• paholg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Are you capable of reading and processing information? Nevermind that the Great Depression was a worldwide catastrophe. Nevermind that it’s thousands vs millions of people. Did you notice where I talked about the larger pattern in the USSR? There wasn’t just one famine, but a shitload of things causing the deaths of millions of people, many of which were fucking executions.

    • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Are you capable of reading and processing information?

      Are you?

      Nevermind that the Great Depression was a worldwide catastrophe.

      Point to where I mentioned the Great Depression.

      Nevermind that it’s thousands vs millions of people.

      What methodology did you use to determine your numbers? And why would it matter anyway? Is it not a genocide if it’s bellow a certain amount?

      There wasn’t just one famine

      Yes there was, unless you’re counting the one caused by the Nazis flattening half of it, in which case I’m just going to write you off as a Nazi apologist.

      but a shitload of things causing the deaths of millions of people, many of which were fucking executions.

      Yes, that is indeed true of the USA, so why is the Dust Bowl “Just a thing that happened”, but the famine that happened in the same time period in the USSR not?

      • paholg@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m all ears, buddy. Paint me the picture of this dust bowl genocide. My mind is open. Convince me.

          • paholg@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 years ago

            Let’s see. 34 countries and the EU consider the Holodomor (check your spelling btw) a genocide.

            I can find… well, you, and nothing else claiming the dust bowl is a genocide.

            • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 years ago

              34 countries and the EU consider the Holodomor (check your spelling btw) a genocide.

              Interesting; and when did they make this entirely non-political determination?

              Also, that leaves 161 countries that don’t consider it a genocide. Oh, but let me guess: us-foreign-policy

              I can find… well, you, and nothing else claiming the dust bowl is a genocide.

              I didn’t realize that whether something was a genocide or not was decided by vote.

              • paholg@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 years ago

                It’s not not a vote. It’s a classification; they tend to not have perfect clear boundaries, and so one goes with the prevailing opinion of experts.

                But let’s forget the term “genocide”. In the USSR, millions of people were intentionally killed for no good reason. That’s fucked.

                • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  It’s not not a vote. It’s a classification; they tend to not have perfect clear boundaries, and so one goes with the prevailing opinion of experts.

                  Which you didn’t do, you instead tried to act like the votes of white European countries were the determinants.

                  But let’s forget the term “genocide”.

                  No, you used it, stand by it.

                  • paholg@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    I do stand by it. But it’s not an interesting discussion for me to just go back and forth on a definition.

                    I’m trying to understand if we can agree on basic facts. I suspect that we cannot, which means there’s not much point in having any discussion. But I’m open to the chance that we can.