☹️

  • qualia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    28 days ago

    Anyone interested in this area check out Ted Chiang’s short story It’s 2059, and the Rich Kids are Still Winning.

    Premise: In the future, scientists conduct an experiment to genetically modify poor children to improve their intelligence, so they have a better chance to succeed in life. While the experiment proves to be successful, and the children’s IQ increases, they still fail to achieve social progress, because the entire state system favors the rich only.

  • medem@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    28 days ago

    Where I come from, there’s a saying that goes something like this: ‘There are only two kinds of people in jail: the very stupid and the very poor.’

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      28 days ago

      😢
      Oh, this post is turning out to be a sad one.

      Anyway, I’ve heard that mental illnesses and other psychological issues often lead to jail and only get worse in there. Modern societies are not at all prepared to handle these kinds of problems.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        28 days ago

        Insofar as “modern societies” refer to the people who hold power in them, I’m not so sure modern societies are interested in handling these kinds of problems.

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          27 days ago

          Totally agree. It’s all about not being interested in handling these problems. That’s a bit strange though, because the current style is really expensive.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I wonder if he was allowed to kill himself, as an alternative to something much worse (e.g. being killed in a much more painful or gruesome way). It’s clear that the truly powerful people couldn’t let him testify against them.

  • snek_boi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    28 days ago

    Totally.

    Also, it’s kinda funny to strictly follow this logic, because it means that the rich still struggle to get justice if the criminals are the rich.

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      28 days ago

      When a rich person screws over another rich person, the one with more money will be able to inflict greater injustice on the other. Either way, this equation involves no justice, and people pay to keep it that way.

      • PityPityBangBang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        28 days ago

        I disagree. The rich house the police in the USA. The police in the USA don’t own homes frequently in the USA because that information is frequently publicly available. Property records would tie police officers names to an address publicly. So rich people house them for cheap rent in their extra homes to act as protection. No muss, no public records, no fuss, and rich guy has a knight errant available all the time.

        Too bad the poor can’t afford to do that.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    27 days ago

    What autocracy and plutocracy are: functions of government are only the province of the privileged capable of cruel manipulation.

  • The D Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    if injustice exists for anyone, no one has justice, just temporary repreve from injustice. further, justice requires peace. “justice” without peace is how the people are subjagated. “peace” without justice is how the people who have been subjagated are exploited

    • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Some fines aren’t a fixed amount. Could also be a percentage of your annual income. There are ways around that as well, but at least it’s a step in the right direction.

      • Ravell@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        27 days ago

        Could also be a percentage of your annual income

        But the truly rich have no “annual income” so wouldn’t their fine be even less than yours?

        • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zipOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          27 days ago

          The guy who sits at the back of a Phantom has no money or income so he pays no taxes, and he would pay very little fines. The guy who drives a BMW would end up paying enormous fines.

          Yes, this system has exploits.

          During vacation time, you can see other differences too. Strangely though, the first travels to a private island by a private jet. The latter would fly in first class and stay at an expensive hotel.