cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/nonpolitical_comics/p/1657114/mr-lovenstein-volume


Hey everyone! In case you haven’t noticed, this is a new community focused on NonPolitical Comics (NPCs), which essentially means no gloom and doom of the day stuff. If you like the idea, help out by upvoting, commenting, or even talking about us! Remember, click like and subscribe!

  • Eternal192@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    6 days ago

    One of the main reasons i watch everything with subtitles, people used to be amused when i would watch an english movie with english subtitles, then they got apartments with poor sound proofed walls and floors, they weren’t so amused anymore.

  • ameancow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is so common and so irritating that it literally makes me not look forward to watching movies, particularly at home in a shared living space. I don’t even watch many movies anymore because it’s annoying watching with subtitles all the time.

    This is what getting old looks like people, take note.

    That thing that mildly annoys you right now? It won’t go away, it will get worse, then your intolerance of thing will lead to avoiding the thing. Next thing you know, someone is asking you “Did you see the new Sooperfoob and Jerry movie? it’s amazing! Best one of the franchise!” and you’re going to be like… 😶

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yes. TV speakers have gotten incredibly cheap and low quality. It’s audio/visual. You’ve invested a fair chunk into half of the experience with a TV, but ignored the other half.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              I think they were better at least, and mostly because there was space for them. In a CRT you had enough volume inside the TV to have even just little 2" drivers, now with ultrathins it’s hard to fit any even moderately okay speaker in there.

          • 87Six@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            I didn’t, really…I can barely afford a 1080p TV. I’m not buying a sound bar, screw that, rather do something else.

        • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          If you’re watching movies mixed for surround sound on the stereo speakers on your TV, you’re gonna have a bad time

          I would know, I do it all the time

          • 87Six@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m glad I’m no avid of movies. Wasn’t enough that TV’s are so locked down and spying on me, now I’d have to buy extra stuff too… Screw that noise…

            • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              I appreciate TVs not wasting resources on putting decent speakers in it that I’ll never use because I did buy a soundbar over a decade ago that has decent sound and has outlasted the TV I bought it for. Plus TVs are so thin these days that they probably can’t even drive decent bass, and the speakers they do have are rear facing, so they don’t even drive the sound towards you.

              Modularity isn’t a bad thing IMO.

              • 87Six@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 days ago

                Okay this I can completely agree with actually, good take. You changed my mind and you’re right.

                I kinda wish some things would be simple but eh it is what it is.

                • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  Oh yeah, I understand the sentiment entirely. With so many dark patterns dominating the world we live in because we live in a society that decided to embrace greed instead of seeing it as a primary motivator of evil, I can’t blame anyone that looks at the state of things with suspicion anytime there are downsides. And while it isn’t realistic to expect as good audio from a built-in system as a separate dedicated audio system, I do think it’s ridiculous that the standard is so dysfunctional that you either can’t understand what people are saying or explosions are way too loud. Especially in this digital world where mixing separate audio channels isn’t a difficult task. Streaming services should just have a stereo and mono version of the audio that is mixed well for that format if it is actually a harder problem than I think it is.

                  Some of it is practicality, but I don’t doubt that greed also plays into it. I mean, even on the modularity side, I don’t have the option of easily finding a TV without any speakers at all, or a TV without smart features that a) aren’t as good as other options I have to access those features and b) were actually thrown in to spy on data, as your previous comment mentioned.

                  So yeah, I don’t blame you at all for being suspicious of the companies that absolutely are trying to fuck their users because their real customers are data buyers, even if I do prefer my soundbar.

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Home theatre systems have been a thing for decades. Soundbars are the cheaper and simpler new alternative.

              Alternatively you can just use a media player thay compresses audio. This is easier if you use a PC connected to your TV but I’m sure some TV apps allow it too.

            • Corhen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              you’ve had to buy ‘extra stuff’ for decades. The TV is only half the equation.

              Its buying a DSLR camera, and being upset it didn’t come with the best lens. It comes with one that works, but you arn’t going to have good results.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Yes, because there’s a limit to how thin a screen can be and still fit decent speakers, and that sailed by 20 years ago.

        • Honytawk@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          No, but the solution is different if you were to have a sound bar or are using the build-in speakers.

      • ameancow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        “Whatcha doing housemate?”

        “Rigging 5.1 surround-sound that I can’t fucking afford, so that the bass and explosions absolutely rip through your walls, but at least I can hear the whispering.”

        Yeah fuck that. I’ve had surround sound before. It’s not remotely the issue I’m complaining about. It’s about audio volume mixing for home screens for average people who just have a TV and thin walls.

        • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          So, you haven’t invested in your audio. You have a TV, great, but tv speakers are basically phone speakers.

          You don’t need a big surround sound system, but you need something. Even the cheapest sound bars will likely solve this problem for you.

            • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              6 days ago

              Your personal finances are your business. I am here saying why you can’t hear anything. If the audio is bad, the invest in better audio, simple as that.

              • ameancow@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                6 days ago

                Yah I am dying to continue to feed the system that requires us to spend more money than we already did for stuff we own to get decent experience from it rather than add one fucking toggle that balances audio for people who aren’t interested in chasing optimization by feeding corporations more of our labor. Go play with your lootboxes.

                • luluberlue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  “The system” is physics. You can’t have tiny speakers embeded in a flat screen sound as good as a dedicated sound system due to how sound works. Same goes for phones camera, the tiny size just cannot compete against bigger, dedicated hardware due to how light works.

                  So go ahead and go fight the universe if you want, I’ll be here enjoying my audio on big ass speakers you can find in a thrift shop since those things existed for decades.

                  Pretty sure the “corporation” that made my speakers in the 70’s are well fed with the non-existant money I sent them.

                • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  K. You asked why your sound was bad, I gave an answer. Your opinions on if it should or shouldn’t be that way are not relevant, this is the way it is. If you want good sound, you have to buy it. I can’t change society or manufacturers for you, I am only a guy explaining how you can get good sound.

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Or you could just enable something like Loudness Equalization on whatever device you are playing the content from.

      The getting old part is you not searching for a solution and just complaining.

  • Strider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    6 days ago

    FYI this is one of the main differences between the Hollywood and German soundtracks.

    Here it’s mixed far better to listen in stereo while in surround cinematic you need to turn the front speaker up, if you have that system. And it doesn’t translate well to stereo.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      Hollywood mixes are just awful, have been for decades now. You can go to the theater and have quiet voices and blown-out eardrums from a race scene.

      I have a middle-to-upper-end 5.1 setup and have to fiddle with it like hell to keep the voices audible without ruining the action scenes.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            I haven’t watched it yet. Kinda want to, I have a low bar for video enjoyment. Maybe I’ll throw it on my phone and wait for a no-network time, but i’ll make sure i have subs for it :)

          • tetris11@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Scene:

            • Important person walks into a room
            • “Needless exposition about how rich and influential that person is”
            • Another important person walks into a room
            • “More needless exposition about how rich and influential that person is”
            • “That person is rich and influential?”
            • *wry smile*

            Next scene, more of the same

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes basically what I said, but some say it’s good for reasons that elude me. So I try to stay on the technical base to avoid discussion.

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Wouldn’t that be a question of studio sound versus scene sound? The original sound is usually recorded with a boom mic, resulting in a wider dynamic range, whereas the German voiceover can be recorded in a studio, without interference and the speakers much closer to the mic.
      The alternative would be to give each actor a lapel mic which would then have to be edited out of the video and would also be infeasible in some situations.

  • SoloCritical@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 days ago

    And this is why I, a genius, watch my content with subtitles. So I can keep the volume at a perpetually low level whilst still understanding what is being said even when it isn’t in a language I speak.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      6 days ago

      Older movies tended to have audio mixes where the dialogue was clear even when loud things were happening, people shouldn’t need to use a compressor.

      • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They also didn’t have much dynamic range, it’s much easier to compress the range than expand it

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          I have not had a great experience with compression.

          A couple TVs would have the audio delayed slightly, enough that the last syllable spoken was after they closed their mouths. Most of them also did a terrible job playing from TV speakers if the audio was in the center channel and I could not set it to stereo.

          Also I find the leveling or night settings make it harder to hear because while the speaking volume is raised that doesn’t make it clearer. So if there is background music the same volume it is just muddled at a higher volume.

          Compression is better than nothing but in no way comparable to a mix that is actually intentionally made to reduce the dynamic range. Having one mix and letting the compressor software fudge the balance is lazy and has mediocre results.

          • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            I still feel like it probably works better than trying to expand a flat mix. Center channel dialogue is a different issue imo, there should definitely be 2.0 mixes available for streaming content auto-downmixing will always be bad.

            • [deleted]@piefed.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 days ago

              Center channel dialogue is part of the overall issue of only having one 5.1 high dynamic range mix available to play on a wide range of devices with vastly different setups.

  • Honytawk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    By default I enable Loudness Equalization, which makes soft sounds louder and loud sounds softer.

    I don’t care about the dynamic range if you can’t understand what they are saying.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    6 days ago

    I had such a situation years ago. I was listening to Mike Oldfields “Tubular Bells II” on headphones. For the first time. There is a sequence where the music stops, and a child is telling something. I turned up the volume to hear it, and got the last words “and nothing was ever heard of him again, except for the sound of tu-bu-lar bells”, and then came BANG the promised bell…

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    Pay for better audio people. TV companies make big shiny displays but out smartphone sized speakers in them. Gone are the days where you can get good audio from your TV. Even the cheapest sound bars will make a difference.

    It’s not your ears. It’s your sound equipment.

    • D_C@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Nope. Not always.

      I have a none cheap but not super expensive soundbar. We were watching the film Phantoms the other night and the sound was just terrible.
      The women’s voices were very clear but the men’s voices were inaudible whispers.
      Turn it up …FUCK YOU, ACTION SCENE
      Turn it down
      Peter O’Toole introduced. We can hear him clearly because he was classically trained.
      Go back to usual men talking and just whispers again.
      Turn it up. FUCK YOU I SAID, ACTION SCENE
      Oh FFS, turn it down.

      It was like that all the way through.

      I have all the clear voice options working. I have tinkered on the sound profile on my TV to help try to lose the bass and give a bit more clarity on the voices but sometimes it’s just the shit way the audio on the film is mixed.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 days ago

        FYI, I am not the person you replied to.

        The part where the comm it’s from is trying to not be political is, apparently, political. Some people here seem to think that spending every waking moment inside a landscape of political doom is a necessary purity test.