• magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    262
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    If Russia withdrew their troops, there would be peace immediately.

    If Ukraine withdrew their troops, Ukraine would be no more - and there’s no indication Russia would stop there.

      • RippleEffect@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve been noticing this a lot. There’s a lot more Russian support in all my apps. I really think there’s a concerted effort that is now being fully enabled by our current administration.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          The US officially de-prioritized countering Russian cyber threats a few days ago. It makes sense they would become more emboldened

      • Dzso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t doubt this, but I haven’t personally noticed it before. Can you share more insight about what you noticed, so I can be on the lookout?

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      47
      ·
      7 months ago

      There wasn’t peace before Russia invaded. The far-right US puppet regime was slaughtering ethnic Russians in the east, and allowing NATO to move in troop and missile deployments to the Russian border.

      Why would Ukraine behave differently after a Russian withdrawal, when they were escalating for 8 years prior to the invasion?

      • Loce@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Arent your eyes watering? How can you even type? With putins cock jammed so far your throat? No gag reflex?

        • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          25
          ·
          7 months ago

          What is it about NATO & Israeli bots that causes y’all to so reflexively gravitate towards sexual violence? Is it part of the official training, or are y’all just like that?

          • Loce@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            You’re either a bot, a troll or just plain old stupid. Even if you’re just stupid, you’re not worth my time because I cant fix stupid, and there’s really no point in arguing with you.

            • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Na just a MAGA trumpist. They are like that, their brains have permanently atrophied and they cannot understand information any more, they just keep parrotting their bullshit endlessly like a broken record.

      • Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        I dunno, there are a tonne of incredibly stupid and uncreative people who conservatives believe every day for years. The part about loki seems to be a statisical outlier not just “best case scenario”, ya know?

      • caboose2006@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        Give Ukraine everything they need to kick the Russians off their soil. Tomahawks, F35s, a million artillery shells a week, etc… lift all usage restrictions with the exception of civilian targets and infrastructure. Once every square inch of Ukraine is back in Ukrainian hands full NATO membership and a Marshall like recovery plan.

        Or assassinate Putin. As long as Putin lives Ukraine is under threat.

        • computerscientistII@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          and infrastructure.

          No. That has to go. The war will end a lot sooner, if there aren’t any bridges and rails left, the Russkies can use to ship ammo and cannon fodder.

          • caboose2006@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I meant civilian infrastructure. So like power stations or shipping centers that handle civilian goods or subways etc… If it carries a single artillery round it’s fair game.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              7 months ago

              How did we reach a point where the most hawkish warmongering psychos think they’re left-leaning?

              • caboose2006@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Fighting fascists is a long standing tradition of the left. Pick up a history book idiot.

        • thetemerian@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          29
          ·
          7 months ago

          That’s unsustainable, brainless and unrealistic, who is going to pay and fight if the war continues for 5 more years, what about 10 more years?

          • caboose2006@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Russia is importing North Koreans to fight. You think if Ukraine gets unlimited weapons the war will last 5 more years? What day of the 3 day invasion are we on now?

            The only reason the war has lasted this long is because of the drip feeding of weapons. which was probably a ploy to extend the war and make defense contractors more rich. So yeah, end it quickly by giving Ukraine what it needs to win.

            So, what’s your "totally realistic"TM solution?

            • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Theory that more weapons wins is based on Russia being overextended and not outproducing west by itself. Your point on “endless war being perfect US policy” is the right one. Wining a war is always terrible. It means an end to war, and just look at how sad everyone around here is about that prospect. That Ukraine could suffer far more destruction, as retaliation for the special weapons it uses for terrorism inside Russia, is far more likely, as is striking western nations as punishment for “breaking the script of a slow war of attrition with eventual Russian victory”.

              ATCMS got Ukraine electricity sector destroyed, instead of winning. US can produce 60 per year.

            • thetemerian@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              19
              ·
              7 months ago

              And if you’re wrong and the war can indeed go on for 10 more years are you prepared to deal with the consequences of the destruction of Ukraine, potentially nuclear war and destabilization of Europe?

              • caboose2006@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                7 months ago

                So you don’t actually want to talk solutions. I asked what is your solution? I will answer no more questions until you answer mine.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Russia does not have the capacity to fight 5 or 10 more years (unless the US backstops them). Ukraine does not need the resources to go 10 years. They need the resources to outlast the Russians. That is probably more like 18 to 24 months. It could be less.

            In my view, that is not only affordable but quite inexpensive given the benefits.

            Europe and the US have contributed about $250 billion collectively over the last 3 years (Europe has contributed more). That is a small amount of money for either of them. Most of the $120 billion the US counts as Ukraine aid has been spent on new weapons systems for the United States for the US military. The US builds themselves new weapons, sends Ukraine old ones, and counts the value of the old weapons as Ukraine aid. The thing is, most of these weapons would have been decommissioned in a few years without being used (assuming the US does not enter any major wars). So, the “real” cost to the US is actually far less.

            Both the US and Europe not only can sustain their current commitment. They could easily increase it without breaking a sweat. I lay no claim to it but Norway alone has a $1.7 trillion dollar pile of cash.

            In my view, the real question is who is going to pay for the aftermath of Russia’s continued aggression if they are allowed to invade Ukraine?

            Was it cheaper to have World War II or to stop Germany in Poland or Czechoslovakia? What would we have done in 1945 if given the chance to do it again?

            Perhaps you are right that it is unrealistic. That is more an opinion than a demonstrable fact and my opinion is no better than yours.

            I am not sure I can agree that it is brainless. While that is also an opinion, there are lots to facts to counter that argument.

            Supporting Ukraine no matter what it takes seems like the clear and obvious choice. I guess that is why it is what every country that matters is doing (except the US—now).

            Do you have a better argument?

            • thetemerian@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              28
              ·
              7 months ago

              Looks like we’ll meet again here in a few years, after thousands more will die and more territory will be lost to argue again about how this war can hypothetically end, just because Zelensky’s ego was too big.

          • threeganzi@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Your point hasn’t been proven. OPs point was that Putin promises can’t be trusted. And without US putting force behind that promise, Ukraine is wise to be worried about such a deal.

            Just because one alternative realized doesn’t mean there weren’t other options, better or worse.

            Edit: plus, a peace deal is far from done, regardless which side you root for.

        • thetemerian@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          7 months ago

          I see plenty of alternatives, just not one in which people stop dying immediately.

          • LeFantome@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            History teaches us that Russia cease fire agreements mean that fewer die immediately but that lasts a far shorter time than you hope for. In the end, even more people die than before when Russia resumes their aggression.

            This is not a prediction or an opinion. That are literally dozens of historical events to draw this information from.

            • thetemerian@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              7 months ago

              According to what you’re saying, the only solution is NATO troops fighting in Ukraine because we cannot trust Russia in any way, shape or form.

              When are you willing to enroll to go to the front?

              • caboose2006@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                You have textbook RT talking points. It’s so fucking obvious you’re a russian asset at the very keast

                • thetemerian@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Yeah bro, everyone who doesn’t have your specific world view is a russian asset. What, are you 12?

  • Gloria@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 months ago

    War in Donbas

    Ukraine, Russia, the DPR and LPR signed a ceasefire agreement, the Minsk Protocol, in September 2014.[40] Ceasefire breaches became rife, 29 in all,[41] and heavy fighting resumed in January 2015, during which the separatists captured Donetsk Airport. A new ceasefire, Minsk II, was agreed on 12 February 2015. Immediately after, separatists renewed their offensive on Debaltseve and forced Ukraine’s military to withdraw.[42] Skirmishes continued but the front line did not change. Both sides fortified their position by building networks of trenches, bunkers and tunnels, resulting in static trench warfare.[43][44] Stalemate led to the war being called a “frozen conflict”,[45] but Donbas remained a war zone, with dozens killed monthly.[46] In 2017, on average a Ukrainian soldier died every three days,[47] with an estimated 40,000 separatist and 6,000 Russian troops in the region.[48][49] By the end of 2017, OSCE observers had counted around 30,000 people in military gear crossing from Russia at the two border checkpoints it was allowed to monitor,[50] and documented military convoys crossing from Russia covertly.[51] All sides agreed to a roadmap for ending the war in October 2019,[52] but it remained unresolved.[53][54] During 2021, Ukrainian fatalities rose sharply and Russian forces massed around Ukraine’s borders.[55] Russia recognised the DPR and LPR as independent states on 21 February 2022 and deployed troops to those territories. On 24 February, Russia began a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, subsuming the war in Donbas into it.

    Make no Mistake: Russia is trying to destroy Ukraine since 2014. Russia is the agressor and needs to put in its place.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Russia is trying to destroy Ukraine ever since both of them were founded as independent counties. This is just a reiteration of what we’ve already seen in the russian empire and in the USSR. History is a merry-go-round and I’m getting motion sick of all the rotation.

      Edit: typo

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        Goes back to the Russian Revolution at the very least, though probably to the the Russian Empire. Historical data send to suggest that the Russian elite will not accept anyone but Russian hegemony over the region. The Bolsheviks betrayed the Ukrainian Anarcho-Communists who had helped to defeat the White army because they wanted independent self-governance rather than bowing to the Bolsheviks’ authoritarian Central Council in Moscow.

  • Valmond@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lots of propaganda today, seems like someone doesn’t like Zelenskyy or a strong Ukraine.

    Slava Ukraine!

  • chaitae3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    You can absolutely want peace and even agree to concessions to Russia to reach a sustainable peace, but this point is absolutely valid: there must be security guarantees, otherwise Putin will just use the armistice to rebuild its strength and attack again.

    • rockerface 🇺🇦@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh, absolutely. We want peace more than anyone else, but giving putin a chance to regroup, pull more support together and attack again is not peace, it’s surrender

    • teamevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Like all the guarantees before it, trusting the scorpion will only get the frog drowned.

      As a disgusted American… SLAVA UKRAINE!

      I’m sorry my country is acting so poorly

    • surph_ninja@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      There are already were security guarantees, and then the US and their puppet in Ukraine violated their agreements.

    • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      The image describes 2014-2022. So it seems he’s had 5 additional sit-downs with Russia between 2023-2025.

      At least someone is trying to make peace happen (Ukraine).

  • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    The deal should be… All Russian troops get pulled out of Ukraine. Ukraine gets a lump sum of all seized Russian assets in foreign nations, Russia agrees not to move troops within 100 miles of Ukraine’s border without Ukraine’s consent. Ukraine agrees to allow and even assist civillain Russian services with locating and returning living and deceased Russians.

    The alternative is we take the limits off of what targets can be attacked within Russia, and enable Ukraine to enforce the conditions as proposed.

    I’d also like to add that Russia and the US give up their UN “super veto” power. I don’t think anything good and effective can come from the UN when a single country can just “nope” any UN proposals.

    • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Veto power in the UN is a short for “we will use nukes if you do this”. The UN is not world government, it’s the organisation which task(among many less important things) is to prevent nuclear war.

        • LeFantome@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          As good as this comment is, neither has the range or targeting capability that the US does or that the USSR did.

          The security council veto was designed to keep the US and the USSR at the negotiating table and off the battlefield.

          • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Then why are all those other nations on the security council? Just seems like we only need the members with veto power at this point.

  • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    the amount of Fascist, Jingoistic shitposting that favors either Republican or Russian propaganda on social media is STAGGERING. The people arguing for it are more concerned about bathroom gender signs, DEI, wokism, and a bunch of other made up stuff, and not only are they oblivious that their country is being taken over by a foreign aggressor, THEY ARE PROUD OF IT. Because “at least the Russians kill the gays”

    We are in this position we are today, because Russia has been waging an information war against NATO countries for 15-20 years. and the seeds they planted during the days of Georgia and Crimea, are blooming into fruit now.

    The free world is AT WAR with Russia, and for the time being, America has been conquered. Victory from the jaws of Defeat, for the Russian mafia

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        They dont need to invade to conquer. They already control the president. he just ended aid to Ukraine. He literally will not say anything bad about Russia. he is bought, paid for, and owned.

        America is currentley, and indefinetely, an enemy of the free world.

      • uienia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Putin has succeeded in stopping US aid to Ukraine, splintering NATO and isolating US from all its previous allies. That is very much Russian victory over the US.

        • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          do you remember what they said? By the time I looked at the reply, the account was banned

          edit - I dont think I need to know, was able to trace some of their comments on another instance, dude is shreiking about free speech. one of those people who wants to spit vicious hateful bile but be protected from consequences.

          people like that are lucky they have keyboards, they generally get punched / stabbed / shot for that kind of behaivor in the real world.

          • Valmond@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            They, “justexit” spewed this crap:

            So we must just support your piece of shit Ukraine because you feel its the right thing to do? fucking delusion using every single buzzword, that just shows how fucking insane you are dumb clown doesnt even know the definition of a fascist, clown world

            Seems like they are losing (russia losing) after all.

            Slava Ukraine!

            • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              they screeched and slurred their way into a ban from the platform, like I said, people like that talk tough behind a keyboard, because they’d face consequences in real life for saying that. ranging from a punch in the face to a slug in the brainpan.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think you’ve called people “clown” at least five separate times in this post’s conments alone. I probably wouldn’t have noticed you if it wasn’t for the absolutely weird insult that you keep repeating. No one will take what you’re saying seriously if you don’t change it up a little. Go ask your boss at the Russian troll farm for tips on how to troll better online.

        Stop clowning around.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    The US won the physical war but lost the soft war to Russia.

    The US is being couped, and we need to dethrone them before it’s too late.

    • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      In what way did the US win the physical war? Russia is still occupying a lot of the disputed territory.

      • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Aside from the territorial lines basically reaching a stalemate, Russia’s ability to wage large scale war has been utterly crushed.

        No one wants to get into a wider war, but they are in such a weak position now that even without the US, NATO would still completely shitrock them. The Russian Army is spent, the airforce is spent. They can do little more than lob missiles, drones, and launch ineffective ground assaults that have high casualties, and against a NATO army, would be wiped out to a man.

        Russia is spent militarily, they are in an extremely weak position.

  • ben_dover@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    i don’t know who needs to hear this, who in their right minds would see Ukraine as the aggressor in this war

    • DicJacobus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 months ago

      Imperialist Russians with an internal victim complex / Fetal alcohol syndrome, “Russia has never attacked anyone in its history - Sergei Lavrov, Current Foreign Minister of Russia”

      Americans who are so blinded by their hatred and confusion of something vaguely liberal that they immediatley turncoat for a foreign aggressor

      People who genuinely associate with Nazi and equiavalent ideology

      to name a few

      • ben_dover@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 months ago

        valid points, but none of those fit my internal definition of “in their right minds” in the first place 😅

  • helloworld55@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Negotiations without security assurances*

    This is the prime stickler with the USA-Ukraine deal that has been discussed on the news

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m all for diplomacy. Finding diplomatic solutions to these kinds of problems is the ideal outcome.

    When it’s not ideal and you’re dealing with someone irrational or uncooperative, then maybe fighting isn’t the worst way to go.

    Bluntly, I support Ukraine. They’re clearly trying to make diplomacy work.

    I can’t say the same for Putin/Russia.

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      In some book there were cannons stamped with “the ultimate reason of kings”. Seems appropriate here.

      Quicksilver by Neal Stephenson maybe?

  • Arghblarg@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This ^^^ so much

    Do not trust Russia, and do not trust the US under current administration, or while the GOP still exists. We in the rest of the world are ON OUR OWN and must band together against this push of fascism across the world. This is not a drill, this is not a joke. Fascism is again on the rise, as it was in the 1930s. We all know where that led, so don’t let it do so again!