• python@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve been using a magsafe card holder ever since I switched to GrapheneOS. Been working surprisingly well - I thought I’d forget my cards way more often, but it’s actually fine.

    The only two negatives I’ve had so far is that my snake got her head stuck in my card holder’s finger loop once. And the powerful magsafe magnet fried the magnetic strip on a loyalty card I have in there, so the cashier has to type my customer number in by hand every time.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    We can go even further and create some sort of physical tokens that we can give to each other. These token would be secure, completely private, waterproof and even work offline. Maybe we could even put some pictures on them and make them vision-impaired accessible - the possibilities are endless!

    People forget that cash is a technology - a pretty good one too.

      • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 minutes ago

        I haven’t noticed, but my grocery store recently limitted their cash back to $40, so you have to split your purchases into separate transactions until you have the cash you want.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      It would have been nice if crypto didn’t turn into a network of pyramid schemes.

      Like, I am sympathetic to the idea. I mined a Bitcoin a long time ago (and lost it in intervening years). But holy moly, did it erupt into a tire fire.

      • __dev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Even without the greater fool scam, it’s basic physics that a some dedicated servers will be more efficient than having every computer in a distributed network process every transaction.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            It’s not democracy though.

            Whatever the ideals of cypto are, however user friendly could be made, in reality, it’s just fundamentally too easy to be abused.

            As-is, it’s one of those “it would work fine if everyone learned it in detail, and grifters would go away” ideas, and that’s not going to happen.

            Democracy is fragile and exploitable too, but it has a track record of working across general populations for reasonable lengths of time.

            • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              What kind of abuse are you talking about? I doubt you’re talking about a 51% attack, which is incredibly hard. I’m guessing you are talking about social engineering, like where some scammer gets a poor soul to leak their bitcoin wallet or something like that.

              In these cases, yes a centralized payment system can be useful, because the authority in charge can just reverse transactions that are deemed fraudulent or the result of a scam. But that same authority can do things like ban all payments to Steam for porn games (like the recent Visa Mastercard drama). That same authority can say “GrapheneOS and Pinephone users aren’t allowed to make NFC payments”.

              In cases like these it would be nice for there to be an alternative to centralized systems, at least for those technologically literate enough to use these alternative systems.

      • jonion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        GNU+Linux is currently being used to kill civilians in several wars, but we don’t feel the need to point that out every time somebody says they use Arch btw.

        Good tech can be used by bad people without everybody having to distance themselves from the tech itself.

        That’s not to say that BTC is good tech, but it’s a decent proof of concept to free digital transactions from monopolists and tyrants.

  • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    380
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ll do one better:

    Reshaped payment card's NFC antenna

    My payment card was just a bit too wide to fit in my cellphone’s cover. The phone’s own NFC antenna is at the top - and I use it all the time - so the card had to be at the bottom of the cover to avoid triggering the phone all the time, in portrait orientation so-to-speak.

    So I dissolved the card in acetone to extract the NFC chip and its antenna, then carefully reshaped one end of the antenna so it’s a bit less wide (and since I couldn’t modify the length of the wire or the number of turns in any way to avoid de-tuning the antenna too much, I sort of accordioned one side of the rectangle to accommodate the extra length of wire).

    Then I set the new shape of the antenna permanently by carefully applying a piece of packing tape over it, flipped it over, taped over the other side to seal everything, then carefully cut around the new, ultra-thin, stubbier contactless payment “card”.

    Now it fits really smartly in my cellphone cover!

    • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Have you ever run into difficulty with needing to authenticate with chip+PIN? Like while traveling?

      That would be my big concern with this; it would make it very difficult to pass a PIN check, to say the least!

      Super cool idea. I might just try it myself and see if I run into issues.

      • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        21 hours ago

        What I modified was in fact a contactless payment token. It had the form factor of a payment card, but it only does NFC.

        I have another card for chip+pin.But I almost never use it where I live, because all limits were lifted on contactless payments a few years ago. If I try to pay something really expensive contactless, it will ask me for the pin - which is specific to the payment token.

        • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Do you mind if I ask what bank issued those? Why? Does the chip+pin also tap or are they features on totally separate cards?

          I’ve never heard of a separate tap to pay token (outside of perhaps transit passes or like, arcade cards), and never a card based tap transaction that asks for a pin.

          • ExtremeDullard@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Payment tokens are very common. Usually they’re sold as keychains, wristbands or rings, and they’re provisioned to work with the myriad of payment processors out there - which aren’t banks.

            in my case, it’s a token from iCard. The way it works is, it’s connected to a regular bank account number with an IBAN number (supplied by iCard when you activate the token), and you transfer money to it that you can then spend with the contactless token. The nice thing is, if you lose it, you can’t lose anymore money than you put on it.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Kudos for the effort. With that said, this would definitely raise some eyebrows if you have to return the card when getting a new one.

        • kamen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Knowing the reliability of our postal services, I would very much prefer to receive it in person. Of course there are security measures (activating it only when you get it and so on), but still.

      • InFerNo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I looked high and low for one where I could place my creditcard size tracker that isn’t also a flip cover, just a simple cover with a creditcard slot seems almost trivial.

    • OwOarchist@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      I dissolved the card in acetone to extract the NFC chip and its antenna,

      Wouldn’t the acetone also dissolve the insulation around the antenna wire? So when it touches itself, it shorts itself out, and – electrically speaking – you only have one turn of thicker wire?

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 day ago

        Wire that thin is usually insulated with an enamel coating. I’d guess it’s either unaffected by acetone, or just tougher to breakdown. Allow the card to dissolve, but remove and dry asap, don’t let it linger longer than necessary.

        Veritasium demoed this a few weeks ago while discussing tap-to-pay security and a vulnerability with apple pay+visa.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        Only one way to find out, good thing that these don’t cost any money and you can just ask for a new one.

        Maybe take some cash out first to cover any payments you may need to make it it breaks in some way.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          If OP is using it and is happy with it, maybe one turn of wire is enough for it to still work, maybe with reduced range?

          • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            My guess is it wouldn’t work. On a magnetic antenna, the number of turns don’t affect range, but they do affect the frequency to which the antenna is tuned. It needs to be tuned roughly to the frequency the protocol operates on, otherwise it won’t work. In addition to that, these antennas also need to pick up power, which is also relative to the number of turns.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 day ago

            Seems like something to experiment with at some point. I do have access to test contactless card readers but not sure how they would feel about me destroying the test cards.

    • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, what if you need an actual card for identification in the bank or something similar? Do you just show them the dissolved one?

      • Ricky Rigatoni@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Don’t know about OP but gov ID works for that purpose. I’m more worried about when they go to a store that doesn’t accept tap.

        • definitemaybe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I was thinking about this, and there are two easy workarounds, I think:

          1. If possible, get a second active card in the same name. Ideally, a full-identical cloned card. Not sure if this would be allowed, but if not…
          2. Add another authorized user to your account and never give them the card, then just dissolve that card for tap payments.

          But, in either case, I do think you might run into a different issue: automated fraud detection sometimes requires me to chip+PIN, even for transcribed below the tap limit. This has happened to me when traveling. I don’t think there would be any way around that, and if you then fail to authenticate with chip+PIN, it’s reasonable to think that the bank would lock your card for contactless payments until you successfully authenticate the card again with chip+PIN. (To be clear: this is only speculation; not sure if that would be an issue in practice.)

          So, I suspect that whether this would work or not might depend on your institution (or maybe jurisdiction?)

      • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only time I’ve gone to my bank in the last 20 years was to get a new card, or to open a new account at a new bank.

    • GutterRat42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Contactless payment works without connection. Now, the technical marvel is that it works even if the phone is dead.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Or you can just keep your card in your wallet, like you have done for decades

  • mEEGal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nice meme, but for us out there with at least a fully virtual card (some companies provide such benefits), we need a real MyAss-Pay alternative

    I recently found Walt, but it’s a work in progress for now. The app is avalaible though

  • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ironic it’s a monobank card, it’s mobile only and you have to use a locked unrooted googled phone (or an iPhone) because big brother said so.

    • FishFace@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I opened an account with starling partly because they have a real webapp, but you have to fucking log in with your phone, which is half the reason I want a webapp: because fetching your phone when you’re already at your computer is just a ballache

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hope that doesn’t get too popular, I don’t want to have to carry a second phone just to make payments when I can use a much smaller card instead.

      • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Nope. The website says “get app” like 4 times. There’s a webapp but it’s for business stats only (like if you own a cafe). They are just trying to “appeal to the younger generation”, and one part of that is the app that spams emojis everywhere. Another part of that is furry stickers (“qr cat”) believe it or not; in physical, Telegram and Viber because everything in this damn country is held together by Telegram and Viber.

  • bryndos@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve got this papery stuff, and circley metal discs that works in most places. Unfortunately it does have pictures glorifying some family of depraved paedos on it , but not easy to avoid that.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Carrying an actual wallet all the time is pretty inconvenient, but honestly, I’ve been considering getting back into cash for 2 reasons: 1) If more people use cash, it’s harder to legislate it away altogether and 2) so small-time vendors don’t have to pay taxes. I don’t mean the local grocery store (the big chains get audited anyway), I mean the person with a stall selling homemade smoked sausages in front of a store, or the guy by the road who sells smoked fish from the nearby lake.

      Also euro banknotes don’t have people on it to avoid the whole paedo glorification thing, so that’s cool

      • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Yup.

        And while the monarchist EU countries do stamp their monarchs on their coins, there’s more than enough decent and interestin people on other country’s variants.

        Like Austria stamping Mozart and Bertha von Suttner (first female recipient of the Nobel Peace Price).

        Or Croatia putting up Nikola Tesla, a Serb from Croatia, on some of their coins, likely to provoke Serbia. Or perhaps to symbolize unity between Croatians and Serbians but I frankly doubt that.

        Or France recently creating coins with three important French women on the 10, 20 and 50 cent coins: Simone Veil, Josephine Baker, and Marie Curie.

        Greece put up a couple people who were instrumental in Greek’s fight for independence and, more notably to Europe as a whole, the mythical Princess Europa riding on Zeus - the literal symbol of pan-Europeanism is on Greek’s 2€ coin.

        And that’s just a sample, there’s even more. Largely (ignoring the monarchies) people who genuinely deserve to be looked up to - or at least respected - are on the coins that have a person on them.

    • iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      If you live in a country with 19th century banking where people still pay each other by IOU on little pieces of paper, then sure. In modern countries a lot of places only take electronic payments.

  • boredsquirrel (he)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nobody here mention security?

    Like with passkeys (getting better though) and encrypted RCS messages, this is a proprietary standard that still sadly offers way more security.

    It is token based afaik and the secret is never shared or even readable by an attacker. This card can be stolen with a single swipe, all that is protecting you is the banking system being overly cautious and expecting their systems to fail, so you need to enter a pin code on higher transactions or your card is simply locked.

    Paying with VISA card online is insane from a security perspective, made slightly less bad by requiring authentication with a proprietary TAN app.