• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    210
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    They went from standing with Anthropic to throwing them under the bus real fast

  • perishthethought@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    mainstream

    I’ll believe that when my sisters start saying this. Till then, it’s just us privacy fans screaming in a dark cave, enjoying the echo.

    • Xorg_Broke_Again@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      93
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      28 days ago

      It’s always like this. We get a ton of articles on how everyone is suddenly boycotting/deleting [insert thing] but when you ask someone in real life, they usually have no idea what you’re talking about.

      • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        28 days ago

        so explain it to them gently. you won’t reach everyone, but you’ll reach more people than accepting this status quo

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        The one thing I will say is that there does seem to be a generalized dislike for AI that has all the investors and upper management types nervous. Even by their own studies do people generally either not care about AI in their products or actively dislike it/find it intrusive. There was a study by a phone company from this past summer or fall that concluded that 80% of their users had no interest in AI or found that it actively made their experience worse, and there have been plenty of pretty damning reports about how useful it’s been in various industries (just look at Microslop). That is not conducive to convincing investors to fund your product and does not show a viable path to making a profit in the future.

        We’ve seen similar things happening recently with car manufacturers walking back on their big touchscreens (with some help from regulation in civilized places that care about things like “pedestrian fatalities” - like Europe) due to consumer sentiment. They tried for nearly a decade to push bigger and bigger screens into cars and remove physical buttons, and now they’re moving in the other direction. Completely anecdotal evidence, but the last time I went to buy a car I told the salesman at the dealership that I wasn’t interested in cars newer than a certain year because that was when they increased the size of the screen and put them in a more obnoxious spot on the dashboard, and he said that he heard similar sentiments from practically everybody who came in looking to buy a car - everybody hated the bigger screens.

    • criscodisco@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I had a coworker tell me how cool Copilot was because he asked it a question and it found the answer in an email in his outlook mailbox. I thought, “you needed AI to search your email?”

      We are probably cooked.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      I know what you mean. It’s a pretty vague term though. You could argue that as soon as it enters the midsection of the bell curve at all, it’s “in the mainstream.” It doesn’t have to have captured a full 90% of the bell curve.

  • raskal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    28 days ago

    Canada recently has had its 2nd worst school shooting ever. The killer had many interactions with ChatGPT that warranted banning her account. A whistleblower has claimed that they wanted to inform Canada’s police force of these comments but were denied by ChatGPT’s management.

    They had a chance to stop the death of 8 people, most of which were young children, but failed to do anything.

    FUCK CHATGPT AND THOSE BASTARDS THAT RUN IT

    • jagungal@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      28 days ago

      Why would you not contact police? I understand that this is a systemic failure and blame does not lie with that employee but if others me I’d rather be out of a job than have those deaths on my conscience for the rest of my life.

      • Takios@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        27 days ago

        It’s probabilities. If you report it you’re 100% out of a job but only maybe prevented something bad from happening. If you don’t report, you keep your job but maybesomething bad happens. Reliance on a job for survival shifts the decision even further to taking the course of action that’ll keep you your job.

  • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    28 days ago

    Windows Central shouldn’t be parroting the U.S. government in mislabeling the Department of Defense.

    • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      28 days ago

      Sam Altman is just some fail upward money guy, he’s been eventually removed from basically every prior position he has held.

      • scarabic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        The more I learn about this guy, the more amazed I am that his staffers stood up for him when he got fired. I guess they just hated the board more.

  • cloudskater@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    I cannot believe this is what it took for a boycott to go more mainstream. Tell me more about how so many people have no respect for the environment or the artists who’s work they gleefully consume.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    28 days ago

    Use for “all lawful means” is quite the grey area considering no one was arrested or fired, or any law updated, for what Snowden leaked. If the NSA does it, no one will arrest the NSA.

    • frog_brawler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      28 days ago

      I laughed when I read “all lawful means.”

      Those are almost the exact words that you’re supposed to use for a NFA form 1 / 4 when registering certain types of firearms / firearms parts that require a tax stamp, and additional scrutiny.

      When I did my SBR registration, it was “all lawful purposes…” but fuck, close enough…

  • David_Eight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    28 days ago

    The Department of War isn’t a real thing. Its called The Department of Defense. That’s not my opinion either, its officially/legally called The Department of Defense.

        • pkjqpg1h@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          28 days ago

          You’re right. I researched it, and it was just changed 6 months ago by Trump, who claimed the new name “sends a message of victory”

          but is still technically named the Department of Defense, as only an act of Congress can formally change the name of a federal department.

          Edit: Added info

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            28 days ago

            No. Trump declared it changed, much like Michael Scott declaring bankruptcy. Until there is an act of Congress changing the name, it is still the DoD, and the Kennedy Center is the Kennedy Center, and so on.

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      26 days ago

      Actually it’s so they have plausible deniability if they “accidentally” kill a bunch of people that just so happens to be a group they openly despise.

      I think that’s way way worse but

    • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      27 days ago

      I just got grapheneOS on my new phone (it is a google pixel 10, but it is the one that can handle that…) I needed a client to use my gmail which will probably be the last thing I get rid of.

        • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          I tried to do it in the more advanced way, but I had never done anything like that before and I consider myself moderately technical. I used a simpler bootloader to get Frankel (the latest grapheneOS for Pixel 10. I have a basic Pixel 10, not the pro or fold) installed. I was apprehensive, but it seemed to go on fine. I am able to sandbox any google shit I do need (and it isn’t much) and I was able to get whatsapp with my old shit on it because my family is still using it for reasons. I am using K-9 as an email client for my gmail, which does help (or so I was told) limit the amount of information google gets on my usage when I check my email.

      • wabasso@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        If it’s the sending and receiving part of email, I’ve switched to purelymail (you could pick another) and put it behind my custom domain name. Because behind a custom domain, that’s the last time you’ll have to update your contacts as it won’t be dependent on which email provider you choose.

        Searching through decades of old emails I do still use the Gmail account, but I just have to get off my butt to self host a local IMAP server for that.

      • yabbadabaddon@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        27 days ago

        No, I don’t think this is correct. There was a time during which Google did great things. Their search engine allowed millions if not billions to gain access to knowledge. They had a positive impact on a lot of FOSS projects. What they were is not what they are.

        • gnutrino@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          27 days ago

          The tell was getting rid of “don’t be evil” as their motto. Even for a corporation that was a little on the nose.

        • digital_digger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          27 days ago

          Agreed. They even refused to extend their services to China because of censure. But that was before, after change of CEO, enshittification started.

    • qualia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Mass surveillance for advertising seems marginally more benign than mass surveillance by one’s own government, personally. Though admittedly both are bad.

      Edit: I can find alternatives for most of Google’s ecosystem but mapping out accurate bus routes is terrible via OSM/OsmAnd or Organic Maps. Anyone have any tips there?

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        The mission statement is irrelevant when the outcome is the same. Google has data a hostile power wants and gives it to them whenever they want.

      • ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        Mass surveillance for advertising is just gross. I remember a comedian making a joke saying that ‘anyone here in advertising? Please kill yourself!’ Also just because someone got all the info on your for advertising, it doesn’t mean the government won’t get access to it, because right now 4th amendment and other traditional restrictions on government overreach are moot if all they need to do is buy the data from some broker on you. This has actually happened and it was upheld in court.

        The precedent for stuff like that is older than you think, but also not what you think. For example some serial killers and serial bank robbers were caught because some homeless person searched through their trash looking for something they can use, eat, or sell (all of these things are legal to do BTW) and they discover things like body parts, firearms, or brand new clothes that also fit the clothes that said criminal was wearing when they did their crimes, and said homeless people reported this to the police.

        But I am quite confident that someone who just so happens to stumble upon something vs. a company watching your every move are two very different things.

  • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    28 days ago

    After Anthropic refused flat out to agree to apply Claude AI to autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of American citizens, OpenAI jumps right into bed with the United States Department of War.

    I think people are a little bit missing the important bit. This government wants to send out autonomous weapons along with mass surveillance. They’ll just murder anyone they want, if the AI gets it right in the first place.

    Here we are in Running Man and no one sees it coming. This is why Stephen King is so against this administration. He predicted it.

    • pemptago@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      28 days ago

      I can’t believe now we (Americans) have to pay for it with our tax dollars.

      • XLE@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        28 days ago

        Even if there weren’t defense contracts, these companies are enjoying massively reduced water and electricity access, while it becomes more inaccessible and more expensive for everybody else.

    • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      28 days ago

      Many times it’s mandatory. Like when your employer forces it upon you and makes it automatically invoke ChatGPT whenever you open a pull request.

        • GnuLinuxDude@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          28 days ago

          I “use” ChatGPT because my employer has forced it into the workflow, and they’re the ones paying OpenAI. So I now have a linear relationship with ChatGPT through my employer. The more work I do, the more I use ChatGPT, even though I do not have a choice in the matter and if it were up to me I’d not be using any AI tools at all.

          Using it is now part of my performance evaluation beginning this year.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    28 days ago

    Yea, I can just imagine OpenAI is really struggling with their business decision.

    On the one hand, they have multi-billion dollar contracts with the US Military that will make them all fabulously wealthy beyond their wildest dreams.

    On the other, they have a handful of individuals leaving that might amount to a few thousand dollars of lost revenue.

    Gosh, it must sure have been a tough choice.