• fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    That’s because the COBOL OGs are retired/ing and the industry has been training young people telling them “yeah, sorry, this is all we can pay you”. Here in Europe, they’ll take unemployed people from a different industry, put them on a training course, and bang! you’ve got a grateful new dev who doesn’t know how much they are worth.
    You just gotta keep spreading the message. I keep happily sharing my salary, especially with younger, less experienced devs, so we can all win better.

      • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        For real. Even just talking to your fellow coding monkeys helps. It’s ironic that for example here in France, despite all our workers rights and revolutionary tradition, speaking about your salary is still a social faux-pas. And who benefits? Certainly not us.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yo if you are doing COBOL systems maintenance for 90k you arent charging enough.

    That’s all this meme means. Consultants on COBOL maintenance can make 90k in a week. This is not the area where companies pinch pennies.

    • odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      A lot of banks have bootcamps where they pick up unemployed people who might not have ever had tech experience in their life. They teach them COBOL and mainframe basics in a few months, and, if they do well, give them a shitty $60k annual job.

      Source: know someone who went to one of these bootcamps and now works for a major us bank.

      • djehuti@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        This has been going on for decades. My dad became a COBOL programmer in 1980ish after taking an aptitude test in answer to a newspaper ad. Y2K consulting was a pretty good gig.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    At what point does the cost of tech migration outweigh the cost of training people on a more and more specialist paid language just to not have to migrate to a memory safe higher level language like C or Go or Rust or Lua.

    Didn’t say python because oh sweet Jesus the slowdown alone would grind the global economy to a halt if we were running all our banking software on Python XD

  • planetaryprotection@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I once applied for a “database admin” job at one of the big credit card companies. The job description was basically “run all our Oracle databases” and the salary was in the mid 2 millions USD, but I assumed that figure was typo’ed or something ( an extra 0 maybe?)

    In the interview I learned that there was no typo and it was to be one of the seven people on the planet that run the databases for this credit card processor. They said “if the database goes down then we are losing billions of dollars a minute”.

    Anyways I didn’t get the job, but they’re not all underpaid.

  • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    There is no relationship between what you earn and your skill level. If there were, theoretical physics would be a top paying field. The reason is, this is capitalism and we are horrible negotiators. If you want to earn top money in a technical field, the best you can do is insert yourself in a revenue stream. Roles that are critical to revenue like a billing system or associated with a intrinsically valuable commodity e.g. petrochemical, are more lucrative than other similarly skilled professions.

    • linuxdweeb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It feels like blaming everything on capitalism is a Lemmy meme.

      EDIT: smh look at all the capitalists smashing the downvote button as if it were a poor.

  • frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    I swear to god, companies are nowadays just picking the solution with the most buzzwords. Any compiler engineering student knows how to write a transpiler from one language to another, while getting this right is a cumbersome task, it still completly automated afterwards. Just hire a few compiler engineering phds and the job is done in at least half a year.

    Look what i found after a quick google search:

    • yggdar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You want to translate COBOL to another language? That exists as a commercial product! The complexity is not the syntax though, it is the environment and subsystems surrounding the code. A lot of COBOL is designed for mainframe systems, and emulating a mainframe is complex.

      You also end up with code that is still written as if it were COBOL. The syntax for COBOL is the easy part and that is all you can easily replace. Afterwards you’re still stuck with the way of working and mindset, both of which are quite peculiar.

      The company I work for recently looked at all of this, and we decided not to translate our code.

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Just make the devs learn the language if they don’t know it already. What kind of shitty mid to senior dev can’t learn a new language in a reasonable amount of time.

  • ChiefSinner@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    In my experiemce, Java shoots processing usage up while COBOL uses much lesser CPU / memory