• usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    29 days ago

    They’re ok with their ads harming society, democracy, human rights and civil liberties. But they’re removing ads that might give their victims the means to fight for the harm they caused them.

    • fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      29 days ago

      Remember the time Signal ran an ad campaign on Facebook that told you what info Facebook gave them on you and got banned?

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      29 days ago

      A couple months ago a story came out of a court case that they would happily keep running ads that were identified as scams; they would just increase the advertising costs for the accounts running those ads. The more reports, the higher the price until they reach a limit to ban them. Basically if their users are getting scammed, they want a bigger cut.

  • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    29 days ago

    Meta today began removing ads from attorneys who were seeking clients that claim to have been harmed by social media

    . . . Thereby proving the absolute ease and facility with which content can be rapidly identified and removed when that content removal serves the corporation, and thereby actively helping to prove the plaintiffs’ cases for them.

    Now that’s meta.

    • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      29 days ago

      Like I feel your point, but also the ads definitely have a lot more identifiable information (target audience, keywords, sectors, etc.) they can use for detection & removal vs random posts using algospeak and other evasion tactics

      • seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        29 days ago

        Buddy, it’s a multi-billion company - they could detect anything if they really wanted. But that coutry is ran by rich pedos and it shows.

      • SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        29 days ago

        Honestly, when I still used it I saw a ton of obviously malicious and illegal ads. After reporting them I’d get the message that they followed their guidelines.

        A lot of leaks have shown that they know their products are incredibly harmful, but that changing it would hurt their bottom line.

        Meta is an evil company filled with careless people.

  • dwemthy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    29 days ago

    Kind of related: if you use Gmail and Android check your spam folder! You might have a class action email informing you about the suit against Google. I had one in my spam folder, have seen others saying the same

  • homes@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    29 days ago

    I feel especially sorry for the dumb fucks who stuck around on Meta services long enough to notice the change.

    But, at the same time, I don’t feel sorry for them, because, 15 years ago, I was screaming for them to get off the service, warning them of all the horrible things that were to come, and they ignored me.

    So they got what was coming to them. As a result, the amount of pity I have for them is limited.

    • bampop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      29 days ago

      15 years ago was when I stopped using facebook. It had the potential to be a great way to organize and maintain social connections, but instead it was a toxic environment promoting the most annoying shit, particularly when posted by frequent users trying to broadcast their lives to the world. Simultaneously it did a great job of hiding anything I’d actually be interested to know. Fuck knows how bad it has become in the meantime. It was striking how much it seemed to bring out the worst in people, and equally remarkable how so many people just wanted to wallow in that.

      • homes@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        I hung on all the way to Covid. And holy shit did the world get to be its most toxic when we were all quarantined, locked in our homes, alone with our nasty thoughts, with only the internet as our outlet…

        With only the nastiest and the worst of our internal thoughts to sustain us, that’s when I hopped off the crazy train. When all that anyone had to offer was the most toxic and acidic of thoughts, that’s when I said “no more“. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram… Deleted… thank God I never got on TikTok.

    • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Some of us have no choice. If I don’t have social media, record labels won’t sign my music. I cannot afford to pay someone else to maintain it for me.

  • voidsignal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    29 days ago

    The fact that what this fucker does is still relevant is beyond me. It means there are people still using his dumpster fire of a website. And that’s what’s beyond me. Eventually I will not consider them as victims, but accomplices. No I don’t care about your excuses and I will not take questions.

    • OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      29 days ago

      Corporate malpractice doesn’t seem to register with a certain percentage of the population. Not unless they experience direct harm from it.

      Perhaps because those people would do the same if they were in Zucks position.

      It reminds me of a study I read a long time ago where students from certain fields had different interpretations of what’s construed as lying or cheating. I remember they found that business students have a much lower bar for what’s considered right and wrong.

      STEM students had a much higher bar. These days I find it hard to believe tech would fit among that group anymore.

      • voidsignal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Oh but facebook is all but a tech company. It’s designed and controlled by “business” idiots. All the Silicon Valley is like that. Just a shadow of what it was, back then these STEM people were running the show.

        But it seems these stupid companies start to realize that now it’s Product Manager all the way down, they can’t produce much, beside stupid planning. Why do you think they’re so hell bent in believing their slop machines can replace devs?

      • piranhaconda@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 days ago

        Yea tech got corrupted with the high software salaries. A friend of a friend is a software engineer, really smart guy, really nice and fun to be around from the few times I met him. But I lost a lot of respect for him once he told me he works for Samsung’s ad department. I’m sure he makes a crap load though.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 days ago

      useful right wing propaganda tool for 40-50+ people, thats whats keeping ti alive, and Conservative consume ads more than the left does.