You must log in or register to comment.
A matrix is already wearing chaps and needs no additional leg wear.
Clearly would have one leg per column - joint at the top row
Wearable for infinite matrices
If either, a symmetric matrix would stop being symmetric and would hence not be able to wear pants. With this conclusion in mind I propose that symmetric matrices are from now on called naked matrices instead.
My matrices wear Hilbert Pants
C vs Fortran
Both - one leg each way.
That is a pant, not pants
Why are we not considering the matrix as a whole, but as a fucking snake or something?
It would wear it in the direction of the matrix determinant calculation, the right leg on the positive direction and the left leg on the negative
eigenpants
