• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    It’s because it isn’t a silo?

    Discord, Slack and a bajillion similar apps do not meld with other apps. Email just happened to hit critical mass before “let’s try to get a monopoly” became the slogan of all tech, and collectively Big Tech is too stupid/hostile to replace it with some cooperative protocol.

    iMessage is another pure example of this.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      There are tons of open messaging protocols that have been replaced by closed ones. For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

      For some reason, likely tied to how it is used, email survived as an open protocol.

      • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

        IRC lacks a massive amount of features that discord users typically want. Screensharing, VCs with group and camera support, built-in history (don’t need to use a bouncer like on IRC), built-in online GIF searcher and sender with one click, huge community of bots that use discord’s API to do anything from games to moderation.

        It isn’t even close.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 hours ago

          ICQ and AIM managed to draw a huge crowd in the early (ish) days of home Internet.

          It’s not about features…it’s about ease of use.

          Also, IRC wasn’t as decentralized as email to begin with, there were several isolated networks that would not communicate with each other (dalnet, EFnet, undernet, etc)

          • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It’s not about features…it’s about ease of use.

            Its absolutely about both features and ease of use. If your program doesn’t do what people want from it, then good luck.

            Its also irrelevant to talk about considering I have used IRC and highly doubt that people are going to consider it easier to use than discord.

            • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Yeah I’m giving the ease-of-use points to Discord.

              I’d agree that both are big, sure…but ICQ and AIM didn’t have attachments or GIFs or screensharing, They barely had text formatting. Yet they were still bigger than the semi-decentralized (but at least standards-based) IRC. The features weren’t the big lure, it was the ease of use.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Discord (to me) has better UX than any IRC I’ve ever experienced.

        Email, on the other hand, is total baloney if it’s not interoperable. It’s why SMS/MMS is like a zombie that just won’t die, and telecoms are more cooperative than most of Big Tech.

      • Revan343@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Yeah, it’s the widespread adoption/necessity that made email what it is. Discord was able to largely replace IRC because not a lot of people were using IRC. Everybody has an email account though-- you need one to order a pizza ffs