• sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    -“If you’re an AI Cop, you have to tell me. It’s the law.”
    -“I’m not a cop.”

  • cactusfacecomics@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    6 days ago

    Seems reasonable to me. If you’re using AI then you should be required to own up to it. If you’re too embarrassed to own up to it, then maybe you shouldn’t be using it.

      • eldebryn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        IMO if your “A*” style algorithm is used for chatbot or any kind of user interaction or content generation, it should still be explicitly declared.

        That being said, there is some nuance here about A) use of Copyrighted material and B) Non-deterministic behaviour. Neither of which is (usually) a concern in more classical non-DL approaches to AI solutions.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      7 days ago

      My LinkedIn feed is 80% tech bros complaining about the EU AI Act, not a single one of whom is willing to be drawn on which exact clause it is they don’t like.

      • utopiah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 days ago

        My LinkedIn feed

        Yes… it’s so bad that I just never log in until I receive a DM, and even then I login, check it, if it’s useful I warn people I don’t use LinkedIn anymore then log out.

        • madjo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          I even ignore DMs on linkedIn, they’re mostly head hunters anyway.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            Not a terrible resource when you’re actually looking for a job. But that’s because all the automated HR intakes are a dumpster fire, more than anything headhunters bring in value.

      • notarobot@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Did you seriously use LinkedIn? I always thougt that it was just narsisitic people posting about themselves never having any real conversations and only adding superficial replies to posts that align 100% with them

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          If I could delete it without impacting my job or career I would. Sadly they’ve effectively got a monopoly on the online professional networking industry. Cunts

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Very useful for job hunting because it’s swarming with head hunters.

          LinkedIn gets you access to humans who will help you navigate the shitty HR AI that most big businesses integrate into their job intake process.

      • Leon@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        They’re probably not super fond of the idea of AI not being allowed to be deployed to manipulate people.

      • Evotech@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I get it though, if you’re an upstart. Having to basically hire an extra guy just to do ai compliance is a huge hit to the barrier of entry

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          That’s not actually the case for most companies though. The only time you’d need a full time lawyer on it is if the thing you want to do with AI is horrifically unethical, in which case fuck your little startup.

          It’s easy to comply with regulations if you’re already behaving responsibly.

  • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    But Peter Thiel said regulating AI will bring the biblical apocalypse. ƪ(˘⌣˘)ʃ

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Okay, but when can the law straight up ban companies who don’t comply with the law from operating in the state instead of just slapping them on the wrist and telling them “no” the same way a pushover parent tells their child “no”. Especially after they just ignore the law.

  • hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    I am of the firm opinion that if a machine is “speaking” to me then it must sound a cartoon robot. No exceptions!

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 days ago

    bleep bloop… I am a real human being who loves doing human being stuff like breathing and existing

  • cley_faye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 days ago

    Be sure to tell this to “AI”. It would be a shame if this was a technical nonsense law to be.

  • minorkeys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    If you ask ChatGPT, it says it’s guidelines include not giving the impression it’s a human. But if you ask it be less human because it is confusing you, it says that would break the guidelines.

    • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      ChatGPT doesn’t know its own guidelines because those aren’t even included in its training corpus. Never trust an LLM about how it works or how it “thinks” because fundamentally these answers are fake.