• dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Personally I find that feature (including tabs in general) very helpful and is something i’d expect from a text editor in the 20th century.

    Just my opinion. To each their own, but just wanted to share that it might also be many others’ opinion too.

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      48 minutes ago

      I think I’d be able to agree with you if new notepad didn’t take a noticeable time to load. It used to be the 2nd fastest thing I could launch, after the Run dialog itself.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Meh, sounds like a worse version of notepad++, which has been very popular and reliable since the early 21st century.

      If they make notepad more bloated than notepad++ then I’d use it even less.

      But each to their own.

    • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I like how the tabs save when I close notepad. Its super helpful when I just need to jot down some quick notes or a serial number or something.

      And I’m really dumb so I often close my notepad window before I’m done and this feature has saved me numerous times.

      I don’t have copilot in my notepad tho. Which is good.

      • MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The best part is that it even retains unsaved documents (and unsaved changes in existing ones), which makes it very feasible to use Notepad as sort of an extended clipboard. Surprisingly good thinking for Microsoft.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      In the 20th century I’d expect something that can open, edit and save plaintext files. But we’re 1/4th of the way into the 21st century.

      I find I have two uses for a plaintext editor: plaintext, and computer script. I don’t like using rich text editors like Word for writing notes and such because the formatting options just get in the way; plaintext lets me “just write.” And for this, there’s very little automation that will be helpful.

      In the Linux ecosystem, plaintext editors are all trying so hard to be IDEs. They’ll close parentheses or quotes or whatever for you, and if you’re doing something like 15" to mean fifteen inches you’ll get two, you’ll hit backspace and it’ll take both away…it doesn’t help.

      If I’m programming anything of any size I’m going to open an IDE, probably because I’m working within some ecosystem. If I’m writing a couple lines of Bash I’ll probably use Vim. So I’d rather tune my plaintext editor to write actual .txt files, as prose.

        • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That would fall under “computer script.”

          I am either:

          • Writing in plain human English, in which case I need a PLAIN TEXT editor. Maybe I want spell check and stuff like that in it.
          • Writing computer code, for which I’ll use a code editor or IDE. Maybe I want syntax highlighting and bracket closing and auto indent here.