• TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s a class war, not a generational war.

    Maybe this can be reconfigured to make fun of the filthy rich, instead?

  • EffortlessGrace@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    As an elder millennial (1983), I too ignore Gen X. Especially after being shown the way they vote in U.S. elections.

    • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Also elder millennial. I thought I was gen x when I was a kid because that’s what TV would call the youth.

  • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean, I’d argue the “most ignored” is always the youngest. They’re not always the quietest, they are definitely heard, but you can be heard and still ignored. It’s unfortunately part of natural progression of life that as generations age they (generally) have more power to actually influence changes.

    The main problem is that the boomers have been around and in control for so long they are refusing to start to cede power (and wealth) to the younger generations, and continue to serve their own interests. If the younger generations had property wealth and they had stock market wealth, you would see them (generally) supporting more of the activity associated with it. But because the older generations hoard and hold so tightly to that power and wealth, the influence of the “up-and-coming” generations is hamstrung by not being able to actually push for the changes they want from a position of strength.

    So the younger generations lean towards the ideas that seek to eliminate that power source entirely, because clearly the “transfer of resources” is simply not happening. If you can’t get in the door, then why even have the building, so to speak.

    I think the better question is not “who is being ignored?” but rather “who is doing the ignoring?”. Gen X, Millennials, Gen Z, are all generally aware of each other’s struggles and have empathy (for the most part) for one another. But the boomers hear the struggles of all 3 of the others and go “pull your bootstraps, stop buying avocado toast, nobody wants to work” and continue to serve the interests that benefit them, not the other groups that need the benefits.

    And yes there are exceptions, there are young people in power who stomp on other young(er) people but the political climate across each of the younger generations is generally pissed off “upward” because the path to get there is being actively hacked away at.

  • waigl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    None of these were ignored when they were very young, so listing Gen Z as an option is kinda off to begin with. Most of these were not ignored when they were in the peak of their adult years.

    The real answer is, of course, Gen X.

  • sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    “Wahhh my childhood was full of no-cost 3rd spaces and safe communities for kids to be left to their own devices! We were so ignored!”

    *Leaves their child in the supervision of an ipad*

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 month ago

      iPad? Maybe VCRs. At least the material was still somewhat educational.

      And that is the definition of ignored. Don’t come back inside until it’s dark. Left to figure out the rest.

      • foodandart@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Don’t come back inside until it’s dark. Left to figure out the rest.

        And it is glorious to witness in action today. Builds grit into the kids.

      • Glytch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        The iPad comment was about the parenting skills of gen X, not about how they themselves were raised. It’s not entirely a fair criticism because Xers don’t just shove an iPad into their kids’ hands and forget about them. They also want teachers to parent their kids so they don’t have to put in the effort.

        • Rhaedas@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I didn’t read it that way. I guess iPad was a new tool for the youngest Gen-X that could afford it based on the year it came out. My comment was strictly from my earlier parenting before such times.

          I certainly didn’t have a VCR growing up. We just got thrown outside to play.

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    Gen x were such slackers they just slouched their way into the more impactful generations surrounding them. Now they’ve given up their generational identity and either identify with Millennials or Boomers (whether they actually acknowledge it or not).