Some of us just buy dirt to throw on the ground outside our house too.

We really pay to just move stuff around a lot.

I understand fighting fire with fire, but dont mind me while I dont praise the arsonists.

Meh, I’m poor and have no assets at all. Guess I just die.

Both sides are getting their clippable audio snippets and dragging around audiences to feel like they are fighting with them.

I truly don’t agree that platforming extremists to argue against them for publicity and money is ever worth it. The sides lean against each other to grow larger and these are people who it is in their financial interests to not change their opinion. And religion debates are not productive, those are personal and faith based. Can’t argue someone rationally out of something that wasnt rationally entered.

You asked about qnaline, not Tucker.

Not directly but I will call it an homage to it. Cause they are still platforming the extremists.

Its why no one thought Bill Nye’s debates with creationists were a good idea.

I clicked on it and the first video recommended was a thumbnail of two guys sitting in front of microphones looking like that last image with the title “the bible is true cause it says so?”

So… Yes. Very much so.

Same, the first moment I saw this gremlin I knew I was gonna have to defend some f-ed up stuff.
I just love these comics.

You know what? I think I have heard that recently?

Yeah that was the takeaway and the ick factor I had initially.

Like if they played up the absurdism and had a joke more than “well now I’m horny, but pretending I’m upset even though I made the joke” I think there could have been something. The whole set up for that… Yeesh.

Alright I think I got over the ick factor enough to just see this as a pretty good answer to this.

Listen

Read

Oh man if only…

But let me loop back to you about this when we figure out our org goals

I just miss people talking about something they know in an organized and professional manner.

I just don’t care for random string of consciousness to pretend I am part of a conversation I can’t actually participate in.

See above comic.

Its fine, I just literally passed it around my friends asking for help with the joke because I literally don’t get it being… anything other than a;
“man if I had a goth girl I could just pee in her mouth instead of the bathroom” joke. Like that could even be funny to me I guess but this format just felt… Like they drew her on her knees first and invented a scenario around it after. And I haven’t found anything redeeming in it.

Don’t get me wrong worse stuff is posted but this one still just hits me in all the wrong ways, from the lackluster punchline to the the frustrated walk off and the art style feeling cloned from other artists like Adam Ellis.

I don’t like to think something is bad if it is not for me but I think I’m just frustrated by this one since it feels, off. And I’m just searching for what I am missing, cause it feels professionally bad.

Nope, just still not getting it.

The joke is that he likes peeing in her mouth enough that he should want to do it in public?

The joke still just reads to me that this is what the author masturbated to before posting. But 🎨 Artsy 🧑‍🎨

“Exposure therapy” is exposing someone to their fear in a safe space, so idea is she’s representing what he fears (public bathrooms) and the safe space is her mouth in a grocery store.

This literally just reads as a fetish. I don’t get a joke.

No implications of this being public

They are at a grocery store.

As someone that hates cross promotional slop for pandering and never knowing any of the names of people behind the scenes…

Yeah this sounds vaguely like a conversation I have had more than once. Just needs a bunch more hyper specific nouns eitha a registered trademark that means nothing like
I can’t believe they just teased Schlizmit™ in the Orbese™ location for the second film!

Why do people think I know these names?!