• wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 days ago

    I know this design was for safety, with a shit ton of parachutes on the passenger cabin, but modularity generally fucks the economics of a plane design. You have to have a self-contained module, a plane that is flyable (and landable) without it, and you need a way to securely connect one to the other. Things get chunky real quick, and chunky is expensive, and modern passengers are basically "walking mozzarella sticks who think that $300 and a photo I.D. gives them the right to fly through the air like one of the guardian owls of legend. (!30rock@dubvee.org) For cargo planes, a lot of older designs would drop capacity by 20-30%.

    • Brummbaer@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      11 days ago

      modern passengers are basically "walking mozzarella sticks who think that $300 and a photo I.D. gives them the right to fly through the air like one of the guardian owls of legend.

      What does that mean? Do you want only Pilots with 5k flying hours minimum on a plane that have a military survival training?

      Public transportation needs to be boring, and for some reason airplanes are not there yet it seems.

      • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 days ago

        I don’t think airplanes ever will be there. It’s just too expensive to fly a plane, there’s too much risk, it’s never going to be boring to the level of a bus or train.

        It could definitely be way closer than it is, though.