• Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        1 month ago

        Ugh, 3 factorial is most definitely not equal to π. It’s something more like, idk, 9? Honestly I don’t even know how I got here; I majored in Latin and barely past

          • Gordon Calhoun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            1 month ago

            e = π = σ = ε = µ = Avogadro’s Number = k = g = G = α = i = j = 3

            (at least that’s how they all look when viewed from ∞)

            • andros_rex@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Shouldn’t have i in there, or j if you’re using that to represent the imaginary number. The complex plane is separate.

              Let epsilon be substantially greater than zero…

                • andros_rex@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  Imaginary numbers are best understood as symbolizing rotation. If we’re imagining a number line here, “looking back from infinity” - at a scale where Grahams number looks like the mass of an atom expressed in kilograms, i would not be in that infinite set of numbers, it would be a point above that line and creating a perpendicular plane to it.

                  I hate the term “imaginary” because it’s misleading. Most high school algebra teachers don’t understand what they are either, so people learn about these things called “imaginary” numbers, never learn any applications with them, hopefully graph them at best, and then move on understanding nothing new about math.

                  Students also tend to get really confused about it as possibly a variable, (it’s really annoying with in second year algebra courses, where e and logs also show up). We say “ah yeah, if you get a negative sign, just pull it out as an i and don’t worry about it. or just say no real solutions.”

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      1 month ago

      Mathematically yes. Practically, right now? No.

      So you need a resistor of this value for your widget.

      For that many places of precision you’re looking at a potentiometer with a 10 nano-ohm precision.

      I am not aware of any commercially available resistor that can do that but you could create one using microelectronic structures used for ICs and derive a 10 nano-ohm resistor by design and then chain enough of these elements into a resistor network or potentiometer to create the super precise resistance value you want.

      Cool, congratulations.

      Now how are you going to use this 10 nano-ohm resistor? What voltage will you be applying across it? What current do you expect it to handle? And therefore what are your power requirements? What are your tolerances, how much can the true value deviate from the designed ideal?

      Because power generates heat through losses, and that will affect the resistance value so how tightly do you need to manage the power dissipation?

      How will you connect to this resistor to other circuit components? Because a super precise resistor on it’s own is nothing but an over-engineered heating element.

      If you tried connecting other surface mount devices (SMDs) from the E24 or even E96 series to this super precise resistor then the several orders of magnitude wider tolerances of these other components alone will swallow any of the precision from your super accurate resistor.

      So now your entire circuit has to be made to the same precision else all of your design work has been wasted.

      Speaking of which, now your heat management solution now needs to be super precise as well and before you know it you’ve built the world’s most accurate widget that probably took billions of dollars/euros/schmeckles and collaboration from the worlds leading engineers and scientists that probably cost more time and money than the Large Hadron Collider.

    • takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Sure, except the resistance will constantly change with time, temperature and other environmental variables.

    • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      I had a potentiometer on a circuit board that adjusted a timer, but I found that the timer varied in timing. I ended up replacing with a few resistors and it corrected the variations.

  • deranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Numbers like that are why I quit majoring in mechanical engineering. Physics took the beauty of math and made it ugly.

    You knew something was wrong in calculus when you got a fucked up coefficient that wasn’t a nice number.

      • GoatTnder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’ve heard a story (so like 4th hand at this point) where an astrophysicist was talking about galaxy rotations or something. “And for this model, we can simplify pi to 10.”

        • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          30 days ago

          My thermodynamics professor made so approximations in his derivations that all of his equations had an “O” term to represent the inaccuracy. Every time he made another approximation he’d say “and, of course, the O sucks up the error”.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      After calculus though, they just expect you to cope with fucked up coefficients. In Diff Eq, sometimes you do just get something like 3/111 cos (6/111 x). It gets harder to come up with examples that work out with nice integers.

      Physics can also have some really beautiful math, look at Lissajous figures. Once you understand the connections between e, the imaginary plane, and sine/cosine, you get some profound understandings about how electric and magnetic fields work.

  • frezik@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 month ago

    That level of precision in a resistor would literally be thrown off if you breathed on it. If you actually needed that, then you need to build an extremely controlled environment around it. Even then, the heat from the electricity itself would throw it off. Maybe in a liquid nitrogen bath?

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      30 days ago

      First, assume a spherical resistor in a vacuum, that can also dissipate heat with 100% efficiency.

      Now that we’re in physics land, anything is possible.

    • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      A big aspect of good design is being able to solve an issue as succinctly as possible, with as wide an operating range as possible. Lower tolerance requirements = better.

      If you need that level of precision, you might want to reconsider your career in circuit design.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        You can’t tell me that there isn’t a good reason that 0.001% resistors exist. Otherwise why sell them?

        • JayDee@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          30 days ago

          4 Sig figs vs 9 Sig figs is a big gap. If you need your resistors in a circuit to be precise to 9 Sig figs, seek a new career.

          It is almost always possible to take a system and make it more precise by using more precise parts (just gotta make sure you know what part you are changing to improve what tolerance). You do get diminishing returns with that, but it beats inventing a new system if the tolerances you need are just alittle ways away.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    i miss old school radioshack. i did not know what all those bins of tiny electronic hobby parts were for, but I desperately wanted to learn. I did eventually but you have to get all your stuff from some shady oligarch.

    • tacobellhop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah we’re living in the ruins of the old America already and have been for like 25 years.

      It’s dirty they just use the same business names they did in the 20th century. While making smoke and mirrors versions of the old products.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      30 days ago

      i did not know what all those bins of tiny electronic hobby parts were for, but I desperately wanted to learn.

      From what I understand, prior to the personal computer boom of the 1980’s, HAM radio was kind of a big deal with nerds. The parts were there for all manner of electronics tinkering, but a big mainstay was building and modifying radios. Yeah, you had people tinkering with computers in the 1970’s too, but it was more niche (until it wasn’t).

  • hardcoreufo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 month ago

    The only application I can think of off the top of my head that would require that precision is a R2R DAC.

    Just sort through a bin until you find one.

  • A_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Quantum Ampere Standard
    https://www.nist.gov/noac/technology/current-and-voltage/quantum-ampere-standard
    .
    there also been research for defining a quantum volt and quantumly stable resistors

    https://www.nist.gov/noac/technology/current-and-voltage
    Quantum-based measurements for voltage and current are moving toward greater miniaturization

    P.S. :
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_Hall_effect
    Quantum Hall effect →
    Applications →
    Electrical resistance standards :

    (…) Later, the 2019 revision of the SI fixed exact values of h and e, resulting in an exact
    RK = h/e2 = 25812.80745… Ω.

    (this is precise to at least 10 significant digits)