You must log in or register to comment.
Clearly would have one leg per column - joint at the top row
A matrix is already wearing chaps and needs no additional leg wear.
Wearable for infinite matrices
If either, a symmetric matrix would stop being symmetric and would hence not be able to wear pants. With this conclusion in mind I propose that symmetric matrices are from now on called naked matrices instead.
My matrices wear Hilbert Pants
C vs Fortran
Why are we not considering the matrix as a whole, but as a fucking snake or something?
Both - one leg each way.
That is a pant, not pants
It would wear it in the direction of the matrix determinant calculation, the right leg on the positive direction and the left leg on the negative
eigenpants
