• Billegh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    What’s funny is that $1,000,000,000,000 is enough to give 18,000,000 families of four $35,000 (slightly above the us poverty live for a family of four), and still have over $350,000,000,000 left.

    Edit: maybe funny isn’t the right word…

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Amazing how in the two years since Trump took office for his second term, his wealth has grown 5x.

    Five. Fucking. Times.

    He was worth scantly less than 200B back in 2024.

    In 2025, he went up to 342B. What is that like 75%?

    And how 3x since last year.

    Man everyone thought he was crazy for buying twitter. Him, Zuck, Bezos, and Ellison need to be first in line for the guillotines.

  • Burninator05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    How can we call him a trillionaire if the wealth is effectively imaginary. If it isnt imaginary l, tax it.

  • itsBlorpinTime@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    18 hours ago

    The world seems to be owned by Musk, and he really REALLY doesn’t like poor people. This is the same klepto grifter who suggested a political party for only the middle class.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Financial obesity is an existential threat to any society that tolerates it, and needs to cease being celebrated, rewarded, and positioned as an aspirational goal.

    Corporations are the only ‘persons’ which should be subjected to capital punishment, but trillionaires should be forced to transition into billionaires, and billionaires should be euthanised through taxation.

  • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    2 days ago

    What was the figure? All it would take to end world hunger is 500 billion or something like that? Half one person’s weath?

    What sort of person has that amount and decides not to end world hunger.

      • errer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        44
        ·
        2 days ago

        The same kind of person who ends government programs that help those hungry people, killing hundreds of thousands of them

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Hunger is a political problem, not a money problem. You can’t just say “here are X billion dollars, let’s end world hunger”. Having said that, the system that allows people like Musk to get that rich, is also the same system that creates hunger.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Here in the good ole USA money and politics are the same thing. If you have the political will, you can get the money and if you have the money, you can but the political will.

        That said, didn’t Elmo have a beef with the fucking United Nations because he said he’d pay the 6 or 7 billion to end world hunger if the could prove that it’s possible and then they produced a detailed plan and he quibbled and but-akshually’ed his way to a reneg because he never intended to do jack shit for anyone other than himself?

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      What it would really take to end world hunger is massive systemic change that’s actually pretty straight-forward but is fought by every single person who loves a deaperate workforce and their insane conservative followers who believe that their greatest enemy is a hungry person.

    • krisevol@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      He didn’t have that much money. He has stocks, and stocks from companies that don’t turn a profit won’t solve world hunger.

        • krisevol@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          17 hours ago

          California spends 1.5 billion already and hasn’t accomplished anything. You think 10 billion would fix homeless across the country?

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            15 hours ago

            We were talking about world hunger, but k. You’re obviously trying to pick a fight here on what was obviously not a concrete plan. I’m not sure if you noticed but I’m actually not an expert and don’t haven’t a 32 part plan on how to solve it. Instead pointing out the obvious fact that the man is worth more than the gdp of many nations and how none of that will go to help others, but please keep telling me how the idea of him helping is silly.

            • krisevol@lemmus.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I get it I’m not expert as well. I’m just saying his stocks are over inflated in a bubble economy, and if you tried to extract any cash from this, the bubble pops and nothing if value can really be extracted.

              Here is my thinking. Most of his stocks are trading at 350p/e. Most normal companies trade at 10. Give it a high end of 35, his real “wealth” is 100 billion, not 1 trillion. Or if the 100 billion he would owe 20 billion in taxes, and we know he still owes 40 billion on X. On the high end we can safely say he could extract 40 billion in cash “if” he didn’t owe money on other projects or loans. Realistically he would get a free billion.

              The reason i say the high drop in p/e is because every speculative investor is investing in him, and not his stocks. And if he put in the required paperwork to sell all of his stocks, he would trigger a mass sell off from investors and the p/e would go to realistic values. The other reason is there isn’t enough liquidity in the market to support 1 trillion in sell off to support a zero crash anyways.

  • fdnomad@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t consider him a trillionaire. The stock he holds is of an unprofitable company. If he tried to hold a trillion dollars in his hands by cashing out on the stock, it would plummet, who would buy that at that price without the hype? If he cant hold a trillion dollars in his hands, how can he be a trillionaire? Its purely speculative.

    It’s like some ancient king claiming to be a trillionaire because a lot of people believe that there’s a ton of gold in his kingdom - without good evidence. There’s no guarantee he’d be able to mine enough gold to become a trillionaire, so why call him that?

      • krisevol@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It’s not, not even close. He’s worth a trillion because investors are investing in him. If he tried to sell everything the 350p/e stocks would go to 20 instantly making him only with 10 billion. He still owes 40 billion on Twitter.

        He would be bankrupt overnight if he tried to sell it all

  • brachiosaurus@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    If you use twitter you are directly to blame. Stop upvoting twitter repost, upvote serious posts that calls out elon musk not memes.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    While I agree it is a moral failure it also seems like a direct attack on the populace. Did they go to war with the populace and not tell them? Let them make a formal declaration of war against their own citizens then see where all the shit falls. “/s” but not “/s”.

  • SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    21 hours ago

    The billions these monsters are taking in comes from somewhere. The oligarchs are using the middle class for their personal piggy bank, while America self-medicates with cheap beer and reality shows.

  • archchan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    The difference between a billion dollars and a trillion dollars is roughly a trillion dollars…

    • nieminen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I remember when the National debt in the US was 7 trillion, and people were talking about it at the time about how enormous that number was, and how people couldn’t conceptualize it. Now we have a singular person in our midst who could singlehandedly clear up 14% of that. And our current national debt is like 40 trillion now?