• nickiam2@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    One is a truck made for actual work and the other is an abomination pretending to be a truck.

    • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      The second is basically a minivan, but the 3rd row is a truck bed.

      My truck is kinda similar, but they just took a smaller suv and added a bed.

      • nickiam2@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        So why not just use the van? At least the cargo space is covered from the elements. Most people who drove these yank tanks don’t actually need the truck part.

  • gregorum@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    willing to bet the driver of the tiny truck has a bigger… ahem

    • seathru@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Death wish? I love kei trucks but I fear getting into a mash up in one of them.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        In this case it’s not about body shaming but about shaming a means of compensation. Also it’s not really a literal take. “Big dick energy” has nothing do with actual dick size. And being a “Karen” has nothing to with a persons actual name or gender.

        • Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not sure if you’re serious but i will answer as if you were.

          A common attack against people with large trucks is that they have a large truck to compensate having a small penis. This implies having a small penis is bad/unacceptable. This is obvious body shaming but also contributes to toxic masculinity.
          Both of these are unacceptable.

          There are many alternative ways to talk shit without playing into these kinds of comments and TBH, the compensation comments have been used so much and are so obviously baseless that they don’t hit very hard, IMO.

          • gregorum@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            well, i didn’t actually say that, and i’m not responsible for others filling in the blanks with their own negative thoughts. as you can see, several others actually managed to conclude something different.

            don’t blame the Rorschach test because you see something you don’t like.

            • Mac@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Blocked. User has nothing useful to contribute and will argue in bad faith when called out.

  • moshtradamus666@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Trucks are getting so stupid. The brands are smart though, they really know how to to make the most of men insecurities.

    • SevFTW@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I can only recommend Our Changing Climates take on this: “Are Men Killing the Planet?”

      The title is inflammatory, yes, but it’s a great video that drives home the point of masculine insecurity and a “dominance of nature” spurs a lot of the “masculine” stereotype behind trucks and SUVs.

      Nebula Link

      YouTube

      Piped (see the bot)

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    No clue why people buy kei cars from Japan when they can pick up the left hand drive version of the kei cars from Taiwan.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    But only one can crush a toddler without you even feeling it.

    Buy the new Ford Infanticide 5000. You’re American. You deserve it.

        • pingveno@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’m a tall male (6’3") and even I worry about being seen over the hood of those monstrosities.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            After many years of driving different cars/trucks/other I want to know why at some point in the year 2000 decided that vision out of a moving vehicle was secondary to swoopy body lines. Get in something from the 60’s and you can see amazing (even in a boat of a car) yet by 2006 you can not see shit. for example:

            Chad 1966 Chrysler 300:

            2020 Chrysler 300:

            • meowbotage@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Safety priority for those inside the vehicle. Significant improvement in side impact protection came around in the 2000’s. At the cost of thicker pillars, taller thicker doors, heavier cars.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Have you ever towed anything? Towing a trailer of that size and weight with a car like that, even if legal, is sketchy as fuck. Especially on hills or mountains. Where I am from its legal to take that picture, it’s not legal to get on the road. For good reason. A capable truck is much safer for that purpose, for everyone.

        • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ahahaha, tell me you’ve never left your country, probably not even your fucking state.

          Yeah, all of Europe doesn’t know how to tow, and is „sketchy as fuck“. 🤡

          This is perfectly legal and safe.

          You know what’s sketchy as fuck? The US, which has 3 times more road deaths per capita than the EU.

          Now go back to your wankpanzer, please.

  • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Towing capacity, payload weight, carrying 3 more people, bed width, drivetrain? I think many trucks are way too big, and it’s silly to own a big work truck if you just use it to go to the grocery store but it’s really about so much more than bed size.

    • uis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      carrying 3 more people

      As a payload.

      I’m not sure if you can fill it to load capacity even with lead bricks.

      Or if you want to carry people, you can use this: . For carrying not people you can remove seats. It’s even roughly same size.

      • mutch@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        In addition to the payload. Payload goes in the back! Fill it with stones then put five men in it to shovel the stones. You’d need two vans for the same purpose. And if it’s roughly the same size, what’s the problem? Vans like that can be nice too, we see lots of Ford transits here in the states for tradesmen. Similar use case to what you’re describing.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Is it true that the truck bed on those yank tanks are basically unusable due to height or shape or something, and are purely cosmetic?

    • DickFiasco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Even a short bed is incredibly useful in my experience, however I rarely ever see this type of vehicle used for anything remotely utilitarian.

    • tetris11@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      the larger one does do more:

      • Pick up 3 extra people
      • Can roll down the back window to let long planks of wood through

      These are the only extra advantages I can see, and they are seldom use cases at best.

      Fine, if you’re a contractor driving your workers to/from work whilst carrying all the equipment, on a daily basis, such a truck is very useful.

      But how many people who drive these do that?

      • Tak@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Nobody does work out of that truck, it has a bed cover and the wheels don’t look like they have any mud or dirt caked in the tread/wheels. It’s a little pavement princess that probably carries one person 75% of the time.