• Steve@communick.news
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    28 days ago

    I had doubts.
    Then the article quotes Cameron saying as much in an interview.
    Yah. Should give her a couple hundred grand.

    • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      OK then.
      Real stupid of him.
      Wouldn’t have seen a resemblance between this beatiful woman and this:

  • wjrii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    This feels like the sort of blurry case that litigation is actually well suited for. It’s clear there was something beyond an inspiration board, yet the end result is also a blue alien. Evaluate the law, establish a value for the design, and make your case. In typical James Cameron fashion, there’s a sense of “I mean well, so I can’t possibly be an insufferable jackass!”

  • notsosure@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    27 days ago

    The same happened to me. In the end I had to show my naked bum in court, but the makers of JD Vance had more funds and hence slicker lawyers.

  • Grimy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    28 days ago

    Hmm, I always figured having brain storm boards for character concepts was always a thing, and that these start with real “stolen” images. It seems like this goes above that but her likeness was just a starting point, it’s not like you can tell it’s her from the final concept.

    I love seeing Disney get sued though.

    • BertramDitore@lemmy.zip
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      28 days ago

      If you found out that your specific facial features as a kid were used in some of the highest grossing films of all time, without your permission, you really wouldn’t be upset and expect some compensation?

      Doesn’t matter if you personally don’t think they look alike.

      • MacAnus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        How important is it to you that it was one of the highest grossing films of all time ?
        How would you feel about it if the movie was a failure?

        • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          27 days ago

          there’s also the issue of her being an indigenous girl/woman and a rich white man taking something valuable from her and using it for his own gains

          plus his personal admission that she’s the face of neytiri is kind of extremely creepy in a “somebody took off their court-mandated gps tracker” way

                • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  27 days ago

                  Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

                  Read more.

                  You’re doing the antisemite thing.