Throughout the 19th century, news reports and medical journal articles almost always use the plant’s formal name, cannabis. Numerous accounts say that “marijuana” came into popular usage in the U.S. in the early 20th century because anti-cannabis factions wanted to underscore the drug’s “Mexican-ness.” It was meant to play off of anti-immigrant sentiments.

  • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
    1522·
    2 months ago

    They left out some of the worst of it. (Edited to acknowledge that’s arguably an unfair statement for me to make. The article is specifically about the term marijuana, so what I added below is arguably out of scope for what they were reporting. Still, Ainslinger was off his fucking rocker on this shit. This isn’t even the only eyebrow raising quote from him on the topic.)

    Harry J Ainslinger was the first head of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, predecessor to the DEA. Here’s one of his quotes on the topic:

    There are 100,000 total marijuana smokers in the US, and most are Negroes, Hispanics, Filipinos and entertainers. Their Satanic music, jazz and swing, result from marijuana usage. This marijuana causes white women to seek sexual relations with Negroes, entertainers and any others.

    That was back in the early 20th century.

    More recently we have this from Nixon’s domestic policy head:

    In a 1994 interview, Mr. Ehrlichman said, “You want to know what this was really all about?” He went on:

    “The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

    The war on drugs has always been racist. Crack cocaine is an even more clear example.

    • shneancy@lemmy.worldEnglish
      451·
      2 months ago

      don’t forget psychadelics had the same fate! made illegal becuase they had “corrosive effects on cultural values” (had to put hippies in jail for being too peaceful)

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
        292·
        2 months ago

        Yep, conservatives throughout history have been the party of taking things away and making sure everyone hates everyone else.

        • Kintarian@lemmy.worldEnglish
          112·
          2 months ago

          Always amazes me that the very people who preach their rights and freedom are the very ones who want to take them all away. Oh, right, they want to take your rights away not theirs.

    • MyParentsYeetMe@lemm.eeEnglish
      402·
      2 months ago

      While I agree with most of what you said. The John Ehrlichman quote is pretty suspicious.

      It was released in 2014, 20 years after the interview. Because allegedly, despite the intense claims and weirdness reported (Ehrlichman suddenly bursting out with this monologue while pushing the interviewer out the door), the interviewer completely forgot about it until rereading his notes 20 years later, while also trying to promote a new book about Nixon. You’d think when interviewing someone that influential, and having them drop a reveal like that would’ve made it into his book at the time.

      But there has never been any corroboration from anyone else about Ehrlichman making these claims, his friends and family say he never said anything like that to them. And somehow, not a single other corroborater to this big conspiracy has come forward.

      Ehrlichman was long dead when this claim was released, and thus unable to verify he said it. Most news sources wouldn’t even report on it until buzzfeed spread it around, and comedians like ‘Adam Ruins Everything’ spread it as fact. Not hating on you, just hate disinformation. Nixon did so many fucked up things, yet somehow one bullshit quote by an author desperate for attention gets all the hype.

      • shalafi@lemmy.worldEnglish
        11·
        2 months ago

        Never questioned it, but that’s one hell of a long statement. Can anyone string that many sentences together, and so clearly?

        I was devouring On Writing yesterday and I could see Stephen King blasting that as bad dialog. Bad as in, unbelievable in a work of fiction.

    • athairmor@lemmy.worldEnglish
      14·
      2 months ago

      That was back in the early 19th century.

      I think you mean 20th century. There was no jazz in the 1800s.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
        6·
        2 months ago

        I did, I blame that I’d been awake about 5 min when posting. :D Will fix thank you!

    • HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.worldEnglish
      111·
      2 months ago

      Just lol @ the notion that smoking weed magically makes white women attracted to you, I can’t believe people fell for that bullshit

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.mlEnglish
        43·
        2 months ago

        Typical maga thinking honestly. Why wouldn’t she want to be with a “real man” (you know, a god fearing conservative macho white guy) instead of a guy like that? (you know, a non-white guy, or a soyboy, or whatever slur they are using at the moment) - must be drugs!

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.worldEnglish
          2·
          2 months ago

          Yeah “why is she with a black guy instead of me? Must be the weed” Like, no you dumbass he treats her like a person and you treat her like something you deaerve

    • 4am@lemm.eeEnglish
      61·
      2 months ago

      Wouldn’t be surprised to find out that some Project 2025 types had their slimy tendrils in the fentanyl crisis