• Novamdomum@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just wait till someone turns AI worship into a literal religion. I’m kinda surprised it hasn’t already started happening. That would be a heck of a turning point for humanity. Just takes someone to train an AI into thinking it’s a God and then we really are done.

    • pticrix@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      I mean, some ideologies in the TESCREAL bundle kinda are barreling toward that. What is the ideology behind Roko’s Basilisk if not that? They just aren’t organized yet - and I hope we can help those who fall for that lunacy before it becomes something more dangerous and sinister.

      • Novamdomum@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wow… there’s already labels for the sides that would fight each other: “Accelerationists” and “Doomers”. I really hope that’s not a road we all end up going down for real. Would make interesting fiction though!

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      oh we’re like half a step away from that. hasn’t the CEO of openAI recently started to lose his mind? apprently, he was asking his AI about government secrets or other conspiracy shit and the AI, lacking actual government secrets, dished him out SCP foundation creepypasta presented as facts, and he thought the AI has trascended something and now knows everything

    • InputZero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      There have been a few techno-cults and tech-worshipers. The one that always comes to my mind in these discussions is Terry Davis and his creation Temple OS. Terry Davis was a troubled man who did many inappropriate things, which did hurt people, and he did eventually take his own life. With that said, he believed that the Christian God exists and a person can hear him through computers. With that belief he built Temple OS, God’s digital temple. It’s really interesting.

    • tomiant@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      How out of the loop are you people? That has been a thing for a while, we’ve got more than a handful high profile AI religions and cults out there already…

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    3 months ago

    Everytime I see an image like this I think, it wouldn’t be so sad if it was what the picture implied. As in a physical humanoid that was almost human in behaviour. Chat bots are soooo far from that.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      at the very least it should run on a machine physically sitting in your home, and have a memory measured in years

      like holy fuck how can you get emotionally invested in a “”“person”“” who will forget things (or simply restart entirely) after like a month of talking to it and might just be shut down because the company moves to a new model???

  • PugJesus@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    3 months ago

    Loneliness and/or a need for validation drives people to crazy things. From joining cults and extremist groups without a pre-existing history of relevant prejudices or preconceptions, to enduring abusive social circles. To, now, falling in love with chatbots.

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      And boy oh boy don’t we have a loneliness for days! I’d say we even have sort of epidemic going on ;) Empty interactions and screaming just for echo to come back.

      • tomiant@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        The vast majority of conversations I have with people on a daily basis are on an order of magnitude more moronic than the ones I have with AI. So that also plays a part.

  • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is a serious thing in the autistic community, as in a very deadly one, character AI is an autistic suicidating machine, those shits should be just banned.

    • Uri@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      24
      ·
      3 months ago

      No one should decide what you should do on the internet.

      • syreus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Society requires regulation to reduce feedback loops. Everyone always assumes things can only be allowed or disallowed but there is a medium where the barriers to entry reduce the risk to bystanders while preserving liberty. See drivers licence, chemical aquisition background checks, etc.

      • A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        This thing is literally killing people, I’m full onboard on protecting privacy and personal freedom, but only up to the point of protecting vulnerable people first.

        Character AI and similar are profiting of vulnerable people.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Dangerous and addictive technologies and substances are always regulated. There’s a reason we don’t let ten year olds buy vodka.

        • ebolapie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, it’s cause you can sell them a bottle of tonic water for the same price. They don’t know the difference.

      • chunes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        How pathetic how much lemmy doesn’t like this comment. Even 15 years ago, censorship on the internet was taboo. Now these lame-ass losers want to pull the ladder up behind them after enjoying whatever the hell they wanted in peace.

      • Uri@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        It’s so weird to see people don’t understand internet censorship. Internet censorship will never bring good.
        If people want to die let them… It’s their choice. Who the fuck government is to decide what people will use.
        Censorship starts with one or two thing and become great firewall of China. Example : look at UK / wait a bit. Today they will ban a shit (eg. Facebook or whatever) You say I don’t use it. Tomorrow they will ban things you use

        • Nangijala@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Backwards mindset to say that censorship will never bring good.

          You okay with child porn too? How about all the naughty words that we aren’t supposed to say? Or encouragement of violence toward others? That shouldn’t be censored and removed?

          And honestly, I find it disturbing to say that if people want to kill themselves, they should just do it. Most suicidal people are stuck in a very dark place mentally that they CAN get put of if they get the right amount of help. Suicide isn’t always the correct solution. In most cases it, in fact, isn’t. It can be a desperate stress induced decision in response to a very difficult period in time for someone. Something where they seek relief in the moment, vut later are grateful they either didn’t go through with it or were saved. Have been in that dark pit myself and I’m so happy I didn’t go through with it even though I wanted it all to end for years.

          There indeed are areas where censorship goes overboard and that is something we will have to discuss and adjusted together in society forever as times passes. But censorship isn’t an all bad thing. It is absolutely insane to think that censorship of any kind online is bad. I don’t think you actually agree with your own statement, if you think really deeply about it. Unless of course, you have no morals or care for the safety and wellbeing of others.

  • Omni rizzler@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    i want my big milf skibidi AI sigma wifu which run on freebsd back otherwise i will burn meta and gaygal down

  • ekZepp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is just the tip of the iceberg.

    An (apparently) all know being who keep give smart(ish), calculated, pleasing answers to people projecting all their delusions. I’m surprised they don’t have already start worshipping them as Deity.

      • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I mean the “allow non verbal people to speak” thing has some merit though. Not LLMs per se, but the types of machine learning used by people trying to develop ways to decode the brainwaves of people to allow them to talk while physically unable are usually lumped in the general category of “AI” from what I’ve seen.

        • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          I’ve just had experiences with Ai help chats where when I started typing the Ai would try to finish my sentence and would jump the cursor around making it absolutely unusable. I had to type in note pad and copy it into the chat. Staggeringly useless. So if this ‘mind reading’ Ai is like that I don’t predict good results.

          Also, fuck you quickbooks.

          • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            I mean, any technology can be stupid if it is utilized stupidly, which I would think taking over someone’s keyboard while they’re tping would qualify as. But why would a company deploying a technology in a stupid manner mean that someone else’s research into a different but related technology is guaranteed to produce equally poor results?

        • zqps@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Yeah that’s not what they mean. They mean feeding recorded texts and speeches of a person into an llm, then instruct it to pretend to be that person. Like that AI murder victim “testimony” that was permitted to be shown in court as “evidence” some time ago.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          i mean i’m pretty sure we can enable people to communicate if they’re at all conscious and mentally able to communicate, stephen hawking was able to write despite literally only being able to move his eyes reliably. So long as a person can intentionally move one muscle we can rig something up to interpret it as morse code.

          is it great? no, these methods fucking suck, but they do work and we don’t need AI to do it.

  • 74 183.84@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    To be fair, we all know AI sexbots are coming. I suspect those future LLMussies are going to feel amazing

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, until they start choking you to death due to falsely thinking that that’s what you want. Sounds like a fun temptation but it’d still be ultimately introducing more IoT into my home, which is a “no” from me, dawg, due to hacking risk.

    • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      AI sexbots are already here. “AI” has become a synonym for just “artificial”, the “intelligence” bit seems to only be there for marketing purposes.

    • rustyfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Were Chobits ever meant to be fucked? Their ON/OFF switch is literally inside the opening representing their vagina. Seems inconvenient to me.

      I’ve seen that anime like 20 years ago and never thought about it since. But your comment catapulted this question back into the forefront of my mind.

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, OP’s out here trawling Reddit for stupid bullshit they can post here.

      To suggest Reddit is losing it from some niche subreddit nonsense is such typical Lemmy broad brush strokes. And it’s posted in Shitpost because hey, it’s just a Shitpost! Despite the fact it’s clearly more than that to OP.

      Shitposts are supposed to be stupid, they’re supposed to mean absolutely nothing, but instead it’s a circlejerk of reddit bad, America bad.

      But hey, I’m not a content poster, so I guess I ought to do more contenting before I can complain about the lack thereof.

      • ReHomed@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 months ago

        To be a bit fair, Reddit IS losing it.

        Multiple subs have been astroturfed to hell and back with alt-right nazislop, there’s just new shit appearing left and right that ONLY exist to hate minorities.