This must be why the UAE is such an egalitarian country… 😅
i mean, leaders of theocracies blatantly ignoring the parts of their religion that they don’t like is nothing new lol
Hence why all religions should be abolished.
We don’t need religions to do basic taxes. Just keep upping those brackets until you reach 100% of income and 50% of ownership per year. See how fast the rich become normal people
Ah yes straight up remove religious freedom. What a reasonable idea
I find having the right to have the mindset of a 5 year old bit very compelling. I’d rather have the universal right to internet access, that will give humanity much more benefits.
Theocracies should be abolished. You aren’t abolishing my religion, though.
Back in the day Christians took care for the sick and the homeless, they built orphanages and hospitals for the mentally ill. The amount of Christians didn’t decrease but the way these vulnerable people were cared for changed greatly. The more we have a society were we pay the government to solve these issues, the less we need charity.
I don’t know if Zakat-evasion is a problem in islamic countries, but I guess if we change the rules to get the billionaires to pay the ones evading taxes now will just change their tactics and continue to give a shit about the rest of society.
I mean, they did but abuse was also rampant in those orphanages and mental hospitals.
Sure, it’s great, but humans have proven time and again that religion causes more abuses over time than not. Yes, tax the rich. Using a religious text to justify it is weird. I do actually appreciate the info as I didn’t know this about Islam, but in the same vein it’s still religion which inherently leads to systems of abuse and shitting on people in the name of a deity. Not that humans aren’t good enough at doing that without religion, but I feel religion just gives them more of a reason when believing they’re serving some higher power.
Zekat is often seen as giving money to others, but it’s just any act of love towards another person.
It’s become muddled with money too much in these modern times.
That being said, yes please, tax the rich.
Our sister company is Zakat approved and runs water trucks in Gaza using the funds that people donate
What company is that?? Sounds amazing.
Dont want the name out here, but PMd it to you.
The individual must realize that he is no more than the steward of this property, which is fundamentally the possession of society; this must make him accept the restrictions that the system lays upon his liberty, and the bounds that limit his rights of disposal. On the other side, society must realize its fundamental right to such property and must thus become bolder in prescribing the regulations and in laying down the laws which concern it. Thus only may we arrive at principles that will ensure complete social justice in the profitable use of property, which cannot be an end in itself nor a subject of actual ownership. The clearest instance of this is the matter of the tenure of land; thought cannot conceive that any man should be the owner of the land itself; all that he can possess is its irrigation and its crops, which means that the matter is one of the profitable use of a possession rather than one of actual ownership.
Sayyid Qutb spends much of this chapter in Social Justice in Islam insisting that it’s not full on socialism, but it’s definitely not free market capitalism.
In part, he has to write a lot about how not socialist he is because of the popularity of Islamic socialist movements. They were huge players in Egypt and Iran.
One can debate how those inspired by Qutb have kept to his ideas, but the society he describes is very much focused on ensuring everyone has enough to eat. (It’s also a society where I end up stoned to death in a public square, so you win some you lose some.)
Islam at least also forbids interest. There’s a complicated banking system, and I’m pretty sure there still are ways to fuck people over, but getting broke people trapped on the payday loan cycle at least isn’t one.
interesting. i had heard that Islam does apparently not have private land ownership (?) and a friend told me that 200 years ago, they didn’t even have actual borders between countries (and, i assume, villages or administrative districts?) thus it was all a continuous area with names and region designations being rather vague. i wonder whether that has to do with the idea that land cannot be possessed by some kind of monarch or king? do you know more about this?
A couple of other interesting discussions about different types of property rights in that article too. Critical to keep in mind that it’s a religion and that there are multiple traditions/legal schools of thought. (Shia versus Sunni is the biggest rift, but there are others.)
Fear of Islamic socialism was why the US kept the Shah in power.
As far land borders - that is seriously a huge and complicated and difficult topic. (Numismatic research - coins - often shows how often we don’t really have documentation of what was happening. Kingdoms that are only known to exist because they put out a few pieces…) That’s the kind of topic that people do post doc work on.
Let’s see MBS give away money.
Higher chance he dies from a lightning strike inside his palace lmao
We would be better off disallowing organized religion in public and forcefully redistributing all excess wealth perpetually.
No, we should built impenetrable wall between the state and religion, but right to believe and exercise religion is a very fundamental and basic human right.
There’s no free speech issue here.
You can practice religion.
That’s not what I said.
You are not a victim.
You don’t get to have a tax exempt public building where you get to contort the minds of your neighbors into killing minorities.
No more organized religion.
Do it in your house, keep your cult shit out of our public spaces and don’t indoctrinate children.
You are not a victim
And what next? Ban political expression in public? Ban protests? Ban unions? Banning free public assembly, including for religious purposes, is a one way ticket towards dictatorship.
No, just religon.
This is already done in a ton of countries.
They know they can’t stop cult activity but at least they discourage it and force it into private
You shouldn’t even be going to church unless you’re illiterate, that’s why pastors existed, because they could read
If you can read and are truely faithful then you don’t need a 2nd master or peer pressure from the other congregation to stay committed.
Just have your own private relationship with god and keep it away from my kids.
What nations are the ‘ton of countries’?
redistributing all excess wealth perpetually.
what would keep it from re-flowing into the hands of a few?
The perpetual part.
We should also add a clause where anyone trying to unbalance wealth again dies.
Religious persecution and withdrawing of the first amendment.
Some folks would rather destroy unequivocally, if you can shut down one group - all can be shutdown. That’s literally what most right wing governments do and exploit, by separating certain people and wantingly ending their ability.
Once it is done, it can be done again and again, each time the lines blur and each times more will suffer.
You talk as a we, parroting the same talking points everyone else already says and believes. So what can you do in your day?
I made a homeless man be honest with me through words alone, I have defended another from himself. He was going to attack a white man with a bikelock for being verbally attacked for his race. When was the last time you traveled as man? To see your rotten upon the streets and acted in care for those truly suffering the wealth gap? Or is it just for you?
What have you done constructive for mankind if you so want them to endure? Is it just to impede?
Nah if they want to run a little cult where everyone thinks what a leader tells them they can do it in their own homes or make their own Jonestown.
They can’t do it publicly and they don’t get tax breaks for it.
Nobody is stopping you from practicing religion, just your victim complex.
Being able to publicly express their opinions, even religion, is a human right and fundamental constitutional right in any democracy. Stripping it would strip the country of freedom of speech and democracy as whole.
Lmao so is freedom of (and from) religion.
If Christians want to force religon down our throats and our childrens throats we are banning that shit next time the pendulum swings
Fuck cultists, live in reality
Nobody is forcing you to excerise religion. It is your right to dunk on it, to hate it, but you cannot prohibit its exercise. Yes, cultists shoving it down their children’s throats is a problem, but that can be solved with overturning Yoder and focusing in prevention in the education system.
You’re not oppressed
You don’t need a pastor to tell you what to think, just read the book yourself and don’t be lazy.
Banning organized religion means you and your cult members cannot organize and fuck up the world for the rest of us.
There are already several countries that do this and it works great to keep religion out of public policy.
“Obligatory charity.” Is that what the kids are calling it these days?
It’s just how Zakat is structured in Islam. “Tax” would also work, but Zakat is specifically earmarked for social welfare (and military uses) so obligatory charity captures the nuance better I think.
Military uses? How’s that charity?
So that was an oversimplification; Quran 9:60 specifies the eight recipients of Zakat, and one of them is “for the sake of God”, which has been interpreted by most (but not all) scholars to refer to providing supplies and arms to non-professional (conscripted or volunteer) soldiers during Jihad. Some scholars have been more expansive of their interpretation of this, but that’s the majority opinion. This might seem out of place, which is fair but consider a situation where a Muslim state has to go to war but doesn’t have the funds to raise an army and as a result loses territory. As far as I understand it’s basically a wartime “oh shit” button.
Elmo give 2.5% of his wealth?
Fuck that shit.
At best people like him should get to KEEP 2.5 % of their wealth. More reasonable, likely, will be TJ jail them as few billionaires can claim to gave gotten there without stepping on the back of someone. Elmo personally should be jailed for life.
Also, we don’t need religions for tax. Just tax the rich fucking bastards
Elmo give 2.5% of his wealth?
You seem to be misreading.
Give 2.5% of their wealth, each year, not just give 2.5% of their income. There’s a huge difference.
Wealth gets taxed every year, unlike income which gets taxed only once. So in 20 years, the wealth tax is roughly 20*2.5% which is 50%. And in 30 years it’s closer to 75%.
That is exactly what I’m saying.
2.5% of his wealth is nothing, he quite easily gains or loses ten times that in a year
Set a maximum amount of wealth per person each year. Anything you earn over that automatically goes into a 100% bracket.
There literally is no reason why one person should be allowed to have a billion dollars in wealth, whilst another person is homeless and needs to waddle into crime to be able to feed themselves
10 million total wealth. That sounds like a reasonably sane maximum anyone should ever have the power over. Anything above that, taxes.
10 million total wealth
sounds reasonable IMO
But it is not 0.025*50. It is 0.975^20.
is roughly the same
the first results in 0.5, the second one in ~0.6.
but you’re right, from an analysis point of view.
I think Bill Gates and the Gates Foundation pledge means keeping only 7% of annual income and it’s still too much.
Anything over 10 million should be automatically 100% tax
deleted by creator
That’s a tax.
But are you sure really rich people should have to pay it? /s
Did you read the title?
One of the recipients of Zakat funds are islamic terrorists. Not a horrible idea in principle though, but I think it’s much more interesting that Swiss cantons have wealth taxes, because, you know, because Switzerland is a pretty decently working economy. In stark contrast to almost every muslim nation out there.
European don’t be racist challenge, literally impossible
Please inform me which part of my comment you imagined to be racist.
Mostly the beginning. But also the end
deleted by creator
“It’s not racist if it’s true!!!”-ass comment.
Is terrorist what you call all brown people?
- The Poor (Al-Fuqara):
Those who do not possess enough wealth to meet their basic needs.
- The Needy (Al-Masakin):
Individuals face financial hardship but have some resources that are insufficient to cover their necessities.
- Those Employed to Administer Zakat (Al-Aamileen):
Individuals employed to collect, manage, and distribute Zakat.
- Those Whose Hearts are to be Reconciled (Al-Mu’allafat al-Quloob):
Individuals who are inclined towards Islam or those whose hearts need to be softened towards the Muslim community.
- Those in Bondage (slaves and captives) (Fir-Riqab):
To help free individuals from slavery or captivity.
- Debtors (Al-Gharimeen):
Those in debt who cannot settle their debts with their current resources.
- In the Cause of Allah (Fi Sabilillah):
Individuals engaged in activities that benefit the broader Muslim community, such as scholars, educators, and those defending the Muslim community.
- The Wayfarer (Ibn Sabil):
Travelers or strangers who are in need while away from their homes.
Seems bribery.
Bribery for what
i’m between downvoting because it mentions “terrorists” (which are often just people trying to do right) and upvoting because it’s interesting information that switzerland has a wealth tax. i didn’t know that.
What’s wrong with the word “terrorist” in this context?
In 2023, Elon Musk paid $11 billion in income taxes, which was one of the largest individual tax bills in history.
Which is more than 2,5% of his total wealth.
In 2021, Elon Musk paid a significant amount in taxes, with estimates ranging from $8.3 billion to $12 billion, making it one of the largest individual tax payments in U.S. history. This substantial tax bill was primarily due to Musk exercising stock options that were set to expire, which triggered a large taxable income event.
Blablabla. Basically, believe it or not. 2,5% isn’t that big of a deal
I also read there was a year he paid $0, but even if he payed on average 2.5% yoy, that might relatively be a lot less than what someone working minimum pays on wealth (or in their case just income) tax.
In the US, people making minimum wage pay $0 in income tax in almost all states.
Am just saying the islamic stuff is peanuts. 2,5% isn’t much. That’s already more than happening.
Elon musk is paying that much on his yearly income. I’m just comparing it to his total wealth.
A lot of his wealth are unrealised capital gains. His total wealth crippled this year with his shenanigans.
If this happened in USA. Then they’d relocate their wealth to other places while only keeping the bare minimum in order to generate an income there.
USA’s average wealth is insanely high because it’s a government that protects their wealth. Once it stops doing that, they will re-locate.
Your 1% holding the most of your country’s wealth isn’t actually holding your country’s wealth. But that of the whole world. Your country is just a safe place to keep it.
deleted by creator
Yes, i do believe that poor people’s lives become better if you provide them with extra resources.
deleted by creator
If tax payers money go to bombs for Israel it wouldn’t be Zakat
The fuck does that have to do with anything?
