you looking at this while trying to decipher it means you’re the third member of this staredown

    • three@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because she’s 8, depicted as wearing a thong, and the picture is insinuating that she wants an animal to squirt water at her vagina and asshole.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        9 days ago

        Well I’m an oblivious idiot. I thought she was caught literally with her pants down by a wild Pokemon wandering under the stall door and was determined to still catch it anyways

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          8 days ago

          I thought the giveaway here was that the Pokémon is named “Bidet”, but all wild Pokémon are named whatever their species is (“Piplup”), meaning this one is already caught and was given a nickname by its trainer.

        • Sundray@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          9 days ago

          Same here. I was going to say he’s still at green health, no way she’s catching that bidet with a regular ball.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 days ago

        I too like performative anti-pedophillia! I too like describing images of fictional characters in the most gross way possible! It doesn’t have a negative effect on real-life at all, it’s not like there are people who think small breasted women are pedo-bait (save for Collective Shout, who are obviously just a rare anomality and it’s not like they managed to convince the Australian government of their bullshit), because everyone knows the real problem with pedophillia isn’t the long-lasting psychological harm caused by adults fulfilling their desires on people not being able to consent, but attraction to “child-coded” things! And it obviously never was used against LGBTQ+ people!

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 days ago

      Wrong type of cursed content. To be honest, I thought it was implying that she was out of toilet paper, and was going to use the poor penguin. Then I read the name.