Crony's Dungeon
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前

Evolution

slrpnk.net

message-square
55
link
fedilink
686

Evolution

slrpnk.net

Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前
message-square
55
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or # to comment.
  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 个月前

    Sharks: Sharks.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    4 个月前

    Anteaters are more likely than weasels

    https://www.science.org/content/article/things-keep-evolving-anteaters-odd-animals-arose-least-12-separate-times

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 个月前

      wow this is fascinating, thanks for sharing!

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Echo location ant eaters

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 个月前

    Crustaceans: Crab

    Mammals: Weasel Crab

    Plants: Tree Grass. Everything grass.

    Amphibians & Reptiles: Unchanged because they are perfect Crab

    Birds: 360° around back to dinosaurs First of all, avian dinosaurs are dinosaurs. Secondly, 360° doesn’t really make sense, probably they meant 180°. Finally, crab.

    Fungi: I shan’t speculate on the affairs of gods.

    Moral of the story: You might not like it but decapods are peak animal evolution. All roads lead to crab.

    • Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 个月前

      Plants? Crabgrass.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        ^ Winner of the thread.

      • theorychapter@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        Hotel? Trivago.

    • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 个月前

      Mammals: Anteater

      Ants: Crab

      Mammals: Crabeater

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 个月前

      Misusing 360° where you should use 180° is a running joke

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        Ah good point. I’m more used to people doing it unintentionally.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 个月前

      One fungus will eventually manage to mind control the crabs, like some already do with ants.

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 个月前

        Hopefully, in a less destructive and more symbiotic manner. As much as I have a grudge against odorous house ants, I wouldn’t wish cordyceps on them, much less our future crab descendents.

    • wabafee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 个月前

      I don’t mind being a crab imagine not working. Just be crab.

    • scholar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 个月前

      Even grass evolves to tree - look at bamboo

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        Or palms.

    • muzzle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 个月前

      Plant evolution is anything but stable. They keep evolving and devolving from weeds to trees and back every few 100 generations.

    • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 个月前

      360° makes sense if the starting point was dinosaurs. Birds would be the 180° mark.

    • la508@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Ring the crab bell

    • rozodru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      you seem like an expert and I was actually wondering this yesterday while I was out on a walk cause I tend to think about silly things. So Theropods evolved into birds right? what about Sauropods or like Triceratops? or did they just go extinct

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 个月前

        Groups never evolve into something. Species do.

        Theropods are a group comprising a lot of species.

        There was one species of theropod that evolved a few characterics we associate with birds. They evolved into a few species and some of them evolved into yet more species. They’re at the origin of the whole bird group.

        See it like a tree with branches branching out with many branchss just getting cut short. One of that branching branch is the bird group, and it’s on the branching branch of theropod.

        And yes, the branching branchs that are Sauropods and Ornithischia were all completely cut at the Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction 65 million years ago.

        • rozodru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 个月前

          Thank you, appreciate the answer.

        • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 个月前

          Yeah. It was admittedly a bit heartbreaking to discover that it appears that there are no extant descendents of any sauropod or ornithischia species. :(

      • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 个月前

        These are actually questions that I’ve asked and done digging about in info sources on. I’m sad to report that it does appear that only descendents of theropod species appear to have survived. :(

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Secondly, 360° doesn’t really make sense, probably they meant 180°.

      It makes sense if you consider birds to be a mid-360° position of dinosaur evolution. They started at “classic” dinosaurs, pivoted to the avian variety, and will continue to pivot until they return to their classic form.

    • cheloxin@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      360° could be implying they are already that and that they’ll go through some cycle from being modern dinosaurs into future dinosaurs, but remaining much the same at the start and end positions. Or they were one of the many that never did understand angles and degrees during geometry 🤷‍♂️

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 个月前

    Beatles. Beatles everywhere. Bowl cuts will go crazy.

  • Glytch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 个月前

    Even the gods fear the fungal network.

  • pruwyben@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 个月前

    Fungus head out to seed another planet.

    • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 个月前

      WAAAGH!

  • pooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 个月前

    All the fish are dead, of course.

    • wander1236@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 个月前

      Fish already don’t exist

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 个月前

        What do you mean? Of course fish exist!

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=On2V_L9jwS4

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C3lR3pczjo

      • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 个月前

        You are thinking of birds.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 个月前

      Fish are three of the categories listed in the meme.

      • CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 个月前

        What three?

        • egrets@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 个月前
          Fish, fish, and fish.

          Mammals, amphibians/reptiles, and birds

  • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 个月前

    Crustaceans: Extinct

    Mammals: Extinct

    Plants: Extinct

    Amphibians & Reptiles: Extinct

    Birds: Extinct

    Fungi: Interstellar hive-mind

  • Mac@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 个月前

    Evolution by Stephen Baxter (Wikipedia) was an interesting read.
    Note: Baxter can be dry at times but i always enjoy the worlds he creates.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 个月前

      I respect the hell out of Baxter, he’s a hard sci-fi artist. However, he’s so unrelentingly bleak I had to quit reading his stuff.

      • Mac@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 个月前

        Can you share where you felt that way? Been a while since I’ve read him.

        • Machinist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 个月前

          The midpoint to the end of Evolution, humans basically devolve and ultimately go extinct.

          It’s been awhile since I’ve read anything by him as well.

          I remember another book where artifically created people inside a dwarf star were dying due to solar harvesting, IIRC. I remember it being depressing but fascinating. Don’t remember how it ends.

          • Mac@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 个月前

            Yeah, very fair. I guess i quite like the bleakness. I love dark and gritty stories.

            • Machinist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 个月前

              He’s an incredible author, I’d put him up there with Alastair Reynolds. I just can’t handle it.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 个月前

    Everything in the system evolves into a cloud of dust and gas about 27 million years from now.

    • ryedaft@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 个月前

      That’s… that’s very soon. What do you know‽

  • 𒉀TheGuyTM3𒉁@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 个月前

    Hot take: the fungi will take over all existing animal and plant life, and create a whole biosphere of fungi. Fungi crustaceans, fungi mammals, fungi plants, fungi amphibians, fungi reptiles, fungi birds.

    The fungi humans would have achieved world peace, because there’s no genders to create inequalities, and with spores flying everywhere, unwanted infidelity and physical differences are so common that anger and jealousy makes no sense.

    • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      Sure, but we will always have racism to fall back on

  • AnarchistArtificer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 个月前

    “shan’t” is a great word

  • CannedYeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 个月前

    There’s a phenomenal documentary series called The Future Is Wild that speculates on this question.

    https://youtube.com/@thefutureiswildofficial

    https://www.thefutureiswild.com/

    It has 3 parts, projecting to 5, 100 and 200 million years into the future.

    The main theme is that niches determine attributes. So when an opportunity opens up, one species will evolve to fill that niche. For instance sea birds evolve into whales. Octopodes evolve into primates.

    I loved this as a kid. It was one of a handful of really influential pieces of media from my childhood.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 个月前

      I’m actually surprised octopus haven’t evolved more than they already have. I suppose they would have to evolve skeletons to be able to survive on land so that’s probably what’s holding them back.

  • muzzle@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 个月前

    Plants keep evolving and devolving into trees every 100 generations.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 个月前

    We seemed to have it all hammered out. Love me some Cambrian explosion, wild shit! It was like the 1910-1920s for the industrial age. “Throw it at the wall and see what sticks!”

Microblog Memes@lemmy.world

microblogmemes@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !microblogmemes@lemmy.world

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

  • !whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works
  • !curatedtumblr@sh.itjust.works
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 990 users / day
  • 4.62K users / week
  • 9.04K users / month
  • 20.4K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 9.85K subscribers
  • 3K Posts
  • 77.8K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Ready! Player 31@lemmy.world
  • aeronmelon@lemmy.world
  • needanke@feddit.org
  • BE: 0.19.13
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org