Tate looks like a potato you forgot in the back of a cabinet and started to grow
Don’t insult the potatoes. You plant them and grow more potatoes.
Wtf does Tate have to offer?
prostitution and sex trafficking. But besides that not much…
oh wait I forgot, he doesn’t support the independence of women; just sex trafficking.
To be fair Tate grew a lot more tates.
At least potatoes are nutritious and respect women.
Like the potato, if you plant him under the ground, the world becomes a better place.
You make an excellent point. We have never buried Tate underground to test this. Maybe he can do the same as the potato.
Let’s at least give him reasonable doubt and bury him. Then after 3 or 4 months we’ll have our answer
And risk he’ll actually sprout and multiply?
To run a fair test, we need to divide a body into different sections each containing an eye. Or part of an eye.
potatoes are actually useful and quintessential
They are hardy and are a great source of starch. Love the potato.
Now you listen here! You got a problem with potatoes you got a problem with me and I suggest you let that one marinate
Marinate… In butter?
Tater
What’s manosphere, precious?
There’s nothing more alpha than fucking a dude. Let’s just give them that.
“Your dad’s a good wrestler. But I’m better.”
I find women so attractive that I don’t care if they have a dick or not. Damn
💯
“Human males are more attractive, look at peacocks”
“Also this isn’t gay at all, just look at ancient Greece!”
Rumour has it Tate fucked a peacock
allegedly
folks are saying it was a sick peacock
If they really want to sell tickets for that UFC fight, they should make a couch shaped like a peacock and have Tate and Vance battle for the right to fuck it.
I always love when people make the connection with ducks for example. Like have you seen a female duck? Yeah they aren’t as colorful, but their pattern is way more interesting and they are absolutely beatiful in their own right.
Also, idk, I think that what an ape thinks looks good has little bearing on what avians find attractive. For all we know male ducks think that bright plumage is unattractive.
Like for real, would parrots looking at us understand what we see in permanent large breasts? Or would they look at our other comically oversized sex characteristic (large, exposed penises without a baculum) as the primary showy mating display. Or would they see us as a species where sexual selection has resulted in both parties having a display to show off? Would they think that from their perspective it’s obvious which looks better?
Ducks think? Do they quack in their dreams?
Tate’s looking at cocks all right, someone are probably pea’in
Can’t argue with the math
The Greeks invented sex but the Romans finetuned the concept by finding out you could also have sex with women.
The original copypasta uses “orgies”. Since, you know, you can’t invent something that has existed before even humans.
Dude I heard that joke in the 80s. There’s a million variations.
Would be funny if all this manosphere shit was just a ploy to turn more twinks gay, so Tate could finally have the harem of his dreams.
Is this actually for real?
Would it change your opinion of these weirdos?
Yes. To be clear, all this makes them even stranger (and deeper in the closet?) than I previously knew.
Wait til you read up on Groypers and ‘operatives’.
So… it’s not then?
A deepened disdain is different from general disdain, curse of knowledge and all that.
Can’t say for sure. It wouldn’t change that all these people are trash. Let’s see, if true it’s sad that their stuck in a world that tells them it’s not on to be who they are. And thus feeling like being shit stains of a human is the better than loving the right person. If false someone else is lieing, these guys are horrible people, no lies necessary.
https://xcancel.com/Asmongold/status/2060392930695643535
Too many replies to verify the other two.
I am pretty sure at least one of these is not in the same thread or they have been reordered
I thought the same thing, and tried to find the 2 replies. In the grand scheme of things, it does not matter though, because all three of these ghouls would say whatever gets more attention because they are amorphous blobs of shite.
Guess they’ve never seen all of the statues of Athena, Artemis and Aphrodite. You don’t get as many nude female statues because it was usually considered obscene for women to be naked in public.
But the Greek male statues were fully nude and depicted ripped mortal men because they were made in line with Aristotle’s idea of good art being educational. Those were arguably the marble version of “git gud, scrub”.
If there were more male “perfect” body statues at the time, which we can’t establish because many have been lost over the millennia, it might actually be evidence that men were considered less attractive and they needed more body shaming to fix it?
Don’t forget nemesis:
I think Nemesis is Roman, but probably a copy of a Greek statue. I might have chosen to forget because the “restoration” work on her head breaks my heart - but I know that’s a common problem. Such a pity because the drapery is gorgeous.
Looking at this Diana/Artemis, who was much luckier than most statues by having her original head reattached, you can see how different it is. The proportions make much more sense.
Image text description below image:
Photo of a marble statue of Artemis (aka Diana), which lives at the Louvre. Artemis is mid-step reaching for an arrow in the quiver on her back. In her other hand she’s pulling on the antlers of a small deer that she has caught. She’s wearing a short and practical belted tunic (chiton) appropriate for hunting, functional sandals, and an equally pragmatic hairstyle with her wavy locks in an up-do. Her arms and legs are neither skinny nor super muscly, they’re very average looking. But, being a goddess, she’s got a tiara. Not an ostentatious tiara, a simple solid tiara. A utility tiara, if you will. And being a female goddess, you can still see her nips pushing on the intricate drapery of her chiton. She’s clearly got some sex appeal carved in, but the statue is of a capable person who is independently getting shit done.
I love her because she basically looks like the kind of woman a modern conservative commentator would condemn for subverting gender roles. Also with a proportional head.
deleted by creator
Right they were “lost over time”. You’ve got a bunch of ripped naked Greek guy statues in your basement don’t you
I wish I had both any cool ancient things and any basement to put them in. I think the oldest thing I own is maybe 100 years at best.
I think I’d be terrified to own anything much older too, conservation is hard.
the hardest part of conservation is learning how to do it. like, i play saxophone and the instruments literally die and need expensive if you go too long without playing. how to take care of a sax? make sure your mouth is clean (like, rinse it out with water at least) before you play. ABSOLUTELY do not eat anything or drink anything other than water (not even flavored water bullshit) while playing unless you want to go brush your teeth before picking your sax up again. don’t leave your spit swab in while it’s in the case even though it fits so perfect in there, and play it regularly (like at least once a week but once a day is better) to make sure the cork doesn’t literally die. so sax conservation boils down to playing often and keeping your mouth clean.
guess how i ruined my first sax dudes. it was not doing this shit above.
deleted by creator
There was a quote I saw recently that said something along the lines of the idea that if your satire becomes indistinguishable from that which you’re satirizing it ceases to be a joke and just becomes more fuel for your target.
deleted by creator
Only 'cause those ones are lost.
During high school I was friend with a guy from a village known for their conservative takes. And while this guy certainly wasn’t as left as some of my other friends, he liked to fuck with his football teammates by making the take that gay sex is manly.
Why? Because it involves two men. Hetero sex wasn’t as manly because it involves a girl, and lesbian sex was as girly as it got. His teammates really didn’t get that he was fucking with their worldview.
Now he definitely had very idiotic takes himself, but this one always stuck with me because it’s just so easy to troll any insecure right winger with
As a lesbian I’ve definitely seen plenty of gay interactions that are so gendered that I feel most people of the other gender wouldn’t be comfortable participating, especially conservative straight people. It’s really funny to me how this stereotype of gay people as less gender conforming (while it absolutely carries a lot of truth to it) results in people not even considering that sometimes gay sex is just two really masculine men going at it in a manly way or two women being extremely feminine together.
Was he wrong though?
Alpha version males are buggy and barely work. Kinda useless.
The “on average”-qualifier in there working like a lifeboat on a plane falling from the sky over the Sahara
Also
Does this man actually know what “gay” means?
I begin to think he means that in original meaning…
“I dumno which rapper is beefing with which other rapper because I am not happy”
“I agree man are more attractive on average because I am not happy”
I think he doesn’t know what beefing means
Well…maybe he just thinks “beefing” means shoving their beef stick intothe others man hole.
If he thinks thats what beefing is, I could see why he thinks it’s gay.
I mean, he’s wrong either way, but that would explain where his viewpoint is.
Beefing is when you’re getting fucked in the arse so hard that your partner manages to get some air up there, so you fart. Like queefing, but with none of that gay vagina stuff.
Why does this sound plausible
Because I am an expert in these matters.
source: am expert
Hey that’s not true you’re a Bigfoot
The “it’s not gay if you’re the top” attitude seems surprisingly common.
Similar to “it’s not gay if you are raping/penetrating”
That’s a dangerous level of internalized self-loathing repression
