• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    15 hours ago

    That is going to be one very very rough pet passing in 1-2 decades

    • GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      And likely a treasure trove of memories that both celebrate their cat and symbolize their relationship once they deal with the worst of their grief and can enjoy the positive feelings again.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s weird to fixate on the eventual death of an elderly cat when you’ve fully neglected to mourn all the furniture that kitten is going to massacre

  • mnfalconia_a2gc@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    17 hours ago

    A little data point on the whole marriage thing… I and my life partner have been together for 20 y, will be 21 in September. We never got married and we don’t have any rings. I keep hearing that a lot of marriages these days don’t last this long.

    We do informally call each other “my wife”, but still, no formal marriage was ever done.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The only reason marriages lasted longer back in the day was because women were essentially indirectly forced to be with men. The whole bank account thing in the US is a really good example of how screwed women were. There were a lot of very long marriages that were deeply unhappy.

      Nowadays, women get at least some amount of freedom to choose their partners and hundreds/thousands of years of men not having to actually be good people has meant that many of us are lonely and blame the women for having some standards. Good communication and mutual respect go a long way and those are the marriages that last these days.

  • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Why would it matter if you can’t afford jewelry to get married? If this were at a time where the husband is expected to be the sole earner, that could be a problem. But this is 2026. He’s working, she’s working, and getting married will not change that.

    If anything, his and her individual financial burden will decrease by getting married by combining their finances and sharing bills, if they aren’t spending stupid money on diamond rings, big weddings, exotic honeymoons, etc. They’ll share a home, utilities, online subscriptions, etc. That will save them both money. If they can afford to live individually without luxuries, they can more easily afford to live together, maybe with the occasional luxury.

    Stupid take.

    • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My father took my mother with to pick out her ring. She insisted on a smaller diamond. He wanted to buy her a larger rock, could afford it, but my mama was thinking about running a household. As newlyweds, they added a room to the house, bought a brand new washer/dryer set and paid off a car.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    22 years of marriage here. Never bought, given, or worn a diamond in my life.

    Marriage rings are a marketing campaign created to sell you a piece of carbon that is so “rare” they put them on $12 drill bit sets.

    Yep. Yep. Different quality stones. Gotcha. Interested in buying a bridge by chance?

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Carbon is the 4th most abundant element in the galaxy. Silicon is twice as rare, so maybe spend 6 month’s salary on a quartz ring instead? Either that, or save up for a down payment on a house. Nah, who needs a place to live when you can have a hunk of mineral, right?

    • myotheraccount@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      How much for the bridge? I would need a guarantee though that it’s actually used and not just buolilt on flat land in the middle of nowhere! I am no fool after all.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      natural diamonds, are indeed rare, in part because of the marketing campaign driving up demand for an completely useless use of them

      • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        22 hours ago

        They really aren’t, De Beers just had a cartel on the diamond industry and artificially restricted the supply to drive up prices. They have massive deep storage vaults filled with gem quality diamonds just so it can maintain pricing.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Yeah I’m not that far into marriage and I swear someday I’ll get around to getting a nice ring, but I currently wear a silicone one and my wife wears an heirloom ring from her family.

      • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        That was us. Our wedding bands were about that all in, and I got their engagement ring for about $125.

        I think everything we did for our wedding, rings included, was around $1500. The majority of that was booze.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      We didn’t do rings. I worked in a chemistry lab, husband has a skin issue and wearing a ring would probably mean nonstop doctor visits.

      So we just didn’t have rings. It’s really very simple.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just really hate the feeling of wearing rings.

        If I was ever to get married (I won’t), then I wouldn’t have a ring.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      24 hours ago

      I agree, but also, if you can’t afford a cheap ass ring, you probably can’t afford a pet. It doesn’t need to be something fancy. If you care about that tradition (not implying the person in the image does), you can get rings pretty cheap if you don’t need the whole diamond thing, and even cheaper if you’re willing to buy second-hand.

      • darthelmet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Surely a second hand wedding ring must be cursed or something right? Why was it available in the first place? Did they die? Get divorced? Lose their hands and or fingers in some fetish play gone horribly wrong?

        Better to just avoid the whole situation and get a cat.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree with you, but I’d say it’s a 50/50 toss up with women. Half of them would agree with us. The other half are too busy planning a 300k wedding on a 15/hr salary. Those types sometimes care more about the ring than the partner.

      I know a lot of women who would be thrilled to be proposed to with a cat.

      In the past, I’ve also known women who would be sour that they didn’t get a ring. I try not to know that type of person for long.

      • ChexMax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Thinking that 50 percent of women are shallow gold diggers seems a bit high. There are plenty of men who have superficial feelings about how they want their wife to look, but it’s nowhere near 50/50. Usually those gym bros and trophy wives pair up so they’re not really hurting anyone normal with their expectations.

        Personally, I wear a silicone ring. So does my spouse. Our rings for our wedding were a hand me down and a band with a non diamond stone. That said, it’s fair to want a ring. It’s fair to want the tradition, and it’s fair to be comforted by the idea that your partner has been thinking about asking you to merge lives for longer than just today. A ring used to mean more when women weren’t allowed their own bank accounts (actually very recently, in the scheme of things), but it’s still meaningful in a society where we’re taught (incorrectly) that men value non commitment, and don’t want to get “chained” to a “nagging wife.”

        Funnily, it’s guys who make comments like you (that it’s a total toss up whether any woman has an ounce of substance to her or if she’s a total bimbo who only cares about money) that make women afraid that men are not going to fully commit which is why things like a big unnecessary time commitment before the proposal seems romantic and reassuring

      • qaeta@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Honestly, propose to me with a new Akrapovic Slip-On exhaust for my Hornet 750 and a small ceremony near the water in the country with a moto camping trip as the honeymoon and I’d be in biker girl heaven.

        Could get away with the whole shebang for under $10k

        To be fair, that exhaust probably costs as much as most wedding rings anyway lol.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Those types sometimes care more about the ring than the partner.

        I have heard of them, “he hasn’t proposed yet so I left him” kinda thing. That guy was probably happy with things and completely unaware she expected anything to change.

        I do find it odd that when I have looked at posts about it before the vast majority of weddings seem to be super expensive or super cheap. Very little in the middle. Like 3 digits going to a pub for food or 5+ getting fucking everything.

        • Starya67@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          We were sort of in the middle? Wedding dress was a prom dress from Debenham’s (70 quid), Edinburgh registry office, a few friends, 1 brother and the parentals. Afternoon tea at the Balmoral. Not cheap but not 5 figures either.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Ohh that sounds like a nice idea. Much smaller event but something nice.

            Not sure how much of my family would go, they are spread across different corners of the UK. Meanwhile my partner’s family is all packed into an area I can walk across.

  • RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    That he can’t afford it is a stupid assumption imo, this looks like a deliberate choice. Being responsible for raising and taking care of a kitten together is a much bigger commitment than wearing a ring.

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Meh, it’s all fake af probably but the initial post says he was couldn’t afford a ring so if we’re going with it then yeah he is poor in this hypothetical.

      • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I saw that when i was like eight years old and apparently you’re the only other person in the world who saw it because nobody acts like anything on the internet could ever be fake

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah but also there’s the “nothing ever happens” crowd and they’re equally as annoying.

          I think in this case it’s a bit irrelevant anyway, the financial situation is irrelevant but clearly he is proposing in clearly he does have a kitten everything else is immaterial really.

        • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          It was the only cartoon that was on the minute I got back from school. With 4 channels available it was this, Bargain Hunters, some soap opera or the news.

          Arthur was not very funny or particularly interesting, but it sure beat out the alternatives.

          The theme tune has been stuck in my head for 30 years…

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      You severely underestimate the cost of jewelry. And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word “wedding” in front of it.

      • homura1650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        Go to Amazon and search for “Cubic Zirconia ring”. Find one you like and order a pair in the appropriate sizes. If you want something less traditional, drop this cubic zirconia part if the search.

        That can easily get you a pair if wedding rings for less money than I spend every year testing my cats’ poop.

      • OwOarchist@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        And every cost also multiplies by 400% if you put the word “wedding” in front of it.

        In some cases, you can get around that by just not mentioning the whole ‘wedding’ thing.

        And the ring is one of those cases. Just go to the jewelry store, pick one out, and never mention what it’s for. No reason for any price surcharges – a ring is a ring.


        In other cases, though, you really shouldn’t take such shortcuts. That is, if you’re particular about how you want your wedding to go.

        Take the florist for example. For a regular (regular price) order, if you’ve ordered 100 yellow roses for the table settings, but they’re out of yellow roses, they’ll just substitute in 100 white roses instead and call it a day.

        But if you’re particular about ‘your special day’ being perfect and you must have the yellow roses, that’s when the florist needs to know that it’s for a wedding, specifically. And no matter what happens, they’ll do their damnedest to make sure you get the yellow roses you ordered, no substitutions. And that extra mile of effort is what the 400% price surcharge is for.

      • Pickleideas@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I can never tell when someone is just arguing for the thrill of it or if they’re genuine…

        As someone who’s had five dogs and three cats + been married, divorced, and remarried pets cost more just in terms of money. I bought real wedding bands & engagement rings from a proper jeweler for about $1,500 USD per ring. On the other hand I spent between $1500-3000 in vet bills alone for almost every pet I’ve adopted just in the first year; not to mention the toys, food, etc that comes along.

        I suspect you’re gonna say “oh, well some people spend tens of thousands on wedding bands” which is true, but those are also the types of people who spend five-figures on purebred pets and doesn’t apply to the average experiece.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Wow, either your pets have been extremely unlucky, or you live somewhere VERY expensive. Considering those are dollars, I can guess it’s a probably at least a bit of the second.

          My Dutch vet has a “kitten package” which is 550 euros for spay/neuter, first year of (three rounds of?) vaccines and one seperate checkup. I probably spend something like 500 euros on food/grit per cat. Maybe a bit less, it’s cheaper if you have two. That doesn’t include complications of course, or food/toys.

          On the other hand, my wedding ring doesn’t exist because neither of us like rings, so it’s never going to beat that.

  • Upperhand@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    Could you imagine being so shallow that the only thing that’s important is spending a lot of money and not having genuine love…

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s not shallow, marriage is a government sanctioned contract. If you two have genuine love then the government sanctioned marriage doesn’t matter.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        At least in the US the marriage contract gives a massive ton of legal access to shared things, discounts, medical decisions, and a bunch of other stuff. You can kind of come close by spending a bunch of money on legal documentation, but still not exactly the same.