• chaotic_ugly@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      If it wasn’t in the beginning, it was after Folding Ideas/Dan Olson released “Line Goes Up”.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Walking up to a game of Three Card Monte and saying “It’s pretty obvious he’s palmed the Queen” mostly just gets you heckled and chased away.

      Part of the problem with digital spaces is that you’ve got your person setting up the scam, and then you’ve got your layer of people marketing the scam, and then you’ve got your first layer of suckers who think they are coming out ahead on the scam, and then you’ve got the second layer of suckers who all know a tier-one sucker who just got rich. And then you’ve got the bots and the ideologues and the contrarians and the know-it-alls, all repeating the line that the person who set up the scam encourages them to say.

      And it’s over all that cacophony that you announce “It’s obviously a scam”. Then Reddit boots you for violating terms and conditions of the platform.

      • BassTurd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        64
        ·
        30 days ago

        I found value in shitting on people buying them. $0 monetary gain, but at least $10 in schadenfreude.

        • Wilco@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          46
          ·
          30 days ago

          I trolled people by setting their NFT as my avatar in the chat rooms they were in. Im going to value that at $100.

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              29 days ago

              My favorite bit was how basically none of the NFTs included copyright ownership. Like, if it was a quick and easy way to publicly deal in copyright ownership, maybe pointing to a .gov site showing the transfer of ownership to the holder of that specific nft then it would actually be useful and maybe even worth something. But nah, they were treating digital assets like physical paintings and hoping rarity of an infinitely copiable object was value.

          • VoiHyvaLuojaMitaNyt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            30 days ago

            I’ve been watching a lot of Antiques Roadshow clips and I imagined one of the appraisers doing a valuation of your shenanigans.

            “You bought this magnificent piece sillyness when and for how much?”

            “oh I just copypasted it to my profile for no money at all”

            “Well that was very good deal indeed, because on in todays money the entertainment value alone is in the hundreds of pounds.”

        • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          30 days ago

          Putting a dollar figure on your schadenfreude? Do you want a block chain based “prediction market” for schadenfreude? That’s how you get a block chain based “prediction market” for schadenfreude.

          • BassTurd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            30 days ago

            Yes, as long as I’m on the receiving end of the pump and dump. In the end, I’ll only be taking money from people that clearly have too much. I’ll donate some to some good charity so it’s not a bad thing

    • The_Almighty_Walrus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      30 days ago

      I actually got a free NFT in some kind of sweepstakes. It’s probably worth negative money now.

      It did get me 3 free drinks at a music festival so there’s like +50 bucks in value right there.

  • galoisghost@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    30 days ago

    Under a grand. Is there anyone really stupid enough to think this is still worth anything at all?

    • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      30 days ago

      I would actually pay like $100 to say I own the EFT some moron paid millions of dollars for. I’ve bought dumber things. I paid real money for a 100 trillion dollar zimbabwe bill that is completely worthless. Great for cocaine! I’ve also paid hundreds of dollars for 1 night of cocaine, dozens of times, and have nothing to show for any of them.

      • leoj@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        Yeah i was thinking that the other day when they were talking about an 11 million dollar EFT now valued at 100 USD.

        I was like, shit, I’d pay 100 USD for that one.

        • prettybunnys@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          30 days ago

          Plus imagine if another bubble came and some donkey was willing to pay a ton for it again for some dumb reason.

          A 100 dollar meme like that would be worth it IMO.

          • leoj@piefed.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            30 days ago

            feels akin to my GME shares, I just wanted to be included in the fun LOL.

            BRB gonna go buy all the rump coins from the bag holders.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          T’would be funny if this kind of demand drove the prices back up. Not to money laundering levels, but like to like $180 or something.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        You can just say you did that without having to pay the money, the only thing you’d be missing is a website (that probably won’t be around much longer) confirming you did that. That’s kinda why NFTs didn’t work.

  • ozoned@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    What? You mean digital art that infinitely reproducible, can’t actually be owned, WASN’T the next big thing? Oh jeez. I hope the metaverse succeeds and if not then AI surely will RIGHT?!?!

  • expatriado@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    30 days ago

    but for a brief period of time, some people made some money, while most participants lost

    edit: do AI next

  • fierysparrow89@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    30 days ago

    As with everything crypto this was a huge scam. Besides the obvious profiting from gullable idiots, the other use case is to illegally funnel money.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      30 days ago

      Not absolutely everything in crypto is a scam, though 99% of it is, and I will definitely agree with you there. But there is 1% that is actually trying to do something useful, and you’ve got to be able to find that 1% and not throw it out with the bath water.

      • fierysparrow89@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        The silver lining is that after the obligatory exploitation by grifters, every new technology of this caliber finally gets a more positive use in our lifes. Maybe somewhat naive, but I think we (ie. our societies) have payed ~50% of the tuition fee as far as crypto is concerned. So hopefully we’ll be able to absorb the tech in our collective lives soon.

        Ps: Different topic, but using the same metaphor for AI, I’m afraid we’re just at the begin of its initial fallout.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          I think the rise of Monero over Bitcoin is a very positive sign. Since it has privacy, the government absolutely cannot stand the fact that it exists, and therefore, institutions don’t want to touch it. This means the “number go up”, “to the moon”, and “compliance”, shmucks are all driven away in horror and you are left with the real core who want to see a better money in a digital world. If that sounds interesting, you might want to listen to “darknet Market Maximalism” a manifesto by xenu. You can listen to the audio version of it on YouTube.

          Edit: I’ll save you the trouble. Here’s the link directly. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ogNg20rGTU

        • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          every new technology of this caliber finally gets a more positive use in our lifes

          Yeah, sure, that’s why we’re all riding Segways.

          The reality is that quite a lot of new technologies have no significant real-life use case and vanish without a trace.

          • fierysparrow89@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            29 days ago

            I tried to make clear that I’m talking about tech with potentially significant impact, case in point: blockchain. Are you suggesting that a quirqy twowheeler is somehow on the same level?

            Unless trolling is all you’re about, I can recommend refraining from such offhand dismissive remarks. Sarcasm has its use, but rin an anonymous online discussion it is easy to misunderstand. It does not contribute to a meaningful exchange of ideas.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        There are great uses for crypto, just like there were great uses for Ithica_hours. A place holder for goods and services without physical constraint is a useful idea.

        But it wont work. Because people want to leverage that to make fiat. They don’t care about usefulness, actually earning it, or trading for it.

        They want to get some, hold it, and sell it back for their fiat. Because of that exchanges came into being so they could capture some of the wealth in the process. And from then on it was never going to be useful. Just a way to hope the next sucker would buy what you had.

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          Since the government hates Monero so much, that’s actually not as big of a problem with Monero because people want to earn it and trade it for goods and services in the real world. Also, people who use Monero are incredibly against centralized exchanges and would like to see it banned from every single centralized exchange on Earth so that decentralized exchanges would be the only place you could obtain it or through permissionless atomic swaps and peer to peer. The Monero community also mocks number go up people and calls them state plants.

  • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    29 days ago

    Also worth noting. The Bored Ape Yaht Club NFTs (in the thumbnail) were released by 4chan trolls with Nazi symbolism hidden in some of them. This was the most successful NFT project of them all.

  • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    30 days ago

    I think most people don’t understand cryptocurrencies. On one side it’s all hyperbolic about being your own bank and financial freedom and new tech, on the other side it’s hyperbolic about how there is no underlying value, it’s all going to 0, scams, drugs, terrorism, money laundering,…

    But the fact is that crypto does have an underlying value. It’s gambling. Gambling is a huge industry.

    • leoj@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      30 days ago

      Also drugs.

      I always said as long as crypto can be used to buy drugs, it will have value.

      When everything we know in the world is gone and we’re using rocks to make spears again, people will still want drugs, the value is eternal.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        30 days ago

        I mean it’s also really really good at money laundering and other financial securities scams that are otherwise illegal in real currency. IDK why OP is being so dismissive of that.

        As long as the gov refuses to regulate it, it’s going to be useful for crimes. On the off chance we ever get a government willing to actually do anything but war crimes and graft, regulating it would destroy a lot of its utility and value.

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            Normal money can get you a visit from the SEC when you do securities fraud with it. Has that ever happened with a crypto pump and dump?

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      Congrats, now you understand fiat currency. It only has value because we agree on it.

      • NoiseColor @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        30 days ago

        No. I mean you can get all philosophical and say that everything has value only because that’s a human concept, but thats not really something I would answer to.

        Fiat has value because it’s enforced. Because we have institutions that enforce it and because all of our lives are intertwined with it. We buy food with it and we are paid with it. It’s everywhere. It doesn’t make it immune to manipulation and fraud and crime, but we can take legal action because law is also intertwined with the same system.

        Crypto is , with a couple of exceptions, a really terrible casino.

      • Matty Roses@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        29 days ago

        Fiat has value because the government demands taxes in it. If you don’t pay your taxes, they put you in jail.

    • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      23
      ·
      30 days ago

      As opposed to the USD, which is backed by nothing, and therefore has no underlying value, but is not gambling for some reason?

      • arandomthought@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        30 days ago

        The USD is backed by a state who demands their taxes be paid in their currency, ensuring there will always be demand for said currency.

        • underisk@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          30 days ago

          This is also why people who complain about how “our tax dollars” are spent are missing the point. Their tax dollars don’t fund the government or any of its activities. Taxes are just an inflationary control measure; money is created when the government spends it.

  • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    29 days ago

    Speculating on the value of an investment based on an asset that doesn’t exist is similar to scammers offering to sell certificates of ownership of dogs’ souls.

    Capitalism tends over time to create increasingly abstract forms of ownership. And what could be more abstract than ownership of something that isn’t there at all? They’re selling GUIDs that point to nothing.

    • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      29 days ago

      They can be used to launder money though.

      That’s why art is so inflated. It’s used as a means to launder, because it’s the value is so arbitrary.

  • Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    30 days ago

    This was never anything aside from a scam designed to separate the tech illiterate from their money.