I’m addicted to laughing at how much money they’ve wasted on it. Does that count?
except Microsoft will probably suck at AI too so if it becomes addictive they will likely not be the leading company. They started coding agents almost before anyone else with arguably more data than anyone and still somehow have the worst propriety coding agent.
How’s that working out for them?
They’ll just make it free to education establishments. Eventually the next generation will only know it.
As they did with Windows and Office tools.
That was an effective long-term ploy but I don’t think it would work here - AI is a steam train running on pure cash to heat the boiler
When are microslop gonna learn that all they have to do is make a good product?
When people and businesses stop buying their products
I dunno. That keeps happening and they seem to keep doubling down.
Microsoft doesn’t have it in their DNA to get people addicted to AI. That part of their DNA mutated into a cancer a long time ago.
Microsoft meant be “addictive” in the sense of using Microsoft’s AI to make a spreadsheet, type an email, make a PowerPoint etc… Microsoft wants AI to access all your information to so its results are custom to the user and provide huge value.
This is where value and profit are a contradiction. How much profit is Microsoft willing to potentially throw away in an effort to provide an incredible AI user experience? Spoiler alert: not enough.
When was the last time you were blown away by a corporation because you had such a great experience and couldn’t stop telling people about it? This is what Microsoft wants to happen with their AI but they haven’t been capable of doing that with any of their products for decades ei Windows 10, 11, Bing…
The last I thought “what a great product” from them was when I used winxp for the first time, and that was only because I came from 98se (which was just shy of the bane of humanity, whose title then belonged to win98). After a while using XP, I realized it was actually garbage, and that “good compared to” was not the measure I wanted for my os, and so began my search for a daily Linux. This was 20 years ago. They have decidedly not gotten better in those 20 years.
It’s been a long time since they have done anything well. Look at how much of a flop OneDrive was. They don’t have the framework as a company to develop and train AI to be the way the leaked email wants it to be
Man, surveillance loves snooping what AI is snooping.
The best addictiveness is being helpful. But I bet it is too difficult for MS, so they will proceed with some psychological shit to keep users.
Not necessarily. If it answers you question and go go about your day, that’s not as good for Microsoft user numbers/engagement.
They probably want it to just barely get you exactly what you need to keep you on the edge. Once they start training models for user engagement the enshitification will begin
ugh let me finish!
They probably want it to just barely get you exactly what you need to keep you on the edge.
Phrasing!
The only addictive thing Microsoft has ever had a hand in is Age Of Empires II.
Solitaire is what led to Windows dominating the market
Pinball and that one Weezer vid would like a word.
Lol my SO and i still. Play LAN AOE2 to this day. such a great game
Hell yeah. Briton longbows FTW.
Well it worked, in a way. It got many many more people addicted to hating Microsoft.
Addicted to Linux
Wait, what? Does this mean when AI told me I was insightful and right over and over about everything I typed in… it was just to make me want to continue to use it?.. How could this be?
And if a pharmaceutical or drug has addictive properties with no medical uses, the government outlaws it by scheduling it as having abuse potential. Seems like a big double standard.
I’ve got some bad news… all of society is based on double standards. Humans are far less logical and much more emotional, gullible, biased and egotistical than we would like to think.
While it’s just a guess, pharmaceutical lobbying is likely why. None of that happened before the FDA was created sometime in the early 1900s.
Right now we’re in the political stages of considering the regulating of internet access to minors, the addictiveness of social media is not regulated.
It’s an interesting thought, and maybe I’m misunderstanding you, but why would the pharmaceutical industry lobby to have certain drugs outlawed? For example, Purdue pharma went to great lengths to hide the truth about the addictiveness of their drug.
My limited understanding of the history was that during the patent medicine era, medicines had proprietary formulas and varying compositions. For example, many formulas had cannabis extract, others contained opium. The initial regulations therefore were done for medical purposes of drug purity. Edited to add, it wouldn’t surprise me if the overuse of opium in the patent medicine era led directly to judging the medical usefulness of these drugs, although it’s just a guess.
I know the media frames this poorly and someone at Microsoft wasn’t smart enough to dance around the subject but everyone wants their products to be addictive. The sugar industry, petrochemicals, beauty etc etc. They all want this.
It probably needs to be if they have any hope of recouping what they’ve spent
They just want it to he addictive so that people use it a bunch. Then they try to sell enterprise level versions to companies they can say look how much people use it, it must be because it is so useful
You don’t always get what you want…
