• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Embracer at least had the excuse of fucking up their capital and shitting the bed in terms of having money on hand.

    They were forced to shutter and sell things because they legitimately couldn’t fund their operation.

    It was still their fault, because they stupidly bought up developers thinking big investor money was coming, which then just didn’t.

    Microsoft has no such excuse. MS leadership has been asked multiple times why they did it, and they literally haven’t said a single fucking word that makes sense.

    • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      20 days ago

      I’ve heard its because of the games anti-corporate message.

      But even as someone who blames their boomer-ass wintel admin coworkers for allowing AD to EEE its way into enterprise IT, I have a hard time buying that. That game was making too much money for that.

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 days ago

        That’s probably not it, lol. You think some execs care about a games anti corp message if they are making money off of it? I highly doubt it

        • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          20 days ago

          Yeah that’s why I said I don’t really buy the excuse myself, its just the only thing I could think of that really even starts to make sense.

          And even then its far-fetched as shit.

          • kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            I would sooner believe it was some internal politics/dick swinging, they may have upset someone higher up and they swung their dick around and shut their shit down, just out of spite.

      • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        That makes no sense.

        Vandeley wasn’t always evil. Roxanne, Peppermint, Macaron, Korsica, all wanted the company to do good, and for a long while it did.

        Vandeley only became “evil” because Kale mind-controlled Roxanne and made himself CEO.

        I don’t know how that’s anti-corporate. A big part of the plot is that Vandeley grew so successful because it was a genuinely good company doing good things in the world, loved by all, before it became a dystopian world-conquering device at the hands of a villain.