You must log in or register to comment.
used to really enjoy calling men whores until I just found out I can refer to my homies as concu🅱️inus
Concubanus
gazundheit
analist
🧐
That’s when my boss doesn’t “agree” with the data so he pulls a number out of his ass.
💀💀💀
Half analyst, half therapist… it’s the … Analrapist!
Rapanalist!
one who analyses or gets analysed hard
deleted by creator
Ok straight people, y’all should know that not every bottom is a twink.
There’s also twunk - a twink and a hunk. A twink with muscles but still hairless, incredibily smooth. A twank on the other hand, a twank is no good. That’s a twink and a skank. Essentially just a ragdoll being passed around from twink to twunk to bear to otter…
It’s very difficult to maintain the lifestyle of a twank-versatile because this often leads to a lot of self-hatred and denial, especially among the political or religious types, so they try to realign their sexual orientation through therapy.
A twank-versatile? That’s impressive
As a straight guy, some of those seem kinda mean. I thought, they liked their twinks.
To my gay brothers, are they mean? Or am I just too straight to get it?
They liked their twinks like many men today like their women.
I.e. they don’t like them as people. But they enjoy their bodies.
People loved to fuck them but didn’t value them. Like how people are about prostitutes
No they did not. The roman republic was very similar to modern America except the guy who ruined it was a bisexual hobag who seemed to care about the proleterii. As a note, it would be culturally improper to refer to a Roman man who exclusively tops men and women as bisexual, but a man who bottoms for men as well as topping women would fit that term. Julius Caesar’s bisexuality was a political scandal, and he was referred to by his political opponents as “every woman’s man and every man’s woman”.
Rome loved twinks like America loves trans women, the sex industry and political world tell wildly different stories, and there was cultural back and forth between “hell yeah” “fucking degenerates” and “lol f@g”
So you’re saying the Romans already used “Sick!” as a descriptor two millennia ago?
1000 years of Romans so I’ll be surprised if they haven’t used all of our slang at some point.
Some roman out there uttered the phrase “skibidi foricai”
Quod est morbosus malusque!
There is a secret ruling class and they are known as the Effeminati.
puer is just the regular word for boy, as in ”young male” without any sexual connotation.
Words can mean different things with different tones and contexts.
Oh that one? He’s a guy. But him over there <points> he’s a boy <wink>
A lot of these are just regular words that could also be used for twinkies (especially puer seems funny, calling twink a literal boy).
But we still see influences from the Roman empire today - in financial industry entry positions are often (junior) analyst.
it’s not that well-known so i don’t blame the tweeter, but the word starting with E is a slur. i’m not sure if there’s an exact replacement, though, because “Inuit” only refers to one community out of I think three?
I think it’s ok and we can say exoletus, it’s a dead language.
I believe Inuit refers to all three whereas the word above typically excludes Aleuts
How uh young were they before I make any remarks
Exactly as young as you think unfortunately. They did have slavery, so probably without consent too.
Wonder where the Roman Catholic Church gets it from.
The altar boys, unfortunately.
Ha!
I giggled and kicked my feet like a schoolgirl at this, thanks
Why am I reading each word like AMOGUS?
i wonder whether the italian word “la moglie” (the wife) comes from “mollia”, i.e. “the soft one”.
Should be from mulier which means woman in Latin, but maybe the mulier word itself is related?
There is also “Molly” in English but supposedly it has no relation etymologically
pullus - puella?
Wait does calling girls “chicks” really go all the way back to Latin?
and calling guys “girl” in gay culture
