For a while now the transition away from Manifest V2 (MV2) to MV3 has been on-going and it looks like it is entering its final phase of deprecation, at least, in the case of Google Chrome. A recent discussion thread in the w3c WebExtensions Community Group GitHub repo has highlighted how the latest and upcoming versions of the most popular browser are expected to be its final releases with support for MV2 extensions.

What this essentially means is that the tricks and bypasses that were used to keep MV2 extensions like uBlock Origin and others alive will not work any more on Chrome, or at least not for very long. For example the Windows Registry mod that could extend MV2 availability will cease to function after Chromium version 151.

            • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              50
              ·
              14 days ago

              Those sites will be dead to me :)

              QR codes are like the popups of days gone by. With incredibly few exceptions, I refuse to scan them. They are so easy to redirect for nefarious purposes, and you can’t easily inspect the url to know, assuming thats something you even do. Also my phone case covers the camera and it’s a bitch to get open so I’m very choosy with what gets camera time.

              • Ghoelian@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                19
                ·
                13 days ago

                On my phone I use URLCheck (available in f-droid). You set it as your default browser app, but instead of opening a browser, it opens a popup where you can see the URL, and use some useful tools like removing tracking parameters or automatically rewriting x.com to xcancel.com. The rewritten URL can then just be forwarded to your actual browser (or whatever app is set up to handle that particular URL).

                I still won’t actually open random qr code URLs though, especially not ones from google.

                • Taldan@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  How do the rewrites work? Is it like Redirector?

                  Would be awesome if I could just import my Redirector regex json file

              • LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                14 days ago

                …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                Unfortunately, we’re fighting an uphill battle here.

                We’d need government regulation “protecting privacy”, instead they seem all too eager to concede that in a futile effort to " protect the children ".

                • nyan@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  At which point they cease to be your favourites, I hope. There are so many alternatives in that space that only inertia keeps people using the Empire of Evil.

                • Axolotl@feddit.it
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I doubt SearXNG is going to integrate it lmao, and if they do, someone will fork or i will keep using older versions

                • Phantaloons@piefed.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  …just wait until all your favorite search engines integrate it.

                  Searching is already dead. Every search results in 200 Ai articles full of bullshit, even Qwant or DuckDuckGo.

                  The corpo-web died already, y’all are just crying over the scraps.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      The MV3 support in firefox is even stricter than in Chrome. I found that chrome will let you sidestep CSP to make an HTTP request. Firefox won’t.

      • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t understand what you found, but firefox still supports the web request blocking API for Mv3 extensions, which is what ublock needs.

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          I was debugging one of my favourite extensions this week to figure out why it didn’t work on firefox. It hadn’t been updated in years, so something changed in firefox in the last few months.

          I assume the Chrome version still works. I’m not installing it.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            if it hadn’t been updated in years then it will be an Mv2 extension, irrelevant to discussion of Mv3 strictness.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      13 days ago

      FF support is getting worse and worse though.

      Barely any of the sites I use for work support FF.

      Laugh all you want but shit is a bit fucked.

      Ladybird is our last best hope and its barely a glimmer.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        13 days ago

        Fun fact: many sites that say that they don’t support firefox lie, their sites usually support it but they never tested it or they deem firefox “less secure” or some bullshit, but with an useragent spoofer, they will work

        (Not all sites ofc)

            • fizzle@quokk.au
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              13 days ago

              I’m not talking about sites that claim not to support FF. I’m talking about sites that have broken features when visited in FF.

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                13 days ago

                Do you have any example? Can you send any link? I never experienced those problems myself so i want to try

                • [deleted]@piefed.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Chrome is doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by not following web standards. There are several websites I have used where the payment process or uploading process only worked in chrome.

                  Again, this is a problem with chrome doing things that breaks consistency between browsers that are supposed to be following the same web standards.

                • fizzle@quokk.au
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  This is very well documented, and a very common experience.

                  They were talking about exactly this on late night linux podcast just last week.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 days ago

        That isn’t FF support. That is chrome doing the same thing as Internet Explorer did by implementing non-standard functionality to abuse their market dominance.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Sure but if devs don’t test sites in Firefox then very they don’t support Firefox.

    • henfredemars@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      180
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yep, sorry but not sorry. Advertisements aren’t safe. The industry has been ruined by bad actors and it’s a shame, but also not my problem.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        124
        ·
        14 days ago

        I worked in ads only a few months and learned how fucked that industry was. They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser, sucking as much info as they can. The fact that it hasn’t been regulated to hell is shocking, and truly a failure of all leaders.

        • OwOarchist@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          68
          ·
          14 days ago

          They’re basically given license to just run scripts in your browser

          That’s the crazy thing.

          You want to show me an image, maybe an animated gif, and link it to your website where you’re selling shit? Fine. Annoying, but fine.

          But I don’t care how many crocodile tears they shed about ‘but websites depend on ad income’ – I am not letting random, unvetted advertisers run arbitrary code on my computer. I don’t care if it’s in a sandbox inside a sandbox. Exploits may be found, sandboxes may be escaped. And there’s plenty of trouble they can get into even within their little sandbox, like running a fucking crypto miner or something.

          So, yeah. Adblock and noscript everywhere and always.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            14 days ago

            Yes, they can host a GIF on their server & show it to me with a non-personalized link, & promote it where they believe the average reader might be interested in it. Or some reader(s).

            Just show me the ads you’re showing everybody else, and make money from sales of useful things & services.

            • OwOarchist@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              17
              ·
              14 days ago

              It’s not even that hard to have targeted ads while still respecting privacy – just base the targeting on the other content on the page, rather than on the user.

        • Airfried@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          14 days ago

          Internet Browsers store way too much data and have waaaay too many permissions. It’s sickening.

          • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            not enough, what they want is personal data to mine. they cant do that in simple terms. meta, glassdoor, indeed , linkden,(plaid) tries to use convoluted mehtods to get you to give up more personal data than you normally would in order to access the rest of the site.(glassdoor and indeed has an additional reason to want you ridentiy)

        • HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          It’s because people don’t go into these offices with fire and guns. If a bunch of advertising people were slaughtered every few weeks things may get better.

          Same goes for collections, eventually no one will want to do the job.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        14 days ago

        The whole industry is bad actors. The quaint, pastoral idea of actually advertising things you genuinely might want to know about is utterly beyond dead, it died the moment they realized they could use the same pipeline to harvest data and manipulate and control people. Using it for mere advertising is a waste of everyone’s time and resources when they have an option so much more lucrative on the table.

    • Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      14 days ago

      Over 10 years ago someone at my office had their work PC and user drive encrypted with ransomware because of a bad ad injection from one of those job search sites. Thankfully it was limited to nothing critical and incremental backups restore the drive…but hopefully they found a good lead because they were canned.

      If they’d had a good ad blocker this would have been a non issue

      • DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        14 days ago

        I work in IT: Pretty much all the malware we deal with comes from ads. I’ve pitched making ad blocking standard but they never go for it, even though it’s clear it would prevent an absolute shit ton of attacks. It’s crazy!

    • tatterdemalion@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      14 days ago

      Seriously. If Google really wants to shove ads down our throats, they could at least regulate them so they’re not constantly horny scams. But that would cost them money, oh the humanity.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    163
    ·
    14 days ago

    Oh look all the “chrome but in a different outfit” browsers are doing the same terrible shit? What a shocker, no one could have predicted that the many many things all on the same base where actuality just fake competition.

        • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          37
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Communicating with external devices via USB or the old D-Sub connectors.

          Printers, microcontrollers, instruments, etc… Directly instead of through the OS.

          Notably, ESPHome Programmer uses it for flashing ESP32s wired. Other companies like Solo Motor Controllers use it for delivering a user GUI to customers that is always updated but that can switch between versions instantly for production without having to having to deal with window’s broken method of having to manually search and download .exes for every program.

        • baner@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          13 days ago

          Even grapheneOS use it for adb into your phone to flash the images.

      • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Really? Holy shit I can switch to zen fully at work and at home and uninstall chromium. Webserial was literally the only thing I needed

        • tomjuggler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          I heard about the web usb thing, it’s also going to be a game changer for me (I haven’t tried yet, hopefully it works)

        • Muffi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          Why the downvotes? I have 4 machines at work, and none of them can send code to a LEGO Spike Hub over bluetooth in Firefox but works perfectly fine in Chrome.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      13 days ago

      They are all chrome with google scratched out and their name written in sharpie in its place.

      Of course they are all doing it, cause they are all the same thing.

        • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          13 days ago

          because theres no fighting google.

          Microsoft tried, and google won, which is why Edge became a chrome reskin instead of what it was before.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            The winning move is not to do business with them, don’t compete just exist and pretend they don’t exist. Microslop played the game and lost, but it is a stupid silly game.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              13 days ago

              kinda hard to do when google holds the internet by the balls. and can twist at any moment to get what they want.

              Microsoft and Mozilla employees have both accused them of doing this in the past, to sabotage non-chrome browsers on google services, to make chrome look better and drive users to chrome.

              • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                News to me, Does google hold this site by the balls? They have a lot of power yes, but they are not some unsinkable boat.

              • Babalugats@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                They only ‘hold the internet by the balls’ if you are using and reliant on Google products.

                There are hundreds (if not more) tutorials and lists online to guide you through degoogling

                • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I’m sure we can get thousands of websites and every major corporation to degoogle cause you said they should.

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      God it still pisses me off what they did to my boy Opera. All of us left when they diverted after v12. We all saw this coming.

      Then Vivaldi came which I have tried in quite a while but it sucked. Firefox it is.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        13 days ago

        I like Vivaldi except for two things: it uses the same engine as Chrome so facilitates Google’s stranglehold on web standards, and it is closed-source. For functionality and design it’s one of the best, but those are important downsides.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Chrome is death to a browser, there is little reason to exist if google gets to make the big calls.

    • andz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      It’s a damn shame, I’ve always liked Vivaldi otherwise. I’ve been dual running Vivaldi and Firefox for years now, Vivaldi for casual browsing and Firefox for more serious stuff + YouTube.

      Oh well, it’s time to do a full switch, I guess.

      Kinda funny, I’ve been doing the exact same thing with Win/Linux for approximately the same length of time. Needed Win because of dome software that just doesn’t work linux, and sadly, I still do.

      Google and Microsoft can go fuck each other with a frozen cactus for all I care.

      • kamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 days ago

        The folks at Vivaldi have been doing some work on their internal ad blocker, I think with the intention to bring most of the functionality of uBo internally so that it doesn’t have to be an extension. Not sure how far along they are, but maybe they’re intentionally keeping it quiet.

        • reka@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 days ago

          Vivaldi have earned and deserve a lot of trust here I believe. All my chromium eggs sit in their basket.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Same here. I’m an Opera refugee so to say (and I had high hopes for Opera actually). I’ve been using Vivaldi since its first public alpha/preview/whatever they were calling it.

        • andz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Aye, I’m just not sure how it’s going to play out. One can hope, though. It’s definitely one of the best options Chrome-wise either way.

          • kamen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            13 days ago

            I’m wondering what the decision making was when they were starting (which is now 10 years ago already, time flies, yo).

            From today’s perspective, a Firefox fork sounds way more logical. Back then maybe things with Blink/Chromium weren’t looking so grim, maybe they were relying on the experience of that part of the team that moved over from Opera…

            • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              10 years ago Google was trusted and liked. The cracks were starting to show, but we’re talking about the Google that was still open sourcing a lot of their products and loudly opposing government censorship of the internet.

    • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      I mean, on a technical level chromium isn’t a terrible browser engine. Building your own engine from scratch is Extremely Hard™ and it’s entirely possible to build a decent browser on top of it, so I can understand why most alternative projects have done just that.

      It’s just… google’s control over chromium is concerning.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        And an ecosystem of one engine is not healthy. Even if google was not google, this is a massive risk to take for the Easy™ way.

        • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          12 days ago

          It’s not an ecosystem of one, though one is very dominant.

          You can compare it to Linux. It’s not the only Unix-like kernel, but it’s similarly dominant. If you want to create a new distribution, it doesn’t make any sense to spend a decade trying to write your own kernel rather than just using the Linux kernel (insert GNU Hurd jokes here).

          Is that an unhealthy ecosystem then? I don’t think it is.

          What makes the chromium situation unhealthy is Google’s ownership and control, not that it’s the preferred engine for other browsers. I mean, even a company as large as Microsoft gave up trying to create their own engine.

          • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Your example is a poor choice, Linux overall is one example of an OS for users. There are more OS choices then Linux, that is good. Nothing like web browsers where people where actively trying to make everything chromium based. The ecosystem is unhealthy when there is one choice for an entire type of software (so for OS you have Linux, Windows, and Mac as big players) and outside of Firefox and its forks all web browsers are Chromium based. Oh and although there are other fringe options they don’t matter much, much like in the OS world Temple OS is not a real choice.

            My point was that it would be very very bad if Firefox was not there (or turned into chromium) as an ecosystem of one is a massive risk regardless of who controls it.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      67
      ·
      14 days ago

      They could have sat on 30 second ads every 15 minutes till the cows came home and most of us would have been fine with it.

      They could have sat on premium family for $9 a month for years and we’d have been ok with it.

      They had to be greedy as fuck until none of us want to use their services.

      • Airfried@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        14 days ago

        The line has to go up. That is literally the law. The fact that Youtube has a larger income than Disney doesn’t mean it will stop. They can never stop. They just can crash and burn down eventually but only after making a few people very very rich.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          That’s the damn thing, the line could have gone up through getting more people. They decided less people and higher prices would win… it will not

          • CybranM@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 days ago

            Doesn’t chrome have like a 90% market share? I doubt they can get many more people, therefore need to get more out of the ones they have

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              speaking more to youtube, a bunch of the other alphabet properties.

    • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      Not after they demonstrate the power of their evil browser. In a way, you have determined the choice of the ads that you will be shown first.

    • Mexigore@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Honestly I don’t think so, the average person won’t bother with changing browser. So they might lose more users but they dont care about those users because they are were using adblock anyways

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    The browser wars have been kind of strange from the perspective of someone who’s been using Firefox for well over a decade. It’s a bit like hearing about the Civil War while living in Oregon.

    • shneancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      i used opera for around 13 years. i knew about the flaws but i was simply used to it, and as long as adblock worked i couldn’t be bothered to switch to anything else

      then my laptop broke and only that happening gave me the incentive to install something else, i was starting from (close to) scratch anyway

      it’ll take a lot of effort for people to abandon what they know, even if they’ll be moving towards something better

      i use Zen now :) it’s nice

  • DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    14 days ago

    Remember that article awhile back about the FBI recommending you use an adblocker?

    That means even the FBI recommends you don’t use Google and Microsoft browsers anymore

  • wuffah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Government becomes more fascist, tech companies become more fascist.

    People don’t like surveillance advertising, and most reject it when given the choice. Unpopular policies are squashed when the people are represented, and the Republican policies and interests of forced and extreme deregulation are being represented here, not the people’s.

    That, and I believe advertising is inherently fascistic in the way that it distorts realty, and intrusively attempts to modify thinking with punitive, insulting, and psychologically coercive methods - it is corporate propaganda, and when it is combined with surveillance and purchased by the State, it becomes fascism.

    I can’t wait for them to try and make ad-blocking illegal. We’re seeing a similar trend with the age verification firm Yoti “reporting” GrapheneOS users to “the authorities”, whatever the hell that Gestapo bullshit scare-tactic means. If FOSS software and ad-blocking are tools of privacy and freedom from thought manipulation, and those concepts are being attacked by a State-backed corporate entity, then the State no longer represents those values. Chrome, like so much other corporate software that has sunk to surveillance advertising with a healthy side of selling data to the government, is now just another fascist tool to punish democratic resistance.

    Freedom from advertising is a human right.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      14 days ago

      The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …

      ~Edward Bernays From his 1928 publication - Propaganda

      Edward is the father of modern advertising through psychological manipulation.

      He’s the reason bacon and eggs are breakfast.

  • DigDoug@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Firefox and its derivatives (and Safari - sorry Apple users) are the only browsers not using Google’s Blink web engine these days - at least until Ladybird is released.

    Despite the Mozilla Foundation’s many stupid decisions, Firefox (and Safari) is starting to look like the only thing stopping Google from completely controlling the internet.

  • const_void@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    Cue the Brave shills “recommending” to switch to Brave in 5…4…3…

      • Whitebrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        82
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        Brave is by a company who’s in the business of serving ads.

        Much like google was back in the day, they’re trying to obtain market share with a product that they can easily manipulate after the fact and rely on people not jumping ship as things get progressively worse and worse bit by bit

        Think of the “approved ads” era followed by the “enhanced security features” which made it so your block list couldn’t be updated at a moments notice and now it’s being stripped entirely.

        Better to avoid it entirely and just use Firefox or a derivative thereof

          • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            25
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            “Firefox doesn’t have this one feature I like so I will keep using browser made by an ad company. I’m sure there will be no consequences long term”.

            Google Chrome is killing all uBlock Origin

            “Oh shit. No one could have predicted this!”.

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                While Firefox itself can still be installed and used on rooted or non-certified Android devices, some AI-powered features may not be available on those platforms.

                Yeah, that’s not a real issue for me. Is it for you?

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Firefox dragged its feet on an extremely useful feature for years.

              Are you seriously trying to act like Firefox hasn’t been continually shooting themselves in the foot the past decade?

              • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                I’ve been using Firefox for decades without issues. Yes, Chrome was a better browser for a long time but Firefox wasn’t that far behind and was absolutely fine browser to use.

                Do you really think Mozilla could win browser race with Google, the fucking second biggest company in the world? Of course Chrome had more features, it had basically unlimited resources at it disposal. But yeah, let’s blame Mozilla for not winning with them decisively.

                YOU are shooting yourself in the foot. You abandoned Firefox for couple of features and soon you will be browsing the web with ads. Come back and tell me how extremely useful Chrome’s features are when can you no longer skip Youtube ads.

            • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              14 days ago

              I swear I hate tabbed browsing, because it leads to people hording tabs like a freaking squirrel hordes nuts.

              If you need it for later, book mark it.

              If you’re done with it close it.

              • karashta@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                13 days ago

                This doesn’t work when I have memory issues. That tab is open as part of my external system of memory for myself so I know what I was trying to do before one of my several issues prevented me finishing.

              • ericwdhs@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                Bookmarks in mobile Firefox is another issue. Bookmark management is a massive chore. I end up keeping tabs around a lot longer in mobile just to avoid messing with it.

                On desktop Firefox with the Bookmark Tab Here extension (native functionality I missed from Chrome), bookmarking and organizing a new page is just two clicks. I use that workflow extensively. Apparently I have over 7000 bookmarks all organized that way.

              • FlexibleToast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                I’ve started using Karakeep for this. If I haven’t used a tab in a while but want it to stick around, throw it to Karakeep, let ai tag it, then close that tab.

            • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              13 days ago

              It’s still not pushed out to phones. I’m going to keep shit talking them until it’s actually out, because they’ve spent far too much time stringing them along

    • Identikit@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 days ago

      So many people asked “Why not Opera?” When I jumped off the AI browsers.

      This. This is why. Didn’t trust em.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        13 days ago

        I don’t think it’s a matter of Opera being untrustworthy as much as it is the fact that they’re a Chromium-based browser, same as Edge.

      • zawius@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 days ago

        No, and do not intend to. But I remember they recommended Ironfox, which is very similar and good, imo.

        • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Is Ironfox capable of interfacing with Librewolf? As in sharing bookmarks and credentials? Because to tell you the truth that is the one thing that is holding me to Firefox.

    • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Whether you use Firefox or Librewolf you are entirely dependent on the hundreds of full timer developers Mozilla’s got working on the Gecko codebase.

    • heirday@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      librewolf broke too many websites for me to reasonably keep using it :(

      also just keep in mind: it’s lack of a fingerprint now becomes the fingerprint.

      • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        The default settings do break quite a few sites, but after 10 mins of tweaking it works like Firefox but without all the AI bullshit and adverts

  • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 days ago

    When will marketing people figure out our generation views ads as hostile, non-consensual, and unwanted? They are a negative way to introduce us to your product/service. I actively avoid things with obnoxious ads. Native, old spice, liberty mutual, all of those brands the first thing that comes to mind is the negative experience of an invasive advertisement I never fucking asked for.

    • HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Except we are not customers, and it’s the customers that are important. I’s like cows asking between themselves when will the butcher realize that they do not like being killed for meat.

      Butcher knows, but butcher doesn’t sell comfort to cows, he sells meat to customers.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 days ago

      When will marketing people figure out our generation views ads as hostile, non-consensual, and unwanted?

      Who knows. I was at the beach this past weekend and there were two different planes flying ad banners in front of me.

      What the fuck. That’s two different local businesses that I have noted I will actively avoid.

      Can’t even unplug and face a clear sky without getting ads shoved in your fucking face.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      Ads aren’t always there to get you to buy something specific. In fact, an ad you don’t interact with is a better ad because they don’t have to pay for click-through.

      You don’t want to buy brand A because they have ads, so you buy brand B instead, but both widgets are owned by the same holding company. Or they’re made in the same factory. Or they use the same components. Or they have the same shareholders. Any way you slice it, the same rich assholes are getting your money.

      The goal of the Ads is to put a bug in your head and get you to buy something.

      And that’s just the Ads. The tracking is also (increasingly primarily) about political manipulation and surveillance.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Apparently not, as ads keep selling.

      I hate to sound so cynical, but many folks are gullible. They’ll trust a flashy ad because it looks nice to them, and gives them a positive emotional response, and then internalize that judgement as their own decision (so when someone comes to challenge it, they take it personally).

      It’s not just old people living in another time, either. I’ve watched teenagers and young adults trust obviously-sponsored influencers like they’re friends. Or wear brands as status symbols.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 days ago

      Because it works and makes them money, and people end up buying the products.

      What they really need is an option to leave ads or remove them. The ones that want ads gone aren’t buying your product, and the ones that like ads like to see new products. Just give us options. The options are usually to pay for the service and get no ads, or get the service for free and you get ads.

      Where people get mad is when you have to pay for an ad supported plan.

      All this doesn’t really work in the real world anyways, because YouTube offers both an ad free plan, and a free supported plan, and yet everyone still complains about having to pay for ad free. So the war continues.

      Btw i pay for YouTube premium, and every ad free streaming service because i support the ad free plans and hope they continue to exist.

  • nukeforyou@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    13 days ago

    Great… I work in IT so this means MORE “virus” calls because you 100000000% need an adblocker on the web to stop those fake “your computer is being hacked” malicious advertisements from websites.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      13 days ago

      Time to polish those presentation skills and deliver a memo to your company, extolling the virtues of Firefox as a company-wide browser instead of the now malware inducing Chrome, Opera, and Edge.

      • dwokimmortalus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Wont happen. Security teams will block it still. Firefox blocks deep packet inspection which corporate security suites use for monitoring. Its the reason chrome is the default now in almost all companies.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      How about SRWare Iron?

      It’s corporate backed, so security may view it favorably over FOSS forks like Helium or Ungoogled Chromium.

      There’s a whole slew of Chromium forks that I think are trying to preserve V2 functionality.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      the average person on lemmy probably cares more about privacy than the average internet dweller.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        14 days ago

        The average internet dweller doesn’t even know they’ve lost privacy.

        after all, their post has a delete button next to it and their messages say private! They wouldn’t just lie

        • Prove_your_argument@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          14 days ago

          100%

          Even many, many lemmy users believe there is a semblance of privacy on the internet today, or in national businesses with modern IP camera tech. It’s all gone.

          They have enough telemetry to know who you are between all the details the browser gives them. Hell, most people don’t even know what a tracking pixel is or how it has been used for well over a decade.

          We’re at the point with machine learning that the resources required to process all of these datapoints is trivial even when done onboard fairly cheap devices.

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 days ago

            I worked on ad stuff for a very short time where they could tell if they showed you an ad a year ago, and another one, and then if you went to a store, that it was all connected. They would know if you went into a store with presence detection that their ad was working.

        • TheRedSpade@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          Where do their messages still say private? I’ve not seen that in years. The initialism “PM” seemed to get replaced by “DM” overnight. Also though, many of them didn’t lose privacy. Anyone, at the very least in USA, younger than the Patriot Act never had privacy to begin with.

    • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      14 days ago

      Here? We’re a rounding error not worth considering.

      The majority of users do not use any web browser. They “click on the internet”.

      • k0e3@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        And even if we’re conscious of it, I doubt even many of us do enough to really protect ourselves. I certainly don’t.

      • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        Any PC I assist with has FF/UBO when I walk away. Now I have to strip out the AI shit too. So maybe I walk away with Waterfox on there now. Librewolf is too much for the average folk.

        • SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Tip: if you install Firefox from scratch frequently, you should build a custom user.js where you disable all the stuff you don’t like, and then just drop the file in the profile directory with a script, instead of manually going through all the settings pages each time.

          • PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 days ago

            Simply put, you can wratchet down the security settings on FF manually, or use a fork that has done that for you. Waterfox is preset with pretty decent settings and Librewolf dials it to max protect. It’s a bit of work to relax it and that’d frustrate an average user. Waterfox is a fair compromise.

      • andz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        That’s not completely true. I’ve had a fling with Vivaldi for a long time, but only for casual browsing on bookmarked sites I visit regularly (think forums, etc), but for anything serious, it’s obviously Firefox only.

        I always liked Vivaldi a lot, but I guess it’s about breakup time. It’s a damn fucking shame.

        You’d be hard pressed to find someone who thinks I’m not a “techy” person either, considering I’ve been building machines since the early pentium era.

        For posterity, I can mention that Opera and then Vivaldi were the first two “not IE” browsers I ever switched to for myself. Got in some trouble as my parents thought that “I had deleted the Internet” (their exact words…).

        Those were the days, heh.

        • Taasz/Woof@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 days ago

          Yeah and to be fair my main browser is Zen but I still have chrome and edge because I work on websites and need to make sure things work OK, they’re just not used for much else.

    • Airfried@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      I have degoogled Chromium installed because some things only work in a chrome browser. However it’s a special use case and I would barely notice if ublock was gone. I wouldn’t use it as a main browser anyway.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Me.

      I use ungoogled chromium and librewolf, all day every day.

      Loada of sites just dont work in FF.

      • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Loada of sites just dont work in FF.

        Which ones? I want to see for myself what I’m missing out on.

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago
          • my uni’s LMS
          • my bank
          • the popular accounting software I use at work
          • the other accounting software I use at work
          • the time tracking software we use
          • google maps
          • accommodation booking site

          that’s just the stuff I can remember for the moment.