As mentioned elsewhere, this is appropriate for anyone doing database administration, because DB writes should always be a trans action.
I get that this is a joke, but…
… ackshually it should almost never be a transaction only when there’s absolutely no other option, because transactions kill your performance.
Actually transactions can be a secomd-layer safety-net for single-responsibility writers to ensure rollback on eg restarts and consistency on loadbalancer redecisions without having much of an impact on performance, and data integrity is usually quite important.
As long as the database is acid restarts should not be a factor. Data integrity is not helped by transactions, you would need error correcting codes for that. Plus the effect on performance is quite notable on all dbs I’ve worked with.
Restarts in a server between dB updates that in a sane world would be txns I meant (e.g update A, crash so don’t update B). Anyway, in postgres they’re pretty cheap in the absence of actual conflict – more expensive if you have actual cinflicts, obvs.
“Pretty cheap” is very subjective…
Well it depends how much data integrity is worth to you, and how your system works. Every write in postgres is already a transaction - when you can get away with simple crud stuff, often there’s nothing to do, you have transactionality already. Transaction isolation levels are where db operation costs might change under concurrent conflicting writes but you can tune that by ensuring single-writer-per-partition or whatever in your server logic and it might add a ms or two. OTOH if you have heavy contestation it can be much more expensive. The performance implications are complicated but can certainly kept to a fraction of overall cost depending on your workload!
Again, not data integrity (Error correction) but consistency (aCid). Adding two milliseconds to a half a millisecond operation is by no means cheap…
Unless you’re using Firebird (3) in which not using transactions kills your performance
Greybeards are an increasingly rare commodity, it seems.
I’ve been in the industry for 13 years, a technologist using Linux for 19 years - I think I’d count as a greybeard if I hadn’t lasered it off as part of my transition lmao
If you don’t mind me asking, how well does that work? I’m very interested in never having to shave again lmao
It hurts and it takes a while (at least on my face), and it costs a fair bit depending on where you’re at… but when it finally starts kicking in, I would STILL say it’s worth it.
I had Lazer done on face, chest, arms, legs, and genitals. You need to do like 8-12 sessions but I haven’t had to shave in years. Though there are like 5 clear hairs now that I pluck.
Are the many sessions because you only do small areas per session, or because you need to do the whole area repeatedly?
Repeated, hair growth happens on different cycles and not all will be active at the same time. Need a short root for the Lazer energy to kill the root and sometimes one hit does not kill the base and needs to be hit again. https://milanlaser.com/inclusive-clientele/trans
https://www.reddit.com/r/MtF/comments/15zbz45/does_anyone_have_experience_with_milans_unlimited/
You need to get the whole area done repeatedly, the follicles only die if they get zapped during a certain phase in their growth cycle. Typically laser sessions are spaced about a month apart to allow time for previously killed hairs to fall out and the remaining ones to make some progress in their cycle, you can expect to lose like 10-20% of the remaining hairs with each session.
You can get rid of the clear hairs with electrolysis, they have to target each hair individually but if you’ve only got 5 it won’t take very long
Yeah, I just keep forgetting to make an appointment.
Effectiveness depends on your skin and hair color, paler skin and darker hair get better results. Results are permanent, a dead follicle stays dead for good, but you won’t get 100% removal with a single pass because of how hair follicles cycle in and out of active duty. You’ll need to do multiple treatments over the course of several weeks or months depending on how your hair grows.
I can’t speak for lasers, but if you want to try something less permanent but -much- cheaper, to see how well it works for you or how you like it before you commit to laser, pick up an IPL device (intermittent pulses of light). It works similarly, but if you stop using it for a long time, the hair eventually grows back. Mostly.
Once you get it to the point that it’s not growing anymore, which is like 2-4 months of use as directed by the device itself, depending on your hair/skin combo and the strength of light you use (which in full fairness, it does start as a several-times-weekly commitment) you only need to do spot treatments every few months, which I understand is something you have to do with laser anyway every 6-12 mths, this is just a bit more frequent. If you stop using it entirely, you’ll start to get noticeable regrowth after about 6 mths, but it could stay thin for years. I have some places I stopped doing and they are still noticeably thinner and finer than places that never got treated at all, 5+ years on.
The one I bought was like $125 usd a decade back, so they can be pretty affordable, and might be all you ever want to use since you can do it on your own time.
As someone with dark hair and quite pale skin, I was basically a perfect case for it. At 7 sessions so far, the number of hairs that still grow on my face are countable - 43 of them by my count - I still do have to shave but it takes like 30 seconds because they’re all focused on my upper lip and one particularly stubborn spot on my chin. The important part is that when I shave, I have no beard shadow at all now. I may not 100% pass yet without makeup but it makes makeup way easier to not have to also collor-correct for beard shadow.
Others have answered with more detail but yeah, it also does take testosterone suppression or you’ll have to go back every so often to address any new/rejuvenated hairs. A cis guy friend of mine has to go just about every year.
Just for your information, it only works in combination with suppressing Testosterone. as long as testosterone is present in high levels it will come back
This is not true
I feel like greybeards were always people who care little for the standards/expectations of society.
They probably have a lot in common with trans people, who unfortunately are forced to overcome very aggressive and hostile societal standards.
But Greybeards have a lot of luxury relative to trans people. They’ve always gotten to do what they want because of competency as a bargaining chip. Trans people as a group generally don’t have that.
Anyway, I’m rabbit holing. We treat trans people awful and they do nothing to deserve that.
Edit: I don’t mean to say trans people aren’t competent, just that greybeards privilege exists because they’ve passed through a specific niche filter that the general population has not
Indeed.
A Transition Plan suggestion (?):
- Become a Greybeard
- Transition as you prefer
- Use your competency to give trans rights to yourself and peers
- Be happy and Profit!
Lifecycle of a rust enthusiast.
Used to be the lifecycle of a ham radio nerd now those guys are all weirdo magats
So, instead of the length of their beard it’s the length of their socks we should be considering?
Either, and I suppose in a few special cases both!
Both imply a higher chance of tech competency.
Hi I'm trans Peter and came here to explain the joke
It’s a pun, cis sounds like sys.
Cis(gender) is the antonym of transgender, Sysadmin abreviates System Administrator.
Thanks, Dad.
The others are sis admins
That took way too long to click.
As a former sys admin, this clicked immediately for me.
Congrats on the transition
At my department we’re all straight guys with a max 3 year differences. We’re an oddly homogeneous group.
No, that was by design.
More like last remaining egg
honestly, unsure if this is more a cisco or linksys joke at this time.
It’s a pun on ‘sys admin’
