you looking at this while trying to decipher it means you’re the third member of this staredown

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      Wrong type of cursed content. To be honest, I thought it was implying that she was out of toilet paper, and was going to use the poor penguin. Then I read the name.

    • three@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 days ago

      Because she’s 8, depicted as wearing a thong, and the picture is insinuating that she wants an animal to squirt water at her vagina and asshole.

      • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        89
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well I’m an oblivious idiot. I thought she was caught literally with her pants down by a wild Pokemon wandering under the stall door and was determined to still catch it anyways

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I too like performative anti-pedophillia! I too like describing images of fictional characters in the most gross way possible! It doesn’t have a negative effect on real-life at all, it’s not like there are people who think small breasted women are pedo-bait (save for Collective Shout, who are obviously just a rare anomality and it’s not like they managed to convince the Australian government of their bullshit), because everyone knows the real problem with pedophillia isn’t the long-lasting psychological harm caused by adults fulfilling their desires on people not being able to consent, but attraction to “child-coded” things! And it obviously never was used against LGBTQ+ people!