps?

    • berrodeguarana@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      26 days ago

      It runs fine on my Pixel 7a, I have an account with 2 Brazilian banks and they all work well.

      Some apps just don’t work though, but they are far and between, an example is Brazil’s gov.br, which is a website that is used for ID confirmation on everything that pertains to the government (tax revenue, your own business details,etc.). But then an old phone does that job for me at home.

      Speaking of Brazil, it is worth mentioning that Google Pixels are not officially sold here. The ones I did obtain I bought on a “Brazilian eBay” and there is no e-SIM support for it nor any warranty services. I had to do the battery replacement myself despite knowing that Google was offering to fix faulty Pixel 7a’s on NA/India/Europe/etc. I am only bringing this up because, coincidentally, 50% of Motorola’s smartphone sales are on LATAM. It’s a pretty smart move they are making if you ask me, they are aware they could explore this huge market it seems.

    • kalpol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      26 days ago

      I haven’t had any trouble with banking apps. One gives me a warning but allows me to continue. Google Wallet doesn’t work for payments but that is just fine with me.

    • floofloof@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 days ago

      My bank’s app won’t run on my Pixel 8 Pro with GrapheneOS. Most apps run fine. It’s pretty much just the bank app and eBay that refuse to run.

        • djdarren@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          25 days ago

          The only trouble with the website (my bank’s website at least) is that you have to input a passcode, then a secret password, THEN it’ll send a 2FA SMS for me to put in a third code. Yay for security, but I’d love to be able to login with my thumbprint.

        • floofloof@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          25 days ago

          It annoyed me at first but it really doesn’t matter because the eBay website works fine. It’s just some companies choosing to use Google’s API to check OS integrity. It’s supposed to be a security check to make sure core components haven’t been hacked, but of course Google makes their API returns a “no” if your version of Android doesn’t let them run all their spyware.

    • InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      Anyone with first-hand experience, how’s Graphene OS with banking apps?

      Depends on the bank. Chase didn’t work, but bank of america did.

    • djdarren@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Banking and finance is the one area where Graphene falls over for me in the UK, on a Pixel 9.

      In short, my bank’s app - Lloyds - doesn’t work on Graphene. At all. I have Play Services sandboxed, and I’ve tried all the tricks, but nope. No dice. The website works in the browser just fine, but is kind of a pain in the arse to have to manually log in to whenever I want to use it.

      And, as with all Graphene phones regardless of bank, Wallet does not allow registration of any payment cards. Neither my credit nor debit cards work. Store reward cards do though, so that’s something.

      Workarounds for me are currently:

      • a Monzo card registered with my Garmin watch,
      • my bank card saved in the Lidl app, which can be used for payments
      • a magsafe wallet that holds my debit card

      I’m led to believe that the Curve app can be used for contactless payments, however, I somehow failed the ID check when I tried to register with them, and their customer service is APPALLING. It’s been five months, and I’m still no closer to actually getting hold of anyone who might be able to help. Also, Curve was recently bought by Lloyds, so it seems likely that that option will be closed in the foreseeable future.

      Ultimately though, it’s fine, and the benefits outweigh those few drawbacks.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Use your bank’s web portal. If your bank doesn’t let you use a web portal, switch fucking banks, because that means they don’t care about you.

      Bank apps are filled with all kinds of tracking spyware.