Before you get mad at me, when was the last time you watched it?

  • Dialogue is mediocre
  • story left me indifferent
  • characters are one dimensional
  • there are no surprises
  • the world is cool tho
  • and my god are they crying a lot while carrying that MF to that Volcano 🌋

The best thing I can say about this movie trilogy is that it is kinda comfy

  • Lorindól@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    3 months ago

    The “Lord of the Rings” is not a character driven book and the same goes wirh the film adaptations. It is plot driven with heavy focus on world building, which can either make it an amazing or a boring experience. Depending on your preferences.

    Based on the list of your favourite films (excellent, BTW, some of my own favourites are there) you seem to prefer character driven ones. So I can easily understand why you find the LOTR films boring.

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      I love that the top comment isn’t everyone piling hate upon the poster but rather an analysis of why they most likely don’t like the series.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      LOTR itself is world building through characters, and building characters through their reaction to the world.

      The films are just action with lots of nice views.

  • overload@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    As someone who had a LOTR wedding theme, take your upvote and get the fuck out of here.

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Damn, I would have appreciated that. LOTR was huge in Australia and my family/friend group so it worked out.

    • kratoz29@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      LOTR is by no means a trilogy for everyone, I hope your guests liked the premise, or at least appreciated it (it was your day though, so the most important thing is that you had a blast).

      • overload@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Pretty nerdy friend group but honestly it was just a light theme for the reception, no pressure to dress up. Made the drinking more fun for all I think

  • Blackout@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    3 months ago

    I mean it’s no Crank starring Jason Statham but don’t worry. I’m sure they will release another Fast n the Furious sequel for you soon.

    • nebulaone@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Copied, because you didn’t read it: Favorite movies are:

      Memento

      Reservoir Dogs

      Everything Everywhere All At Once

      The Shining

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think the problem is you’re not watching the extended versions… All in one showing… Without bathroom breaks… Like a normal person…

  • CrazyLikeGollum@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only people I’ve ever met who share this opinion are people who’ve spent their entire life viewing things that are fast-paced action movies or movies where characters are defined entirely by a handful of quippy one-liners and a melodramatic flash back and then have all of their character development confined to a singular moment of epiphany. Movies where they would be alphabet level predictable if they didn’t move onto the next hackneyed trope at whiplash inducing paces.

    If you spend your entire life watching the cinematic equivalent of cocaine of course sobriety is going to be boring.

    • aesopjah@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Haha, right! Gandalf straight up falls into a pit with a demon-being and then comes back. If someone predicted that then that would be incredible.

  • mienshao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m all for valid criticisms, but mediocre dialogue and one-dimensional characters? And your fave movies are Momento and Reservoir Dogs? The math ain’t mathing.

    Like what you like, but I call bullshit. Logging this under “I said some controversial shit to stir up online discourse.” Enjoy my downvote, sir.

  • remon@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Well … take you’re upvote. Now go burn in hell.

    (Watched all extended editions last year).

  • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My family watches it every year

    -the dialog is pretty iconic

    -story is simple, it’s fine though

    -the characters are pretty simple, but they are still interesting in their own way imo

    -the ending to return of the king does undeniably drag

    Honestly I think it’s a pretty polarizing film series. It takes some huge gambles in including a lot of pretty deep lore and details that most people probably don’t care about. Most people i know who’ve seen it say they either love it or found it boring. I’ve never met someone who said the series is “pretty good”.

    I will say, the lack of reliance on plot twists makes it more rewatchable. That and the absolutely beautiful sets and costumes. In today’s age of CGI and now AI, we will never see the like of it again. EDIT: How could I forget the soundtrack?

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Never felt compelled to see the movies, but the books were some of the most pompous, boring things I ever read. Multiple pages of battle songs, crap like that? I read the entire trilogy and The Hobbit, waiting to get to the “good part”, for it to click in. But it never did.

    • nebulaone@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      It seems some people here think it is impossible to dislike the movies and I am just talking shit on purpose, so thank you for being a breath of fresh air. Here have some dino nuggies:

  • hope@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    Last month. I’d tried watching them many times before and always fell asleep, but this time I was engaged the whole time.

  • Sentient Loom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah they were way too emotional in the movie. I much prefer the seriousness of the book where they acted like mature adults. And Gandalf was more badass in the books, and Gimli wasn’t just comic relief in the books. But the visuals were amazing in the movie. 10/10 for visuals.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.worldBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      In the books they acted like saga characters with some transcendent (in otherwise medieval surroundings) knowledge of the ideals of French revolution and Catholic distributism mixed in strange ways.

      In the movies they acted like entertainment park animators. Too much superficial glossiness, too little of the feeling of the book, say, Barrow-Downs, I still remember how the descriptions of the rain and the sun and the stones felt.

  • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I agree that a story so iconic that spawned endless imitations in the last 70 years might feel a little clichè…

    About the dialogue, what did you expect? Frodo and Sam talking about the real meaning of Like a Virgin while climbing mt. Doom? Of course it is plain, the script isn’t triyng to present something unexpected like a Tarantino movie, it’s all about each character’s lore and world building and the dialogue serves this purpose very well

  • kubok@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    OP, did you read the books? By today’s standards, they may be a tad boring, but these were the books that created the clichhés in the first place. The movies were pretty decent for their time (although RotK was waaaayyyyy too long), but I did not feel that the books were done much justice. And there was too much ‘humorous’ dialougue shoehorned in. The Legolas-Gimli-Bromance was hard to watch, even then. That in and of itself makes the movies overrated.

    Also, as for ‘there are no surprises’, the story of the movies differed from the books. LotR fans were unpleasantly surprised by that.

    Off-topic: the Hobbit movies were abonimations. I fucking hate them.

    • nebulaone@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Nope I didn’t read the books and sure LotR made fantasy somewhat mainstream, I can’t deny that.