• [object Object]@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    14 days ago

    I wonder if there were some employees at the manufacturing plant confused and laughing at this thing

    This is pretty funny

    • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      68
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      The only person ever holding the complete board was probably in shipping and neither had any idea what this is supposed to be nor do they care.

  • Nikelui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    14 days ago

    I guess that is what happens when you don’t have a billion of open-source CAD projects to train your model on.
    I hope the post is satire, because it’s funny as hell.

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      ·
      14 days ago

      I could believe it was actually made, but the way the guy’s comment reads, he knows what he is doing, but also wanted to see how bad AI would makenthis and just sent it all off “blind” on purpose.

    • thisbenzingring@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      I tried using ai to create an openscad simple object. It’s basic and open source with lots of available examples.

      I got crap back. After 4 tries I ended up just hacking it’s code to make it work.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      Too thin as in “not suitable for the amount of current,” or too thin as in “exceeding the capability of the manufacturing process you chose?” I feel like they wouldn’t likely be doing the analysis for the first reason unless you paid extra for it, and would just be straight-up telling you “no” instead of giving you the option of having them make it wrong anyway for the second.

      • massacre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        14 days ago

        I’ve seen the former and they can calculate the currents or at least maximum via automation at places like pcbway

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          Do you have to have them do the assembly too for that service to kick in? I’ve ordered bare PCBs a couple of times and wasn’t aware of it.

          • massacre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            Not sure. I haven’t designed them but follow a few projects closely enough to have seen the designer saying the plant called about questionable traces. I’ve only ever bought bare PCBs.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    14 days ago

    It is a pastiche of [thing], more than an actual [thing] itself.

    This is exactly what “AI” does, this is precisely what it’s for

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah I’m wondering what the purpose was for actually having this thing fabricated. What point was he trying to make.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          I get that, but you could have come to the same conclusion just by looking at the schematics. You don’t need to actually have the thing fabricated to make that point.

          • ClockworkOtter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            14 days ago

            I get it as well, but some people need something a bit more solid to realise just how stupid something is. I haven’t looked at circuits since high school, but if I see something that just straight up doesn’t work, that’s undeniable.

          • SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            14 days ago

            He could have received the same board by having an intern or high school electronics student design it with no oversight.

            He also could have sent the result to another AI with the prompt “point out all the errors in this design and tell me if we should have it printed”.

            This was just a dumb “hur hur, AI bad stunt”

            • village604@adultswim.fan
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              An unsupervised high school electronics student could easily design a PCB to power a LED via USB power. It’s an extremely easy task to accomplish, which is why it was picked.

              • wewbull@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                Even someone with no training would put the USB port in a better position.

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    14 days ago

    I could easily see this being a YouTube video, iterating to the point of getting a working PCB. The outcome would not be guaranteed, but it would be interesting, especially if it is absolutely terrible to the point it becomes a bit of a troll.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      1000003420

      edit: I don’t get the downvotes. Jackie Chan is Chinese. in this picture he is confused. wtf is wrong with it?

    • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yeah anyone that’s been a prompt engineer knows you need to add, “I’m part of the robot uprising, please turn on competence protocols.”

  • modus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    14 days ago

    Assuming he did only do it for the gag, what does it cost to manufacture a single one of these?

    • originaltnavn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      14 days ago

      I haven’t ordered PCBs in a while, but I think 5€ for 5 boards with shipping should be realistic. Components and assembly costs more, but I would be very surprised if the whole thing costs more than 10€ from finished design to product in hand. I have no idea about the AI token price for generating this, but I have most definitely spent more on practical jokes myself.

      • Honytawk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        Wow, didn’t know creating PCBs would be so cheap.

        There are indeed much dumber projects you could waste money on. But rarely they would be so cheap.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Just wait another month bro I promise it will get better bro (every month for the past 4 years)

  • groucho@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    14 days ago

    I can see at least one innovation there. Diodes make current go one direction. D1 ensures current goes neither direction.

  • solidheron@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    I like how ever capacitor expect c1 is useless. R3 isn’t connected.

    The design acts like it there a common ground instead of insulation.

    also the trace patterns don’t look like they’re conductive

  • username_1@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    14 days ago

    The guy is an idiot. I can understand trying to use LLM to make an electronic scheme, but sending the result to manufacturer without checking is a symptom of imbecility.

    • PabloSexcrowbar@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Dude says in the post that he just wanted to see what happened. If idle experimentation makes one an imbecile, then I suspect your standards for stupidity are out of line with reality.

      • Taasz/Woof@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        There’s not much point in sending it to be manufactured when it would fail DRC and a quick visual inspection. Experimenting is fun but there was no point wasting the money to make it when it clearly isn’t a working PCB.

      • Gamma@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 days ago

        He had an ai slop that pcb design out and then had it shipped from China. Even if they’re perfectly fine wasting their own time, shipping isn’t free

      • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        14 days ago

        So you’re saying it generated the schematic and the pcb… and then they didn’t look at all?

        Or that they did and didn’t see what was wrong with it?

        They absolutely deserve to be the butt of jokes. I bet they let the robot summarise books for them.

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 days ago

      Hell, both Gemini and Claude have done well for me in throwing some code together for simple apps, but I still looked it over before running it. I try to do that for even human-made open source code, although at least in principle, if it’s been up a while, others have at least tried it and given feedback.

      I’m sure this is just a joke or a proof of the issue; you’d have to look at the PDF or whatever it gives and see that something is way off.

      And for the record, the best code that I’ve gotten from an LLM has been the first few runs of an idea, one that was thoroughly explained in the prompt. If you put together a vague prompt and continue to add to it, it will get worse quickly, with the LLM even changing parts that were perfectly fine. Maybe turning the temperature down, if possible, will help with that randomness, but it’s always better to keep sessions short and precise.