• yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The fedora tipping is too funny, seeing it from outside the situation, but she certainly was very scared because it’s such a bizarre event.

  • TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I can see criminals easily exploiting this default behavior to stop the car and steal from those inside.

    Where’s a Johnny cab when you need it, it knows how to deal with criminals.

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I doubt choosing to stick up a vehicle covered in cameras with someone who likely isn’t even carrying cash is anyone’s idea of a good payoff.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            In civilized countries “self defense” means you might have to punch someone. “You should have an easy way to kill someone on you at all times, and keep it hidden so they don’t know” is not self defense, but clear signs of a dystopia.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          That was in response to being robbed.

          I think the phrase you’re looking for is “defending yourself”.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I don’t live in a 3rd world country, so I guess I just don’t understand the concept of needing to arm myself before leaving my house because I’m likely to need a deadly weapon while I go about my business.

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              52 minutes ago

              What country do you live in? I’m curious which one has no theft or violent crime.

      • TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I prefer to reduce demand, instead. Everyday people who feel happy and safe don’t feel the need to be violent.

  • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Okay, this really seems more like a case of sexual harassment, rather than harassment of Waymo customers, which was my first suspicion. Had it been the latter as part of a politically motivated action against the company I might have had a lot more sympathy, but this is disgusting…

    • The Liver@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You saw the fedora and thought it was anything but sexual harassment? LMAO

      • Fiona@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        I saw “driverless waymo” in the title.

        Also: Prejudice against people wearing fedoras is still prejudice and thus not really a great thing to have. One of my best friends also likes to wear a hat at times (not sure if it counts as a fedora, I know very little about heads) and is one of the sweetest people I know.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The victim’s statement here ends with an oddly volunteered tangent and specific praise of driverless vehicles, before it finally takes an eerie turn in the last sentence…

    "…With that said, I think the Human Factor in this issue is going to be a lot harder to solve than anything else.” …FREEZE CITIZEN!

    I do hope she’s okay, and those two folks seem to be clowns, but this thing also all reads as likely guerilla marketing for Waymo - who the article informs me, in a very capitalism-friendly turn of events, that they now have their service open to the public in 3 cities, cars have a safety feature that checked in with her multiple times and they “rewarded” her with an extra ride. It’s a light enough “crime”, with a very engineered feeling and enough to feel “real” while providing ready fodder for morning radio talk shows, Jimmy Fallon and good morning America talking heads to drone on about this morning across America as time filler that quietly advertises waymo “saving” a person from the scary outside world.

    Note: Also, was very funny that throughout drafting my comment here “waymo” was constantly being autocorrected to “say no” :)

  • Destide@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Give it a couple of years they’ll legalise running down pedestrians for self drive cars. Can’t have these jackalopes affecting the bottom line

  • Tanka@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    That’s gotta be the cyberpunkiest thing I’ve read in a while.

  • FuzzyRedPanda@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This made me wonder though…the car obviously has cameras on the outside, and there’s also a way to communicate with the support team from inside…so is it a stretch to think that these cars could be auto-recording everything that’s happening inside the car?

    Should we - as riders - have any expectation of privacy in a car with no driver?

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 hours ago

      No, but then the same is true of taxis and Ubers. They all have some kind of recording equipment in them for ensuring safety and cover in case someone claims something.

  • CondensedPossum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Some guys were annoying/sexist to her while she participated in a public menace and I guess this is supposed to mean something to me beyond “stay away from California”

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They should have little nozzles to disperse a cloud of pepper spray around the vehicle in emergencies.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      SAAB tried to corner the US market in the '80s and '90s by giving away a shoulder mounted anti tank rocket with each purchase of a car, but their legal team said “that’s not an appropriate way to deal with road rage.”

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Maybe that could spark a nice tradition of the one sitting besides the drivers seat calling ‘shotgun’.

      … O wait

  • DeadNinja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    In an instance like this, our riders have 24/7 access to Rider Support agents who will help them navigate the situation in real time

    Clearly that’s what a human driver would do, but I guess those Rider Support Agents work for free, so why not fire the driver? /s

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      And then when you have an emergency the response is along the lines of:

      “Thank you for requesting to speak with a rider support agent. All agents are currently busy assisting other Waymo customers, but the next available agent will assist you as soon as possible. There are currently 32 other customers in front of you. Thank you for your patience.”

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        True. The instant response that exists now is only because this is a pilot program and they want to prove that it works. Once it’s normalized they will lay off most of the rider support and fuck you if you have to wait on the line.

  • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 hours ago

    I have to admit, I expected a lot worse from the style of writing. This was written like some true crime stuff lol

  • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    I’d expect the Waymo video to have captured footage of these guys. It might not be that difficult to track them, and street harassment might well qualify as assault if the DA of San Francisco were interested in prosecuting.

    That said, it’s telling that they freely and openly harassed a strange woman on the street once the threat of being run over was not a factor.

    ETA: One short-term workaround is to tint the windows so that passengers cannot be seen from the outside, but there might be causes to harass occupied Waymo vehicles regardless of the passenger (say, to mug them). I’m curious if this is going to lead to equipping autonomous vehicles with anti-riot ordnance.