• TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    The pyramids were not built by slaves. They were built by farmers during downtime, they were treated well. Pharaohs were living gods, so building for them and getting paid for it mustn’t have been that different from building a cathedral.

    • nexguy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes guys it was fine. You just pretend that you are a god through threat of violence and having an uneducated population then get them to do things for you. It’s great!

        • msage@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Isn’t it like working for Amazon today?

          You work for some pay and all the value goes to the rich person on top.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was a vastly better situation than a lot of wandering tribes had it back then.

          No it wasn’t. Life expectancy was shorter. They had higher instances of domestic violence and stunted growth from disease and malnutrition. The process of sustaining an agricultural economy is grueling, the labor monotonous, and the results of months of labor can be as fickle as the wind. And grain-based diets are fucking horrible for your health - particularly with respect to your teeth and your weight.

          Wandering tribes had it significantly better. That’s why migrant civilizations - from the Hittites to the Persians to the Mongols to the Apache - were such a terror for agricultural communities. They were more fit, often more intelligent (or at least more educated), and because they were more mobile they could outrun regional catastrophes and pounce upon underdeveloped unprepared sedentary populations hundreds of miles away.

          Large agricultural societies were good at one thing and that was getting large numbers of people in a dense community to fuck out kids at a rapid rate. And eventually these large populations developed the industries capable of winning wars of attrition against migrant raiders.

          But this process took millennia. It was iterative and routinely prone to failure. And absent membership in the rarefied elite - the planter class, the aristocracy, the theocracy - you were much better off as a nomad than a serf until perhaps 80-150 years ago, depending on where you were living.

          Depending on how you want to view the world, nomadic peoples are still at the forefront of human civilization. We’ve congealed this cohort of people into institutions we call corporations and militaries. But you better believe the overseas contractor driving a truck or piloting a drone in Iraq is doing way better than the fertile crescent farmers who have been tilling the soil for the last 10,000 years.

        • nexguy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was just responding to someone that said they weren’t slaves when in reality they absolutely were.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        The workers quarters at the Giza necropolis have been excavated, and they found evidence that the work crews lived a pretty high standard of life. Yes, as far as I know other than transporting stones via the Nile they were built with human muscle power, but the men cutting and moving the stones were fed an extremely luxurious diet for the time. Huge numbers of bakeries were found, along with evidence of vegetables, fish, beef…my personal hypothesis is this is a requirement; the Great Pyramid is probably the greatest feat of athleticism ever performed, and you had to feed the men lots of calories, protein, vitamins and minerals to get it done.

        They got healthcare, too. There have been bodies found that showed healed amputations. People got hurt on the job but were cared for as best as they knew how 4,000 years ago.

        Now imagine you’re a young man living in some village in lower Egypt in the 4th dynasty, and a royal messenger shows up recruiting workers to build some big triangle in the West for the king, and they promise wages along with all the beer, bread and steak you can eat made and served by more young women than you knew existed, plus medical and dental. You’d probably go check out the king’s big triangle thing. I’ve taken worse jobs than that.

      • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        They were not forced to do this. It was a privilege, one that actual slaves weren’t allowed. So looking back that makes it a system of a rich guy paying people for his passion project while they didn’t have any other income.

        Not quite communism but it’s as much slavery as any other job.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      They were built by farmers during downtime, they were treated well.

      The Pharaoh’s government would take a tithe of the farmer’s crops during the growing season and hold it in reserve. Farmers then got a share of their deposits back in exchange for doing this backbreaking work in pursuit of the vanity projects of the wealthiest merchant and priest families (of which the Pharaoh’s was the pinnacle).

      Idk what “treated well” is supposed to mean in this context. They were treated about as well as any other laboring people. But the average life expectancy of an Egyptian laborer was late-30s to early-40s. They worked until their bodies gave out and then their kids took over.

      I wouldn’t call any kind of Bronze Age agricultural society benevolent to its working class.

      • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You’re generalizing a few millennia of civilization. That doesn’t really make sense.

        The low life expectancy in Egypt seems cherry picked from one search result you found? Seems to be about a single village with data from about a century? Might as well have been disease. For all its fertility, farming in water comes with big downsides.

        And Egypt has always been surrounded by nomadic tribes. Leaving the kingdom must have been so much easier than leaving capitalism today. But people chose for stability which the pharaoh provided. They weren’t slaves, unlike the actual slaves which they did own.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The low life expectancy in Egypt seems cherry picked from one search result you found? Seems to be about a single village with data from about a century?

          A bit more than that.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Against_the_Grain:_A_Deep_History_of_the_Earliest_States

          Might as well have been disease.

          Animal husbandry is the root cause of a host of common diseases.

          And Egypt has always been surrounded by nomadic tribes. Leaving the kingdom must have been so much easier than leaving capitalism today.

          Traveling by foot across the wilderness into a civilization you know nothing about - not the language nor the customs nor anyone eager to accept you as a foreign migrant?

          Trivial, really. They just used Egypt GPS.

  • atro_city@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    On deathbead, poor as a rock: at least I didn’t slack off and was of value to the economy!