• guillem@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    It follows the pattern of Kafkian, Goethean, Brechtian, Ibsenian, Camusian, Foucauldian…

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Like USian over American…I get it but it sounds stupid

      Frank Lloyd Wright tried to popularize “Usonian,” but it never made it past the context of architecture.

    • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      USians sounds stupid because most of the world think USians are pretty stupid so it’s got a secondary aspect to it too. Plus, it’s not fair on the other countries in the Americas to be tarred with the USian brush. They have it hard enough and nobody needs that association.

  • Annoyed_🦀 @lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    Despite popular believes, H.P. Lovecraft isn’t a Cthulhu himself, but someone who popularise the idea of Cthulhu.

    • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Lovecraftian is an adjective for a narrative style, so it’s tied to the author itself.

      Orwellian describes the actions of political regimes in just two of his books. When applied to cautionary narratives allegorising or extrapolating existing authoritanism it fulfils the same role as Lovecraftian. When it applies to real world governments using 1984 as an instruction manual, it’s much broader.

  • lauha@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why capitalise the word? In my book it is written Ingsoc so it would be ingsocian, not INGSOCian

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Isn’t that short for English socialism? It’s been a while since I read the book but I’m pretty sure.

    These fuckers aren’t socialists.