• 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      17 days ago

      I feel like your arm would probably hurt less than how hard the kickback shoots the gun unit itself into your face

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      17 days ago

      It looks like a flare gun that a larger caliber rifle round happens to fit inside. I could be wrong about that but I really don’t think it’s meant to fire that round.

  • assembly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    Is this real? I imagine that would have worse recoil than a shotgun shell and I think they only do 410 shells in a handgun. Is there someone out there capable of firing this?

    • disorderly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      17 days ago

      With a good weaver stance, proper lean, fingers over fingers grip, and firm isotension, who am I kidding this would suck ass.

      • Dookieman12@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        17 days ago

        From someone who has fired a .45-70 derringer, you’re absolutely correct. At a certain point, your wrist is getting torqued whether you like it or not.

    • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s a Rossi Riot, single shot 12 gauge pistol. It’s technically possible to fire .50 cal cartridges in a 12 gauge but it could wreck the gun.

      • Dookieman12@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Actually, the gun is completely safe. Many people have tested and confirmed this.

        12 gauge is actually like .54 caliber so most of the expanding gas passes around the projectile without building pressure. The projectile leaves the barrel way slower than normal, but still fast enough to be lethal, and not very accurately.

        • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          17 days ago

          It’s not the barrel. The case basically explodes in the chamber. Shotgun chambers aren’t built for that, and the extractor might not get the case out.

          • Dookieman12@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            17 days ago

            The case basically explodes in the chamber.

            Yeah, that’s how firearms work.

            When the gun and the cartridge match, the diameter of the projectile is slightly larger than the barrel bore. For example, a .357 magnum cartridge is .357 inches, stuffed into what’s ostensibly a .35 caliber gun. Gunpowder isn’t an explosive, it actually burns very slowly. It’s this very small size difference that allows pressure to build and create the chamber pressures advertised on the ammo box.

            Of course a shotgun receiver can’t withstand the same pressure as a .50 BMG receiver, but that’s not what I said. I said a .50 BMG cartridge won’t create enough pressure in a 12 gauge receiver to damage it.

            But, by all means, don’t take my word for it. There are plenty of videos of other people doing it and explaining it. Watch one of those instead.

            Extraction and cycling are a whole other story, I’m not referring to that. 12 gauge shells are rimmed, .50 BMG is rimless, of course it probably won’t cycle in most shotguns.

            • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Oh wow, thank you for explaining how guns work. You’re so smart!

              It’s weird that my guns never destroy the brass. Does that mean they don’t work?

              And I guess C4 isn’t an explosive either, because it burns slowly?

              And I never said anything about the receiver. The chamber is a different part. And the cartridge will absolutely build up pressure before the bullet has time to leave.

              Is your firearm knowledge just based on YouTube?

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      It’s kinda hard to tell from this picture, but it looks like some kind of .308 or maybe .30-06 cartridge.

      Single-shot handguns that fire large rifle rounds certainly exist and fire much larger rounds than that. Kentucky Ballistics on YouTube has many videos showing his collection of them. The video where Eddie Hall fires them all is a good vid where he shows many of them off.

  • ProbablyUnwise@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 days ago

    I am seriously skeptical that that is a real gun that could fire without exploding, let alone you being able to hang on to it if it didn’t. you’re certainly not getting more than a couple shots max out of that before it and your hand is a mangled mess.

      • too_high_for_this@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Comparing .45-70 to .50 BMG is like comparing .22lr to .223 Remington.

        But this is a 12 gauge pistol with a .50 cal in it.

    • Dookieman12@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      17 days ago

      Your hand might take a beating, but the gun would be fine. Generally speaking, assuming there are no microfractures from manufacturing defects, if the steel and the design can withstand one shot, it can withstand tens of thousands. Assuming, of course, you perform the required PMCS and don’t fire so quickly as to overheat the steel.

  • Dookieman12@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    17 days ago

    I’ve often struggled to determine the use case for these kinds of guns. If you’re hunting, surely a long gun in the same cartridge would be a better choice. If only for emergency defense against large animals while hiking, surely a revolver with a slightly smaller cartridge would be worth having five shots instead of one before having to reload, right?

    Besides being a cool conversation piece or range toy, I’m not really sure what I’m supposed to do with something like this.

    • justdaveisfine@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      I think the only advantage these big bore single shot pistols have is that they’re relatively cheap compared to a revolver.

      Not a situation I’d cheap out on but I could see someone doing it.

      • Dookieman12@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        I just looked up the Rossi Brawler and it’s only $335, putting it around half the price as your cheapest .44 mag. I didn’t know they were that cheap, but it makes sense given the simple design. You can get it chambered in .300 blackout and it has a threaded barrel, so that’s pretty cool.

        That’s still only a little bit cheaper than an AR-15, which is going to be more effective at just about everything, so it’s probably still not something I would go for, but I think I’m seeing the appeal now. If you just gotta be able to put 5.56, .45 colt, or whatever down range, and that’s all you can afford, it sure beats nothing.