• endless_nameless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “If you want to get into this bathroom you have to show me your pussy”

    “To prove I’m not trans?”

    “What? I don’t work here”

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    this is the more optimistic scenario. they actually want to do this with kids.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Pretty sure this one was posted already, and I commented something something JK Rowling.

  • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    48
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can always rely on Pizzacake to bring a nuanced and informed take to a given topic, rather than simply making a strawman argument.

    • Grail@multiverse.soulism.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The problem is when you represent TERFs the way they represent themselves, they lie. It’s not Pizza Cake’s fault that an honest TERF is a strawman.

      • Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        26
        ·
        1 day ago

        She’s made multiple comics making fun of men’s mental health issues, she very much seems to have it in for men in general.

        • Cypher@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          1 day ago

          Having scrolled through a couple years of her comics just to see for myself I think she’s mostly just anti-MAGA and occasionally overshoots a little into common men’s issues she has a blind spot for.

          I don’t think she’s misandrist she’s just not perfect.

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          47
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          I have you tagged “the reason women choose the bear” over your behavior the last time that came up - you have a long long history of being an incel and claiming any criticism of a man is criticism of all men, which you’re doing yet again in this thread.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              For the most part I like lemmy, but the community is incredibly incel-heavy. One of the most successful forms of bait on here (besides political trolling) is posting any even slightly contentious topic about women’s experiences in society or things like institutional sexism. Seriously, keep an eye out - it’s depressingly predictable.

          • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            1 day ago

            What a random mischaracterization, feels like I’ve been mistaken for somebody. Theres really nothing to even respond to, here, except point out ad hominem.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Criticism of a person’s behavior when that’s the subject at hand is not an ad homeniem, it’s the argument. You’ve got a long history of misapplying logical fallacies and taking these sorts of commentaries where a man is portrayed negatively incredibly personally and then poorly defending your claims.

              For example: elsewhere in this thread, where you’ve refused to back up your claims that the author is a “well documented” misandrist. If it’s well documented, it should not be a burden for you to provide evidence, and yet you refuse repeatedly.

              • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                1 day ago

                Criticism of the criticism of a person’s behavior, via attacking the person and not the argument, is Ad Hominem, and also Whataboutism.

                • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Saying it does not make it so. It seems to me that referencing your prior behavior and attacking your lack of sources are both relevant and productive for discussion, while misusing fallacies to shut down arguments you don’t like is, ironically, a rhetorical fallacy. They aren’t deflecting by randomly bringing up some unrelated characteristic (for example: you shouldn’t trust this influencer’s opinion on food, I have it on good authority that they’re a terrible parent!), they’re calling back to your previous behavior in similar situations (for example: you shouldn’t trust this influencer’s opinion on food because they have a history of giving people food poisoning!). That isn’t ad hominem, or whataboutism.

                  If your character and actions might be damming to your arguments, attacking them is attacking your argument, especially when also attacking your sources! Ironically, continuing to attack the comic artist without citing sources is ad hominem, by definition.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  17
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I’m directly criticizing two separate things: your behavior, and your claim that pizzacake is a well documented misandrist. That your behavior is remarkably predictable around these issues doesn’t invalidate your claim; we get the conclusion that your claim is baseless from the way you refuse to support it.

                  Neither of those are an ad hominem or a whattaboutism, and you would be well served by finding out what those terms represent before you try and defend yourself with them.

        • ikt@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          i only found recipe results for pizza cake and i have no interest in reaching out to her on whatever other social media platform im not on

            • M137@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Holy shit, you made me have an absolute laughing fit with that comment. How the fuck are you so fucking dumb that you think that image proves your point? All it actually does is show your extremely secluded incel mindset. It was fun to read this whole thing but this specific reply from you made it a truly memorable thing. You have some serious issues, I hope you have no contact with any women that could be affected but you, “IRL” or not.

            • ikt@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              so all the reddit threads had nothing of value then i started reading the kiwifarms forum post then i realised i don’t give a shit

            • PlantJam@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Are you taking her anti trump comics to be anti men? Your search screenshot in a different thread was just for controversy, not misandry as you initially claimed. I’ve seen several pro lgbt comics from her, so saying she’s anti equality seems disingenuous.

              • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                1 day ago

                No, I’m taking her anti-men comics to be anti-men. The multiple posts she made on men’s health month and the many posts and comments about male sexual assault victims. It’s really easy to search this up, you don’t have to sit here and ask me about it.

    • gnu@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s particularly ironic as OP was the one making a song and dance about wanting all comics from bigoted artists banned the other day.

      • Grail@multiverse.soulism.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        With Jago it was really simple. Someone put the bigoted comics in the comments and it was really easy to see they were bigoted.

        With PizzaCake it’s a whole thing! The people who don’t like her refuse to give any evidence. It’s almost like the evidence doesn’t exist.

        • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I remember one comic of hers was pretty tone deaf and caused a bit of a stir:

          Not sure how to find it, but it was supposed to be a “imagine if women acted like this to men” as a way to point out problematic behaviors men have, but instead of picking things that never happen to men for the point to land she used things that actually already happen to men. This showed she was apparently unaware the reversal was true instead of ridiculous which, yikes.

          That’s the only thing I’m aware of though so not sure about “well documented”. Maybe there’s some social media posts that people didn’t like or something? That’s as much light as I can shed on the situation.

          • Cypher@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            I think this is the one.

            https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1dpptkk/talk/

            I get what she’s aiming at but it’s a complete miss in my opinion. Men absolutely get mocked for all of those issues.

            The getting robbed reaction is also true of men who’ve been raped or sexually assaulted.

            I’m not convinced she’s a full on misandrist but she’s had some bad takes. Hard not to have some misses when you’ve made that much content.

            • jimmux@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 hours ago

              At the rate she churns them out, yeah it’s not too surprising.

              If she doubled down on bad takes it would really be a problem, but I’m not aware of that happening.