The most important part of FLOSS is “F”, apparently.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I’m arguing right now with a user who things that the developer of rsync should either change how they write code or hand over their project to someone that meets their personal standards for how software should be written.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Have you mentioned yet that anyone can do that second one by making their own fork? And that no one is required to give a fuck about how they think it should be done?

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          What an entitled and dumb twat. I guess he didn’t think it through that the guy maintaining it now doesn’t have some magical ability to tell who would be a good new owner and “handing over the mainline” to any one person could screw people more than any AI changes because that new person might be malicious or neglectful.

          Forks need to earn trust and it’s best that that step isn’t skipped by some inheritance. Not that there even is any obligation to hand it off no matter how many people rely on it or complain.

          And the comparison with ms or Google was dumb because I didn’t expect them to do it the way I wanted and stopped using what I could to get away from where they were going and any expectation that they hand over their projects to someone else would be ridiculous (and Google open source projects have been forked).

  • tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Not to take away from the point but the F in FOSS stands for “Free as in freedom” and not free as in price.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Though if it’s truly freedom, then it should also be free as in price. One is a superset of the other.

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        You can charge for free software, for the binary and/or source code - bandwidth/storage ain’t free.

        • jaybone@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yes. But the source code should also be available at no cost, and you should be able to build it yourself right? So freedom should be a superset of free.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Being able to build it yourself is a must: otherwise you can’t make/share changes (and use changes from others).

            I lean towards a “pay want you want” models (including 0) as DRM is pointless. But no, I do not believe binaries or code must cost nothing for it to still be free software.

            4 Essential Freedoms of Software, made by Jeison Yehuda Amihud

      • tabular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think people say FOSS and FLOSS interchangeably and come to say FLOSS due to floss being as established word (dental floss). If you know of “libre” then that you probably know the free software vs open source distintion too and would just choose to say one.

  • Jaycifer@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s so nice of her to open her mouth that much so the cat and get to work with the floss he’s been maintaining!