• grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    24 days ago

    On the contrary: vampires are an allegory for the upper class, being parasites who suck the blood (wealth) from society.

    (Also, the nature of being immortal means you have plenty of time to wait for your investments to appreciate, so all but the newest vampires should be wealthy enough to afford a castle if they want.)

  • notabot@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    24 days ago

    Any vampire that doesn’t live in a castle or similatly expensive abode is either a) fairly new to the vampiring game, b) actively chosing not to, or c) terrible at investing.

    • Hazmatastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      24 days ago

      I’ve said it before and ill say it again: if you can’t make money as an immortal, you just can’t make money

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        23 days ago

        you’re immortal you’ll eventually learn that the blind accumulation of wealth is a treacherous poison and that the true treasure is community.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          Arguably a castle is a fortress first an abode second. Part of the reason why castles are so expensive now is because the cheap sturdy ones got used for other things over time and the less sturdy ones were abandoned and ruined, this leaves us with the castles that are expensive and annoying to repair.

          A vampire could definitely set things up to have an easy to maintain easy to live in fortress akin to Roman castra for them and their clan. Relatively easy to upgrade with the most expensive elements being the living space since the walls probably only need large scale work every hundred years or so.

  • lemonwood@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    24 days ago

    Yes, Dracula lived in a castle because he was a landlord. But all classic vampires in literature are in a sense. Originally, in oral history and folk takes, vampires were more about fear of sickness and about not understanding how diseases spread. But later, literary Vampires were a standin for the universal experience of how landlords are bloodsucking pests. Take Dracula: the protagonist is a solicitor who comes to Transylvania to help the vampire buy land and various properties in England. Then the plot revolves around preventing his moving to England, but the heroes fail at that, because he has prepared to well, is just too rich and has filled out all the legal paperwork.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    The monsters have never been the problem, it’s always been class warfare. The nobility are the monsters

    • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 days ago

      I was gonna say something about how there should be a modern setting with working class vampires. Then I remembered that vampire the Masquerade exists and has the Anarchs.