Fascists don’t fear blue voters. You know what they fear? Shattered teeth
Bricks.
They fear bricks.
The thing about this that really makes me ashamed of the democratic establishment is the depiction of the girl on the right vs on the left. This post is literally trying to marginalize progressives. Just look at lemmy, half the progressives here are cishet conputer programmers and Linux nerds in their 40s. This post is trying to enforce a harmful stereotype to make progressives seem like a smaller, less influencial, more radicalized group. It’s already playing into bigotry: the progressive is shown as younger (ageism), with darker skin (racism), more “radical” views, as a drug addict., etc; enforcing the bias that progressives are somehow irresponsible young’uns with unrealistic world-views. Fuck this shit. Never thought I’d see something so obviously bigoted on Lemmy.
I mean, you’re not wrong about most of it. But I don’t code, and am a very irresponsible progressive.
I swear the depictions are put together by the right as a way to show how “druggie, blue haired people” are trying to take over, belittle and make them seem small. Its a horrible and incorrect stereotype.
This mostly comes down to interpretation of the artists intent.
I think that it was the intent to lean into those stereotypes and emphasize that is what conservatives fear the most… these two groups calmly working together rather than opposing each other. Making it more subtle may not get their point across.
That’s what I took away from it too. I don’t see two different political spectrum people, it’s people who have different concerns coming together and going “I care about this, you care about that, we can get to that with time, but we both agree, these assholes are against all of us and they gotta go.”
One says “free Palestine, open borders” the other has a pride flag and a “science is real” button. But they both have “no kings” and “eat the rich” which is where they can align and take solidarity with each other against corporations and billionaires.
It’s what politics are meant to be. We can debate the finer details after we take care of the people, but the well-being of everyone needs to come first no matter what.
Hell we used to have that. Not that long ago the biggest flip flop for politics was abortion vs gay rights and that was kind of it as far as the big stage “swing items” for a lot of people. But as these politicians ignored the needs of the people they’ve spun up more bullshit to keep people distracted while continuing to ignore more of the needs and wants of the people.
We have to come together as an American community to give standard of living to everyone and take our needs back from the fat cats absorbing the countries wealth for yachts and data centers.
That’s what I took away from it too. I don’t see two different political spectrum people
I see a caricature of the left from a centrist who hates them.
If centrists ever stop fighting progressives and not republicans, republicans might have something to fear.
But maybe , just maybe this time let’s not force us to go with establishment democrats, let the people actually decide.
Fascist fear millennial cringe?
Fascists fear class solidarity
Nuremberg trials.
The gallows.
Consequences to their actions.
These are things that centrist democrats have demonstrated that they are wholly uninterested in pursuing.
And they must be replaced whole cloth by insurgent left progressive candidates that grassroots organize, refused big dollar donors and door knock directly with the votors and make personal connections with them so bullshit campaign ads and mailers don’t work.
Local DSA groups are where the organizing can happen.
The funniest thing is how 'muricans look at this and say “yes, we’re a free democracy”
Can’t say I’ve heard anyone say that for a decade or so, actually.
Republicans are usually the only people I see echo this.
What a dank meme my fellow left wing ally!!
Eww reddit content in my lemmy feed
Like giving a free pass to those who through corruption and distance from the people enabled republicans to put a monster at the head of the white house?
Or, now here me out, Dems could run a platform people want to vote for?
No! Fuck you!
That’s the joke. The vote blue no matter who enables fascists, so saying it’s what they fear is funny.
But then how would the billionaire keep their money?
Technically, this could move in the opposite direction.
It just never does, for some reason.
…the reason is that the other side does not “vote red no matter who” which forces the party to run people who represent them
Extremists get their way, because they infiltrate a party of their choice and slowly move it towards their goals. They don’t care if the party they root for is 100% exactly what they want, they just manipulate it and its members long enough until it does. The same could be done by the opposing side, yet somehow they decided to stay at home to “teach the dems a lesson”, while waiting for the shining hero to save them all…
People might hate me for this, but i think it’s not just the maga cult that is affected by the broken educational system and centuries of exceptionalist propaganda. Political parties don’t change by doing nothing.
They don’t care if the party they root for is 100% exactly what they want
You got 100% of everything you wanted as soon as the party made sure we didn’t have a non-genocidal candidate to vote for. It’s frankly disgusting watching the genocide-and-nothing-else wing of the party act like people who don’t like murdering Palestinian children are unreasonable in any way.
The same could be done by the opposing side
It absolutely is being done by the other side. Assuming you’re describing the sides of Mossad, the CIA, the FSB, and the Guoanbu.
That said, I think you’re seriously underselling the impact of strikes, boycotts, and walk outs. A party exists through it’s people, and you can absolutely affect an organization when you form a large enough block that’s willing to simply walk away from a corrupt and failing organization. That’s a very effective way of bringing management to heel.
It absolutely is being done by the other side. Assuming you’re describing the sides of Mossad, the CIA, the FSB, and the Guoanbu.
No. Those guys are too busy influencing the Republicans and other right wing parties in the west. Although, i wouldn’t be surprised if they used similar tactics, like massive bot nets and online propaganda to discourage the rest of the political spectrum from voting for other options.
That said, I think you’re seriously underselling the impact of strikes, boycotts, and walk outs.
That’s part of the democratic process. You can do that, and still vote for the lesser evil. Not because it’s right to vote for them, but to minimize suffering and make sure democracy still functions. Even voting for a different party would be preferable over not voting at all, despite your broken election system. At least that would give a statistical indication what people want from the government.
Instead, you now got a government that is actively trying to undermine the election process, builds internment camps for immigrants, which might be extended to political opponents pretty soon, is actively supporting a bunch of nutjobs to take over half the middle east, strips the government from all its money, threatens its allies with military action, destroys what little social security and education you guys had left, and empowers a new generation of feudalists to take over whatever will be left of the US. If it doesn’t Balkanize before that…
Meanwhile, your leftists are accusing everyone not supportive of their non-voting strategy to be “genociders”, and act surprised as to why they’re losing even more ground in the battle.
Those guys are too busy influencing the Republicans
If you think foreign intelligence services aren’t influencing Democrats, I’ve got a bridge to sell you.
It’s almost like political hierarchies run by the Epstein class and centrists prefer conservatism over progress.
Maybe it never happens because the people who say they would vote for the “true” left don’t vote?
Not until Mamdani is on the ballot. Then they will in a landslide
Any excuse to avoid facing how voting for your shitty wing of the party got us here like you wanted.
Gang, this isn’t complicated. You fight the Democratic establishment 364 days a year. On election day you pick the lesser evil, which hopefully all that fighting you did made much less evil. We have an archaic election system, and until that changes (work to change it), that’s the best path forward.
Gang, this isn’t complicated. You make demands, but declare ahead of time you will not take any action to harm the Dems by not voting for them, and this give up all leverage. Then they continue to lock in GOP policies, that’s tye best path forward.
You fight the Democratic establishment 364 days a year
So many sick burns from people who do not read well.
He explicitly said that by declaring ahead of time that you will vote for whatever candidate they have no reason to change their establishment or respond to your “fighting” it. The only point of leverage that you have over them is not voting for them, which deprives them of the power and wealth that they’re trying to seek by being elected. So, if you surrender that single point of leverage, then what does your fighting consist of?
Buddy, I read your dumb argument. You’re surrendering on the only day that matters and wonder why you never win.
Centrists love to pretend that people who don’t buy their shitty arguments are just too stupid to understand them.
Oh yeah, cause the main point of politics to American liberals isn’t to weild power or alter policy. It’s to demonstrate that they, personally, are better people. And leftists not accepting their VBNMW failed nonsense is an unacceptable contradiction to that self image.
It really is just secular Calvinism.
I’d expect more than Reddit level comprehension from people on Lemmy
The Dems get worse every cycle.
In other words, voting isn’t enough: it’s merely the first step. After “your guys” are in power, you should bully them into keeping their promises and doing more
Remember when the vote blue no matter who people told us they were gonna move Biden left after he was elected?
Good times.
Now they say he’s the most progressive President we ever had. So progressive he lost us abortion.
So progressive he broke a strike. So progressive he bragged about record oil production. So progressive he supported a genocide.
How do you bully people by guaranteeing your support for them unconditionally?
You only do that at the booth, and then you are vocal about the issues that matter to you. From social media to marching in the streets and everything in between
You only do that at the booth, and then you are vocal about the issues that matter to you.
yeah, I do that and I see the results. Constant abuse and accusations of being a trumper from the genocide wing. No change. Like you want.
Ok then what? You yell from the rooftops “I strongly disapprove of what you are doing! I will still vote for you, but I’m not happy about it!”
Politician: “Ok good, you’re still voting for me. Well, back to the fundraising event.”
you should bully them into keeping their promises and doing more
How?
As an non-american, how this is not crystal clear even for the most hardcore communists is an absolute mystery to me.
Because it’s logically stupid and ushered in fascism.
Because the US first past the post system ensures there’s only two parties. So unless you can threaten one, you don’t have input.
They don’t even have FPTP. They have an electoral college. Basically more states have a larger voting power than others.
The US has both. FPTP elections, and the presidency controlled by unequal votes depending on state.
As a non-american, you aren’t close enough to notice that the people who say this are taking advantage of the situation and have been for decades.
Civics education is bad to nonexistent so they do not learn about the spoiler effect, let alone the inevitable math behind first past the post elections. People vote based on how they think the system ought to function instead of how it actually functions.
“If you don’t accept genocide like I want, you don’t understand how anything works!”
You like the system how it is because you get the results you want.
As a non-american, here in my country leftists vote for many different parties, each too small to actually pass the threshold
Fellas please, an election is not the time and place to make your voice heard.
You must have missed this part where you are making your voice heard by picking the least bad option, so here it is again:
On election day you pick the lesser evil, which hopefully all that fighting you did made much less evil.
Or maybe you’re confused about how things ought to be versus how they actually are, that too was covered:
We have an archaic election system, and until that changes (work to change it), that’s the best path forward.
You must have missed this part where you are making your voice heard by picking the least bad option
You like the part where the margin between “least bad” and “most bad” keeps narrowing.
On election day you pick the lesser evil
I cannot stomach voting for someone who sent billions to commit genocide with. That is my voice, and my opinion. What should I do with that on election day, you think?
Good job, the alternative that you and people like you chose by sitting around and doing nothing to prove your superiority is much better! Schoolgirls got bombed! The global markets were disrupted! Elon is a trillionaire! Environmental protections were removed and human lives were valued at 0 by the EPA! Trans people are openly punished and laws are being written to prevent them using public restrooms! Screwworms and measels are returning to the US! The entire planet hates the US (rightfully so and even more than they did before) and historic allies are turning against us! The US openly aligned with Israel and started a war for no reason!
I’m sure glad you couldn’t bear the weight of voting, you’re an inspirational beacon and the world thanks you for what you didn’t do
What are you whining about? You got the genocide you wanted.
You misunderstand. Our current situation is exactly what your proposed strategy got us. You are proposing business as usual politics, and that’s exactly what we’ve been doing for decades. And for decades, things have gotten worse. This is not working. You’d have to be pretty fucking naive to stick to the same strategy that got us to where we are today (full blown fascism).
Wow, it’s almost impressive how you are so insanely dedicated to missing the entire point. You obviously are not capable of understanding a damn thing
My guy, your point is not a subtle or nuanced as you think. It’s literally the default opinion in a liberal democracy. That’s not an indictment of the point, but it does mean I’ve heard it a thousand times before, and it’s not hard to understand. Independently of that it is empirically wrong though.
Grow up and do the best thing that the situation allows. To see what the alternative is… [gestures vaguely at the world]
So, this is not the alternative though, right? Our current situation and political landscape is exactly where decades of blue no matter who got us. It’s time to change strategies, because this isn’t working.
Or is it where decades of mostly ignoring anything but presidential elections has gotten us? Where mot participating in most of the process has gotten us and then we want there to be just the choice we want, waiting for us at the end?
Again, you seem to be willingly missing the point. Up until the election, you had an entire year to fight tooth and nail for better. At the election, you only have two choices and no amount of “they both suck I refuse to do anything but sit here and tell everyone else they fucked up by letting it get to this point” will change that. You had two choices only and refused to make a single one, letting the worst happen.
Are you aware of the world around you enough to know how it got here? They voted red every single time and pulled things slightly more to the right every time they could. They didn’t like their candidates, but they understood they won’t get where they want to immediately. You have to incrementally get there because people are awful and scared of change so they kept working at it election by election. Meanwhile, people like you said “well this is not the perfect choice so I’m going to sit around and pout about it” and do nothing to even slow their progress.
Again, you seem to be willingly missing the point. Up until the election, you had an entire year to fight tooth and nail for better.
You won the instant we were cheated out of a primary and both candidates were pro-genocide like you.
No I understand your point. I just strongly disagree with it, mainly because reality just doesn’t line up with what you’re saying. What signs do you have that your current strategy is working? Like, actually. What signs are you getting from reality make you think “well geeze, we’ve got this down pat.”
“Grow up” fuck off with that. Telling other adults they aren’t adult because they don’t agree with your opinion? Fuck right the fuck off.
Get the fuck over yourself. It’s not “because they disagreed with your opinion” it’s because there was a choice to make between openly bombing children and giving ICE more funding than the military or keeping the status quo, which is an embarassing choice for sure and it’s goddamn disgusting those were the only options, but keeping the status quo would have been easier to come back from than coming back from whatever the fuck is happening now. Grow the fuck up and learn to make adult decisions
We tried to tell you that you would lose if you didn’t change. You screamed abuse.
“Grow up and use your vote to do what’s best for me”
Fixed it for you, clown
Worry less about election day and more about those 364 days.
No, I think I will worry about election day, thank you very much. Voting is one of the most important ways to steer politicians toward working for your benefit. So please tell me, in your world view, what should I do with my voice and opinion on election day?
Bonus question: if you guarantee your vote to a party, regardless of what they do (such as commit a genocide, such as expand ICE, such as building the border wall, such as keeping Guantanamo bay open, such as never taxing the rich more, and so on), what incentive do they have to listen to you? And follow up, if your answer is that democrats do still work for the electorate, why are they moving further and further right, away from the interests and opinions of most Americans? (This is measurable, see for examples the 2014 paper Testing theories of American politics which found that policy positions of politicians align perfectly with those of economic elites, and with those of average voters really only ever by accident)
Start with learning the difference between the way things ought to be (they really should- it would be so easy) and the way things actually are. Knowing is half the battle!
Oh great thanks for the advice! Any chance you have an answer to literally any of the questions I asked?
Get called a trumper 364 days a year by people who love how much like trump the democratic establishment is constantly trying to become.
Fun story, my second-to-last straw with Reddit was being banned from r/democrats for saying Biden should not seek a second term (too old) and they need to hold a primary. I said this repeatedly starting about a year before the election and was called all manner of terrible things while accumulating loads of up and downvotes. When the time for a primary passed I pivoted my message to: Biden should retire (play up a medical issue) so we have the first female president and she has the incumbent bump for the election. I was banned with the message “Shut up, Biden is going to get a second term. Deal with it [inappropriate language].” twelve days before Biden dropped out.
Are they still refusing to admit Mamdani exists?
No, now they claim somehow that’s proof their VBNMW nonsense works.
Despite Mandami showing it only goes one way
The best path forward is labor organization leading to a general strike, your vote is as worthless as your opinion
your vote is as worthless as your opinion
I love your idea of a labour union while openly telling someone’s voice is useless.
My idea of a labor union doesn’t involve a rigged voting system, fucking duh
Work to change it, how?
By illegally taking away capital from the people illegally fighting back against that change?
You’re not in a democracy, stop solving your problems democratically
By backing AOC and other progressives.
Lol fuck off
How is the United States not a democracy?
Your vote doesn’t fucking matter, that’s how
Is that why Trump won?
Trump actually won a primary, unlike Kamala.
Which goes on to show that votes actually matter. If it didn’t, we might have Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley or Vivek Ramaswamy as president.
Lol cope
Trump won because the billionaires who own this country saw an unprecedented opportunity, and in no small part because of the “pied piper” strategy that Hillary and the corporate dems thought would ensure an easy win
Trump won in 2024 because he was the candidate who got the highest number of votes. Votes that mattered btw.
Harris won the primaries because votes don’t matter.
Lol electoral votes maybe, unless you’re a member of the electoral college your vote did fuck all
(1)In a democracy the people elect a representative of their ideology to govern them in fair elections
(2)Both parties in the US in the 21st century start wars on foreign countries, lie about policies, submit to corrupt lobbying
(3)Both parties in the US are not representative of the people of the US
(4)The US is not a democracy
Which of these is wrong?
(4) because both parties are elected to power by voters
When the “good” party eschews primaries because they cannot abide giving the people an opportunity to vote against genocide, that’s only democracy to people who like genocide.
You do realise that there are more than two parties right?
Suggest voting for a third and watch what happens.
4 is deduced from 1,2,3 the deduction is just using definition and the fact both parties lead to the same outcome to come to a contradiction
Both parties have been elected (1), both led to (2), both aren’t representative (3), You can’t blame voters if they have no power over the outcome, there’s no democracy in US
If the point you’re trying to make is that outcome is irrelevant and only voting itself is what constitutes a democracy then this needs to be applied to other countries as well, North Korea is a democracy
Both parties definitely don’t lead to the same outcome. One party supports cutting welfare for the poor and the other party doesn’t.
The voters absolutely have power over the outcome. They voluntarily chose Trump over Harris in 2024.
North Korea is a one party “democracy”. In the United States, you have multiple parties, more than the two that most people voluntarily vote for.
Both parties definitely don’t lead to the same outcome. One party supports cutting welfare for the poor and the other party doesn’t.
This statement is inherently contradictory. So one party is for cutting welfare. If they win, welfare gets cut. If the other pary wins, welfare stays the same, or gets cut only a little (good ol across the aisle compromise). Next cycle the other party wins, welfare gets cut. Same outcome.
Now, if the other party was for increased welfare, or for stopping fracking, or for naturalizing more undocumented immigrants, or for reducing military spending, then you’d have a point. But in selling the democratic party as the alternative to vote for, you can’t even bring yourself to say they stand for something positive. Best we get is that they’re not actively harmful on purpose.
It’s a gradient. Did you get to decide who you’re allowed to vote for? Do they represent your actual interests? Do you have a say over what happens in your city or your workplace?
Stuff like that
Congress very much decides what happens in cities and workplaces afaik
The electoral college.
Well, most electors are honest about which President they vote for
It’s so obvious the person who made this is on the left side of this picture.
Only a lib could give the girl on the right both an anarchy patch and a bernie 2020 hat.
Meh I loved Bernie.
It’s so obvious the person who made this is on the left side of this picture.
Anyone who says “blue no matter who” is on the left side of this picture. And on the right politically.
I’ve started saying “Vote blue no matter who” to dems that think progressives can’t win.
Yes, I can’t believe this idea has never hit me before. It’s fucking beautiful. AOC for the win, vote blue no matter who, right?
I’m a socialist and I support the Democratic party
I’m a starving, homeless, gay, trans woman, and I support the republican party.
Why? They hate you.
Not as much as Republicans would hate me
They certainly hide it better.
I don’t think Democrats support cuts to welfare spending.
The centrist wing’s current hegemony over the party was built on the legacy of Bill Clinton, who cut welfare spending.
Which President “ended welfare as we know it”?
No you’re not
You would know
I do know
Sure you do
Yeah I’m sure
I care about my constituents, even though they’re filthy unhoused vape addicted lazy Bernie bros. Fist bump!
I believe in the liberatory power of what would probably be termed anarcho-syndicalism and I would have voted for Bernie. I own a sweater with his name on it.
Unless the candidate is a progressive, then the establishment Dems won’t endorse them (unless the progressive wins, then suddenly they totally supported the progressive all along)
(no, I’m not saying don’t vote, just frustrated by the fucking hypocrisy)
Don’t just vote Democrat, vote in the primaries.
Ya that’s a problem I have in my neck of the words. Everyone complains about who is on the General Election ticket and they just shrug their shoulders about voting in the Primary.
“You mean I have to vote, and then vote again? Ugh, I wasnt even planning to show up to the actual vote. Meh…it’ll all work out fine.”
If voting day was a holiday it would less of a problem
or just have longer and more convenient early voting? In Norway you can vote for at least a month at local public institutions
If voting day was a holiday, only people who get federal holidays off would get the day off. But it would be a great excuse to get rid of early voting.
Easy fix (that almost every other country uses): vote on Sunday.
Good thing no one has to work on Sundays. Easter Sunday is a federal holiday and there’s plenty of people who still have to work.
If voting day becomes a federal holiday, states that don’t like the idea of poor people voting will do away with early voting.
Or it won’t and I’ll complain online which is even better than voting, right?
Yup, drag the fuckin party left.
Are we acting again like the DNC cares about people voting in primaries?
Exactly. This times a million. We don’t vote in primaries and then get all surprised that the Democratic candidates resemble the folks who voted in the primaries.
Imo if you don’t vote in the primaries, you’ve forfeited your right to bitch about the candidates on the general ticket
vote in the primaries.
When the party runs primaries at all, they interfere with them every chance they get. Saying “jUsT vOtE iN tHe PrImArIeS” without acknowledging this paints the results of the party’s corruption as the will of the people.
That would be a nice idea, but what do you do when incumbents run unopposed in the primary
Run against them.
(In theory. I wouldn’t do that either.)
I figured that bit was obvious, I was speaking more towards the Dem leadership’s hypocrisy. Again, absolutely not saying “don’t vote both sides reeeeee”
I was complementing, not contradicting 🙂. I agree.
*cough*
Mamdani
*cough*
Platner
*coughcough*
deleted by creator
those were two of the big ones I had in mind, yeah
deleted by creator
Yeah didn’t the Democratic Party take credit for some shit Mamdani got done? Seemed pretty shitty since they tried to stop him from getting elected.
Yeah didn’t the Democratic Party take credit for some shit Mamdani got done?
They sure tried.
Make sure you’re pressuring the establishment Democrats in your jurisdiction and the people making campaign contributions.
No its, vote blue no matter who* only applicable if the said blue candidate is not progressive
and the whole fucking time we are voting in primaries, it’s all “progressive candidates can’t win the election” and astroturfed lies and slander using democratic funds to hurt itself in its own confusion. want my vote? field candidates that i would vote for.
and no kings is performative at best
want my vote? field candidates that i would vote for.
I hope you still go to the polls and write-in if you don’t like either candidate.
I do. I want it on record that I won’t vote for right wing Democrats.
Funniest part is when Del libs tell me that the left won’t vote for a woman - because I voted for De La Cruz.
i voted harris for president, but at this point i am so disgusted with how the democrats are acting that i will vote third party if needed.
